434
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 168 points 10 months ago

*Football team that’s been a dominant presence in the league for the last several seasons wins AFC Championship again and will be returning to the Super Bowl*

Conservatives: TAYLOR SWIFT DID THIS TO GET JOE BIDEN REELECTED!!!1!!

[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 92 points 10 months ago

Plus Taylor Swift who has been immensely popular for like...What, over a decade now? Only now suddenly wielding her influence to run the government or something? Please, she's rich, popular, and in business, she basically operates as her own independent nation without needing to run anyone else's. 😂

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago

She turns 35 just before the next president takes office, meaning this is the first election she could legally become president. Coincidence???

Absolutely a coincidence. This is all a marketing stunt, but the conspiracies have been fun to read.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

She's also been doing get out the vote/voter registration campaigns since at least 2018. She has officially endorsed multiple Democrats in the past, including Biden in the general election in 2020. None of this is new or a secret. Conservatives think they have uncovered some grand plot though. Like Taylor Swift needs the NFL and she wouldn't have any publicity or influence without it. If anything it's probably the opposite, with NFL trying to use Taylor Swift to boost their own popularity more.

[-] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

I heard NPR say that she's brought in roughly $300 million to the NFL because so many more women are now watching

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Syndic@feddit.de 9 points 10 months ago

Well she did dare to encourage her fans to vote! And that's obviously anti-democratic or something.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago

She's obviously a witch /s

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 23 points 10 months ago

She turned me into a newt.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago
[-] Municipal0379@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Jokes on you, it’s Newt Gingrich

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

... it [sic] got worse.

[-] dulcemaria@lemdro.id 11 points 10 months ago

they’re burning all the witches even if you aren’t one

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 122 points 10 months ago

These people are unhinged.

[-] don@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

🌍👨‍🚀🔫🧑🏻‍🚀always have been.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 118 points 10 months ago

It bothers me so much to know how stupid I am and also know there are so many people even stupider than me.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Think for a moment how stupid the average person is...Then realise that half the population is dumber than that. - George Carlin

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

The problem is that most people overestimate the average person too.

So it's more like "imagine the average person, and realize around 70% of the population is dumber than that."

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

*median, but we'll let it slide, George

It kind of plays into the joke anyway

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Yeah. I'm dumb. I'm also in the top percentile of intelligence. No bueno.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I mean you can't be that dumb. You speak French.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 80 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Everything I don't like is woke, or a psyop, or SJW, or liberal, or socialist, or..."

[-] Cannibal_MoshpitV3@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Or we could go Victorian and use Anarchist

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mokus 66 points 10 months ago

WTF? She probably has more fans than the NFL and these morons think she’s getting signal boosted?

Obviously this is a psyop to boost awareness that the Chiefs exist.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 33 points 10 months ago

Are...are they trying to start something with the Swifties? Because I'm pretty sure Y'all-Quaeda is no match for them, and I'm here for it!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

if there's any side likely to win a civil war in the US its the swifties. If she told her fans to get guns they would.

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

If she told all her fans to get open carry permits and assault rifles the GOP would all rally behind smart gun control laws and try to raise the minimum age to thwart her.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 64 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh no. Please don't target Taylor Swift. Oh gosh. Conservatives, this will just ruin everything for all other people. You can't do this. Her like bazillion fans are definitely too young to vote. Ah. No. Stop.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Let's say it's all true. Who gives a fuck? Endorsements have been a thing forever.

Do they want to burn her at the stake for witch craft like it's fucking 1724 because she's controlling people's minds and stealing their ~~erections~~ elections?

[-] butterflyattack@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Do they want to burn her at the stake for witch craft like it's fucking 1724

That is a bit further down the path they've started down with criminalising abortion. They've got to decriminalise violence against women before they can actually start burning them. They're getting there, though.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

MAGA has chosen the wrong boogeyman this time.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

There's gonna be three sides to the next civil war: secede, stay, and the swifties; and the swifties are going to have the largest army. I don't know why they think picking this fight is in any way intelligent.

[-] signor@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Political brain rot being inserted into everything now days, exhausting.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

So....talk to me like I'm a MAGA moron with less brain cells than teeth and a family tree that doesn't always fork in all the right places.

What's the problem here? Seriously. Even if Taylor Swift were personally touring the country, knocking on every single door, and telling people to vote for Biden. So? Isn't that what their staffers should also be doing so they can get re-elected? So what if she stands on the podium if the Chiefs win the Super Bowl and says that everybody in the stadium and watching at home should vote for Biden?

Like at what point does it cross from the political activism that thousands of people across the country engage in all the time to some kind of "psyop" (side note: This is the stupidest term I have ever heard, by the way), "election interference", or whatever other term they can come up with to imply what she's doing is illegal?

Are they scared that Taylor Swift commands a bigger audience than Trump? Are they worried about millions of Swifties marching in lockstep to the ballot box to vote for Biden? Are they really all that concerned because a celebrity who has so far shown absolutely no desire even dip a toe into that political shitstorm might say something that might cause people to vote for Biden?

Are these people seriously getting all worked up over a celebrity who has shown no desire to give political commentary at all simply because she might endorse Biden? Or is this another situation where they're pre-emptively setting Taylor Swift of all people up as the person to blame if Trump loses? Last time he did this, he said that everything is rigged and that's the only way he could lose. Is the party really setting up for a round 2 where they blame Taylor fucking Swift?

Because that's not going to work out for them. Taylor Swift is probably one of the biggest celebrities in the country right now, maybe only rivalled by people like the Rock. And that's a hell of a maybe. Do they think pissing off a shit-ton of Swifties in red states is going to work? Fucking LOL. Try that and they'll be lucky if all that happens is a few purple states go blue. Swifties are not going to be abandoning Taylor Swift on the word of Donald fucking Trump.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

We should consider it a faux pas for a news organization to report on the punditry of other news org that is "two steps below it".

If nbcnews wants to cover something "conservatives" are saying, they shouldn't reach deep. They should consider the twitter account End Wokeness to be so far beneath it that reporting on it directly should feel dirty.

Now if fox news or even newsmax picks it up, then maybe start attacking this nonsense. Right now it seems to the crazies that we are taking them seriously. Why else would NBC News cover it?

[-] ToastedPlanet 9 points 10 months ago

It would be like CNN reporting on our Lemmy posts. It doesn't make sense to treat Twitter as if it's the news. It's how Trump had a stranglehold on the news cycle from a White House toilet. The news couldn't stop reporting on his tweets.

If I wanted to get my news from Twitter I would go to Twitter. I go to news organizations to hear real news, not stream of consciousness thoughts from public figures. I'm concerned how much actual news we've missed because news pundits are too busy checking social media to actually report on the news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Maybe they should pray over the outcome and see whether Jesus magic is stronger than a DNC plot. It's just a regular sporting event though, wouldn't want them taking it as a confirmation of their powers if the other team wins.

Either way, I'm sure the choose-your-own-adventure political mystery novel they're writing has win and loss branches mapped out. Chiefs win? Play victim since losing means the other side obviously cheated. Chiefs lose? It's a sign that the pendulum is swinging in your favor. Both cases conveniently ignore the fact that it's just a damn football game.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wish mainstream outlets would stop propagating this nonsense as news. Stop giving them a platform.

[-] bacon_saber@fedia.io 15 points 10 months ago

Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh described Watters’ commentary as a “conspiracy theory.”

“We are going to shake it off,” she told Politico, referencing a popular Swift song.

Unexpected Pentagon humor

[-] BobVersionFour@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Pentagon humor or secret signal to the swifties? /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Sometimes I think we should all just turn around and climb back up the trees. Maybe evolve a little more.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

You are in good company.

Many were increasingly of the opinion that they'd all made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place. And some said that even the trees had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have left the oceans.

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I hope she kneels on the stage.

[-] SecretSauces@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Anything that further divides Conservatives is something I welcome. Especially when they do it to themselves.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

BWAHAHA THE EVIL PLOT TO TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT BY CAREFULLY CONTROLLING THE POSITION OF A POINTY BALL IN A FIELD OVER A SPAN OF TIME IS UNFOLDING EXACTLY AS I HAVE FORESEEN!

NOW WE JUST NEED TO CONTROL THE POSITION OF A BOUNCY BALL ON A SHINY FLOOR AND MY CURSE WILL BE UNLEASHED, ENSURING THAT ANY DIMPLED BALL HIT BY A CONSERVATIVE'S METAL STICK WILL LAND IN TREES, SAND, OR WATER.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

all this bullshit does is make this heavy metal head want to listen to Swift. Good job numbnuts.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
434 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS