296

"We have issued the last package that we had withdrawn and for which we had funding," John Kirby said. White House National Security Council strategic communications coordinator John Kirby said at a briefing Thursday that "the assistance we were providing has come to a halt."

The White House official also said it is very important that Congress continues to approve the allocation of money to Ukraine. He stressed that Kiev needs help more urgently during the winter period.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 194 points 9 months ago

Putin is going to give all of his U.S. congressional pawns a big bonus this week.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 73 points 9 months ago

MTG and Boebert will be dining out at the finest roadside BBQ restaurant in their districts tonight

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 40 points 9 months ago

maybe even see a movie, exchange dick pics..

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

a nice handjob between courses

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

It's sad to watch these world leaders who understand long strategy use the short American attention span to twist global politics to their own ends.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Ruble isn't doing great tho 🤣

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

That's fine, he'll just take the money out of one of his Swiss bank accounts.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I could have sworn that The Swiss froze all Russian accounts. Like I vaguely remember a major headline that The Swiss had broken a several hundred year "neutrality" streak.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago

I think it's OK to put the blame where appropriate here. "U.S. Republican Congressional pawns."

[-] MightBe@lemmy.world 95 points 9 months ago

The headline is a bit misleading, as you can see in the 2nd paragraph of the submission text, it's the current round of assistance that has halted, and they're pushing for Congress to continue their support of Ukraine.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago

Purposely so, that site was using sources and links to RT news.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, the site is suspect. The article uses the Russian spelling "Kiev" instead of the Ukranian "Kyiv," which is a giveaway that the site might be spreading Russian propaganda. Also:

Argentina seems to show a particularly interesting trend. The country has the region’s highest number of RT online readers, and, in 2014, it was one of the first countries in the region to allow RT to broadcast on public television. Current Argentine President Alberto Fernandez has since added Telesur, the Venezuelan television network, to his country’s basic national television service. Telesur now streams Russian propaganda and disinformation to 83% of the Argentine population. Given the reach of these outlets, it is an unlikely coincidence that 67.4% of Argentinian residents said in 2020 that they view Russia favorably.

https://www.bfna.org/digital-world/growing-audiences-and-influence-russian-media-in-latin-america-7wlrwqpupm/

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 66 points 9 months ago

It's clear that Ukraine is of "National Security Interests". So I vote we just take a lil bit of the budget allocated for military spending and use it where it would be best served.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago

it's mostly a gear refresh for our military anyway. we send them stuff we have stockpiled, then we spend the allocated money on new shit for us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I say we send volunteers from the US military directly, and all their equipment too. I’m sure we can find plenty of right wing dumbasses in the ranks to chew up. Solves three problems at once!

[-] splicerslicer@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I say that if we're volunteering other people's lives we start with yours. You can't simultaneously say that the Russian military threat is real and also that people in the military have disposable lives. That's precisely how Republicans view the military.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago
[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

i can post peoples world as a counter source

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

The Kurds welcome Ukraine in joining the long list of groups abandoned and left in ruins by the US after being promised support to fight their enemy as long as needed.

Biden needs to focus on committing Genocide now. He has no time for Ukrainians beating an invasion. Surely Zeloonsky understands, he unconditionally supports israel's genocide himself.

[-] Atom@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Except this is Biden's Whitehouse continuing to tell Congress to approve aid and the GOP blocking that. This was the last package the US could provide without further congressional action. That's not likely as long as GOP runs the house. Biden and the Democratic party have been pretty lock step in providing aid.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

what does Biden's whitehouse do to sidestep congress when giving money to Israel, then?

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

It did not. It allowed Israel to make a purchase with money Israel has that Congress would have approved anyway a little faster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

I'm gonna start a bingo card about shit Lemmings say about US politics. This exaggerated and mostly inaccurate rhetoric is really grating.

[-] nbafantest@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

It really is wild how ignorant people are on here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nbafantest@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Biden has nothing to do with this, and if it were up to Biden, we would continue sending help to ukraine.

You are so far up your own ass

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

What a cop out. If Biden put the same effort into getting Ukraine weapons as he does for israel he could certainly find a way. He just doesn't.

Just like how Biden can't fix the student loans because "muh Republicans". It's Good cop Bad cop and you're still falling for it.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

What a cop out. If Biden put the same effort into getting Ukraine weapons as he does for israel he could certainly find a way. He just doesn’t.

You realize he's President, and not King, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Take the Israel weapon donations, ship them through a sketchy ukranian subcontractor in Ukraine, "lose them" in such a way the ukraine government "aquires" them. Two problems solved.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

We could send all of the people fighting the war on drugs, they're used to achieving nothing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
296 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19077 readers
2760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS