235
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

New York lost more residents – and at the largest rate – in 2023 than any other state, despite an overall rise in the U.S. population, according to U.S. Census data.

The bureau released a map showing the percentage change in state populations between July 2022 and July 2023 – New York stands out as the only state colored a deep orange, a label for a percentage change of -0.5 or more.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 102 points 10 months ago

if you can work remotely then why live in a closet?

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 68 points 10 months ago

In order to live next to all the city stuff? Some people like cities after all, and more space is more space to clean

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I am so country that the only time I ever visited a city I got vertigo and couldn’t look in any direction but down.

It wasn’t even a huge city. It was Charlotte NC.

When I was a kid I dreamed of going to a city and playing music and being a part of the culture.

The girls got to me though and I have instead repopulated a rural area. :p

I have 7 kids, 2 adopted, 5 biological.

My guitar is used almost exclusively to play Yellow Submarine and sing the family’s names in place of yellow. “We all live in little Abby’s submarine, in mommy’s submarine, in daddy’s submarine.”

My youngest thinks Beatlemania is still a thing. First thing every morning. “Daddy, I want my Beatles.” Sister comes in swinging demanding Pinkfong.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago
[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Wow, your comment is more pointless than mine. Good job!

[-] DinosaurSr@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

Damnit. Now you got "we all live in daddy's submarine" stuck in my head

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Klystron@sh.itjust.works 31 points 10 months ago

The literal endless abundance of things to do. Idc if my place is a closet if I'm never in it. Obviously if you're raising a 5 person family it's harder, but if you're solo or DINK then why wouldn't you

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Solo converting to DINK here, and for me, after spending years in a city, basically while there's tons to do in a city, there's only a relatively small portion of it that I actually want to do.

Combine that with my love of outdoor hobbies which are all farther from me while living in a city...

And at this point, for me, it's more about finding the smallest city that offers me most of what I like about cities while being small enough that I lose as much of the negatives as possible, with bonus points for a city that's small enough for me to live on the edges, where I can have a house with a yard and a garage, while being within a 10 minute drive of city center, but also less than 30 minutes from outdoor recreation opportunities.

I'm also at the age where "stay home" is often my preferred choice of thing to do, so having a spacious, comfortable home where I can enjoy living is a major consideration. A 500 sqft 1BR that I share with a roommate or two ain't cutting it.

Different people like different things, and while cities provide a lot, there's also a lot they don't.

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

pollution, noise, lack of nature, and depending on the city crime and corruption

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

There's no corruption quite like deep country corruption. Oh, you're dating the sheriff's daughter? Well we'll just look the other way...

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

even withstanding, the other issues are still present. I'm not saying cities are hellscapes, but they are lacking a few advantages that rural areas have. I like touching my own plot of dirt on this pale blue dot. My own piece of Earth. There is nothing like the nutrient overload from the first of the seasons garden fresh backyard tomato grown from last years compost. Or building random projects; or just lying on the ground looking at the stars anytime I want. In my book no amount of money would be worth sacrificing all that to live in a dense city for me personally. But this is just my outlook, I understand many other people value things differently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

New York is a huge state. Why would you need to live in a closet?

[-] june@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Nearly half the state population is in NYC alone. Expand that out to the nyc metropolitan area within New York, and you’re getting close to 3/4 of the state population.

It’s quite reasonable to assume that the vast majority of the folks that left New York were leaving NYC.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

I think what they're saying is that if people wanted to leave NYC, they could stay in State and have more room.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

Blue states going down, red states going up. The electoral college will fuck us all.

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Outside of NYC, NY is a red state. But will 100,000 have that great an influence on the electoral college? It doesn't sound like a lot in a population of 19 million.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

There are pockets of NY, outside of NYC, that are blue. The big areas that are red are mostly rural counties. But land doesn't vote, people do, so it doesn't matter if 1,000 people in a huge area vote red when 100,000 people in a small city vote blue.

You're right that NYC helps keep us blue, but they aren't the only ones. In 2020, NY voted for Biden over Trump 60.8% to 37.7%. If we removed NYC's counties, NY would have still voted for Biden, but at a much closer 52.4% to 45.9%.

[-] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 10 points 10 months ago

Not alone. It would have to lose ~3% relative to other states to lose a vote. However, this is just one year and southern states are all gaining people at twice the rate New York is losing them, so theoretically a blue vote could be flipping to a red vote every few years just from the amount of people leaving blue states.

Note that when New York loses Congressional seats, the legislature will presumably gerrymander them such that the Republicans in New York are eliminated, so it shouldn't affect Congress at all.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

watches the flood of blue tech people swarming to NC

yeah, I'm not sure the vote will flip that way. It doesn't take much to impact these tiny population red states.

[-] june@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

The geographic majority of Washington state is red, but the state is consistently blue. Because land doesn’t vote.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 months ago

It depends on who is moving. It doesn’t help Dems to run up the score in California and New York, so having people leave might actually help. If some of those educated progressive knowledge workers move to cities in the south, it could make a huge difference.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Nice take.

I saw the map and had the same dismal overall reaction but this is a very valid point!

[-] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

Unless blue people moving to Texas and Florida flip those states blue, in which case red might be done for good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] errer@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Moving to states that have banned abortion, smart move dumbasses.

[-] KRAW@linux.community 41 points 10 months ago

Believe it or not, people might not always have abortion at the top of their list when they're moving. In fact I'm willing to bet cost of living is near the top of their list.

[-] rawrthundercats@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

Spot on. Migration is a major factor in affecting political change anyway.

Some of these comments are so out of touch. The irony is that people who blanket support pro choice will go extinct as they abort more of their children over time or don't reproduce at all (the people above you in this chain). Conservative people don't abort (now by law) - their population will grow. Thus more anti-abortion laws will happen.

[-] Snoozemumrik@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Nice, managed to sneak in the great replacement theory with your anti-choice rhetoric

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KRAW@linux.community 19 points 10 months ago

According to previous studies on who gets abortions, a lot of people getting abortions are people who have already had children, so your latter point doesn't really check out.

[-] falcunculus@jlai.lu 17 points 10 months ago

People who are pro choice might still choose to have children.

People don't necessarily inherit the political opinions of their parents, and can change their outlook over time.

People can spread their ideas through other methods than reproduction, such as debate, educating other people's children, or sharing their opinion on Lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tills13@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

It's people moving from places where they actually want to live (because of qol) to places where they can afford to live. Though it'd be interesting to see like a "true" cost of living for these places.

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Yeah I don't get that at all. I had several female co-workers who accepted relocation packages to Texas when my company offered them right when Texas started passing anti-abortion laws.

I figured it was none of my business to ask why they did but man...they are either really smart and wanting to flip the state blue or they aren't thinking it's going to affect them.

No amount of money would make me want to move to Texas or Florida, or anywhere the Alt-right has a strong political hold

[-] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

They don’t think it will happen to them.

Yknow despite literally all metrics of quality of life, health, and safety being even worse in red states than the already pathetic US average.

Why is it that every conservative leaning government worldwide is currently in a self destructive spiral while socialist societies are getting better and better in all measurable metrics?

Curious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rosymind@leminal.space 7 points 10 months ago

My guess is that they have the means (funds, paid time off) to travel out of state, if needed.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Having just moved from Texas to the north east, people in the northeast are clueless to how bad it actually is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The social services and community involvement are better in Indiana than they were (and appear to still be, though I no longer have direct experience there) in WNY. Health insurance was better in NY, though. If I go back to die there, it will only be for the sake of nostalgia and not any belief that the remainder of my life would be better.

[-] DLSantini@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

Louis Rossmann would be proud.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I was wondering what would happen to gentrified neighborhoods once they ratched up the cost of living so high that the gentrifiers couldn't afford it.

[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago

I'm curious how many people are just leaving the US entirely. Technically this probably wouldn't represent it since expats are still counted as a resident of whatever state you lived in last untill you revoke your citizenship.

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"This is really worrying. Maybe we should start considering how to improve the economic condition of the middle cla..."

"!!! LET'S MAKE ABORTION ILLEGAL!!!!"

"... but that wouldn't help t..."

"🎉🎉🎉🎆🎇🎆🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲!!!!!MMMMMERICAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🎇🎆🎇🇺🇲🎆🎊🎊🎊🎊"

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

moving to places in the south because initially was cheaper and driving up prices such as property taxes for the ones already there

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

People are moving to states that build

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 30 points 10 months ago

Because companies don't want to build in places with strong labor protections.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Well duh they have to be quick. If they're not gonna steal the houses someone else will.

https://youtu.be/KNqozQ8uaV8

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I have a strong gut feeling that cities will become as dystopian sci-fi foretold. Elite only zones, private police forces etc.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 18 points 10 months ago

That is part of the draw of moving to a place like Florida. You can live in a private corporation rather than a town, so the corporation can do things like hire private security and ensure and collective amenities only get used by those who own a part of the community.

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I moved from Maryland to Western New York in 2023. Apparently me and my family weren't enough to move the needle.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
235 points (100.0% liked)

News

23305 readers
3236 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS