719
submitted 9 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

So I don't get it.

One side of corporate mouth: Old people are too expensive and they don't obey. We need to fire them so we can hire cheap, malleable, young people.

Other side of corporate mouth: Old people must work until they physically collapse and die at their station. There is therefore no room to hire additional workforce from the younger generation.

[-] DriftinGrifter 7 points 9 months ago

The goal is to have an seeming excess of workers to drive salaries down and hire young people who don't know better and have fit boddies

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the correct answer

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
719 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

8282 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS