719
submitted 9 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 80 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why I should never retire: because I'll starve on the street. Unfortunately I'm getting old enough that no one is going to want to employ me. So I guess I'll starve on the street and serve as an incentive to others to work harder for the man.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 25 points 9 months ago

You're ahead of your time. The trend of most of our futures right here.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 43 points 9 months ago

Cruises and golf? What a shallow, sad view of retirement. My uncle goes to Florida in the winter and fishes off of various docks and camps, and spends time with his grandkids, and ducks around with gadgets the rest of the year.

[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

They're cliches that only apply to affluent boomers.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago

When I worked at a bank I went to a work-sponsored golf outing and it was both way more fun and required way more physical effort than I was anticipating. I'm not going to go out of my way to go golfing again but I certainly won't turn down an invite if I'm ever invited golfing again

[-] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just don't confuse wanting to work for having to work.

My grandmother, who had been retired for 30 years, turned her music-writing hobby into a second career after my grandfather passed by taking on artists, getting involved with concerts, etc.

I've met plenty of very old dudes in my hobbies of archery and shooting guns who are absolute masters and charge too little too profit or nothing at all for tuning, gunsmithing, and coaching.

These have nothing to do with keep a roof over your head, and everything to do with staying sane when the expectation seems to be waiting around until you die

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

Doing nothing for years is a good way to die younger. If you can turn a hobby into a 20hr a week "job" where you pick your hours, that can very easily keep you alive.

[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

To be fair, all of those activities sound like shit.

If I'm retiring I'm playing games, reading, hiking etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

What portion of the population do you think finds their job more fulfilling than the specific activities listed - let alone being able to spend your days as you please.

...ohhhh - "We'll make sure you can't afford to do as you please, let alone survive, so you'll have to work, but making sure the workers are responsible for it means we can keep our bullshit and economic vandalism up."

[-] InputZero@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

Within the confines of the neoliberal-capitalist societies most of us on Lemmy reside in, only the most privileged get to have a fulfilling and well paying occupation. Totally agree with you. My take on the peice is that it's parodying the notion that you have to turn a hobby or unique skill into capital even well past retirement.

I've always believed that people desire an 'occupation', just something to do with your time. Anything a person finds fulfilling to do. I also believe that we've confused occupation with payed work and now the two are perceived as the same. Or maybe I'm nuts.

[-] pifox@pawb.social 22 points 9 months ago

I know a guy who left retirement because he felt purposeless. The reason we likely hate work is because we have to do it.

If I knew I didn't have to worry about money, I would consider focusing on my tech career as it's something to do rather than worrying about how to keep a job. Maybe focus on charity maybe.

Definitely keep saving for retirement, last thing you need is to HAVE TO WORK for the rest of your life.

[-] hangukdise@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

I'm with you. Aimless wandering through night and day, and consuming stuff to distract from the lack of direction in life is pleasing only to a certain point.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I’d do a different job every year just for fun and learn everything

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 20 points 9 months ago

Pleasure cruises, golf and tracing the family tree are not that fulfilling

I agree with this opinion.

... you should never retire.

I'd retire tomorrow if I had the financial security to do so.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

"Pleasure cruises, golf, and tracing the family tree."

What the authors' retired parents did while waiting for grandkids.

A wild guess, but I'll make it.

[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I've been ten years disabled to the point that I don't have a job. My life has been more fulfilling in that decade than it ever was in my able bodied, over worked previous life.

I take care of my household, I volunteer where I'm able to, I seek out new topics to learn just out of curiosity, and I have a heap of different hobbies I bounce between. Sure, I get bored sometimes, but it's a much cleaner boredom than the kind I got at work.

No way I'm the only one who can very much enjoy an unemployed life. That article is a bunch of bullshit.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Why The Economist Can Get Fucked

[-] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

That's not what gaslighting means, OP.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago

It's one of those terms people are so rabidly eager to use that any excuse will do. Look at what happened to 'reboot'.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 10 points 9 months ago

Even the person in their little splash graphic looks like they're hiding their pain

[-] havid_dume@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

Wait, it's a column called Bartleby about working more than you want to?

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

They aren't even hiding it anymore.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

What's the significance of the name?

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Story by Melville about a guy who doesn't want to work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

This has got to be satire right?

[-] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I don't think it is... I really thought it would be, but it appears to be dead serious.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

My parents have spent the decades of their retirements volunteering and helping their neighbors.

[-] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Economist has not changed a single bit since the day Lenin dropped that qoute

The Journal That Speaks for the British Millionaires

[-] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

There are a lot of bits of my job enjoy, when I retire I shall just putter about and spend some time doing those bits and get paid less money for doing it

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One of the reasons I decided to leave the US. Yes, the Economist is British but the US has the same problem. I realized chances are I will never save enough for retirement, my 401k planner even says so. So I am moving back to the country that allowed my father to retire in his 50s. 10 years ago when I started working in the US I didn’t expect this outcome, and the longer I stay here the longer it will take me to improve my conditions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I’m going to retire even harder now

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

So I don't get it.

One side of corporate mouth: Old people are too expensive and they don't obey. We need to fire them so we can hire cheap, malleable, young people.

Other side of corporate mouth: Old people must work until they physically collapse and die at their station. There is therefore no room to hire additional workforce from the younger generation.

[-] DriftinGrifter 7 points 9 months ago

The goal is to have an seeming excess of workers to drive salaries down and hire young people who don't know better and have fit boddies

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Not working, however, is quite fulfilling.

[-] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I have a job where it takes up about 25% of my day to accomplish my work, and the other 75% of the time is spent doing whatever I like and watching my son.

It’s pretty goddamn fulfilling.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
719 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

8282 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS