634

Say

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 87 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This isn't the gotcha that you think it is. Inflation is kept at a positive number on purpose. Deflation causes a self-reinforcing spiral that brings everyone's wealth down. If inflation is too high that's a problem too, but it's less of a problem than deflation.

... With that said, the huge amount that prices have gone up recently is caused by corporate profiteering, which is a serious issue that needs to be addressed.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

A sane economic take on lemmy?! Blasphemy.

I'll add this; Stop buying shit. I'm not talking rent and food. I'm talking "consumer confidence" stuff. If you don't need it to live, stop.

Example; Ammo got wildly overpriced. So we stopped buying. Like magic, prices tanked! Ain't that crazy?

Of course that's stupid oversimplified, but the basic idea is sound.

Locally, people were bitching about Taco Bell's quality. OK. Stop buying Taco Bell. They'll either crash (that store) or correct. Win-win.

I would love a legislative way to stop corporations from wildly profiteering off our asses, but I don't know what that looks like.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The corporations are absolutely aware that people have stopped being price conscious.

I understand everyone who can afford a $6 case of coca cola can also afford a $12 case. At some point you have to just choose not to buy it, or the price will just keep rising.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, you are the one making the logical fallacy of assuming they are defending the exact opposite... They're basically just saying, "inflation bad", and you come in and say, "deflation bad, too!".

OK? They weren't defending deflation? You even admit inflation has been out of hand lately...

[-] Mindlight@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You spelled "corporate market manipulation" wrong.

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Why does deflation bring your wealth down? If I saved miney in a deflationary period my purchasing power would go up. Deflation means the amount of goods you can buy with the same currency increases over time, inflation means the amount of goods you can buy over time goes down. So actually deflation makes your wealth go up it seems to me.

[-] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If you already have money, deflation is good for your net financial position, sure. If you work for your money, deflation could mean your boss has to either cut your wages, or fire you. Even if that money can buy more, people are very unwilling to take a pay cut.

That means if there's a sudden (but small) drop in productivity in an industry, inflation can paper over it, and deflation amplifies it, and potentially means the industry collapses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's good for you in the very short term, but bad quickly after that. It makes everyone want to hold onto their cash because your cash becomes more and more valuable the longer you hold on to it. So people start buying way less, and businesses bring in less and less money, so they lower prices more to try to entice you to buy, but the dropping prices only make you want to wait to buy even longer, this keeps spiraling downward and businesses keep bringing in less and less money, and so very soon they have to start firing people, and then more and more companies wind up out of business, causing more and more unemployment, and on and on and on, for everyone involved it all goes very bad.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/what-is-deflation/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Efficient at extracting wealth from humans

[-] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

And giving all of that yummy wealth to a small handful of scummy humans.

[-] Myr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago

I am not even saying that capitalism is remotely acceptable but prices going up doesn't imply inefficient of the system. Inflation could be a reason and inflation says nothing about efficiency.

Shit on capitalism. Be my guest. Just don't make bad arguments.

[-] Kiwi_Girl 13 points 1 year ago

I thought they were coming at it from a supply & demand angle.

Inelastic demand on food and housing yet prices still go up.

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

That might be the case but generalized statement that are wrong, are wrong.

Don't generalize to the point of failure of your point. Especially in public, the in-group might understand you but the out-group will misunderstand and judge you and your ideology based on their misunderstanding.

[-] Haha@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ok explain why the prices in my local supermarkets go up every three weeks. Go ahead. Whats the argument.

[-] natuhhlee 7 points 1 year ago

I'm not an expert in macroeconomics but I'd say some global effects are likely due to the invasion of Ukraine (global exporter of wheat) ABC News and US Gov, the rising price of oil (some fertilizer uses fossil fuels)NBC, and possibly that the world has changed due to Covid and that a lot of things had shifted along with it CNN. A country that once was in the top 5 of grain exporters dropping off the global map is going to shake things quite a bit and oil unfortunately affects so many different markets.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Because it's efficient at transferring wealth upwards.

Normally a strong democracy with multiple parties, checks and balances would help stop this. But the new META in economics is to just buy politicians to do your bidding for you. Kinda hoping the Supreme Court will patch that at some point, but it's not looking likely.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I would be a social democrat for just that reason. But with climate change looming, my options have narrowed.

[-] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Definitely harder to patch out features then bugs.

[-] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 year ago

It is efficient, in increasing the wealth of the wealthy.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

The system is working as intended.

The rich get richer

.... The system is working as intended.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On the contrary, this is the proof that it is efficient. The right question to make is: Efficient for whom?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I realize this isn't really the place for this discussion but capitalism doesn't know what the word "efficient" means. Is it efficient to have to buy the same thing twice? Is it efficient to only make cheap shitty and yet still overpriced versions of everything for the consuming public, shit that is designed to fail? Is pollution efficient? Is ruining everyone's lives efficient? Pointless jobs? Rich people? These things are efficient the way fucking for virginity is efficient. The way Elon's Twitter has been efficient. The way shitting the bed is efficient. Which is to say, it's really fucking not.

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is the most efficient way of extracting as much value from one’s employees, and sales from one’s customers as possible.

Efficiency isn’t always a good thing, such as in this case.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's broader that that: it's the most efficient way of extracting money from everything else in general.

Hence just how common it is to see large companies getting massive subsidies or having laws written to benefit them (notice, for example, the Disney Corporation rigging the system to extract more value from the broader society by getting the Copyright terms extended ahain and again), none of which is sales or employment related.

Capitalism doesn't limit itself to things of a trading nature (which includes employment, which is basically people selling their work to others) and that's the core of the problem with it: it naturally corrupts anything around it which can help provide not just trade advantages but even force the rest of society to give larger entities "free" money even outside trade (subsidies, bailouts) or forcing into being paid for that which would be naturally free (i.e. copyright, water rights, even land).

Some people think Crony Capitalism is not real Capitalism, but is actually real Capitalism in it's purest form: the best ROI in this game of who makes the most money comes from buying the referees and those who make the rules.

[-] Kjatten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Couldn't have said it better. Our society is bound to collapse, and it's us, "the peasants", which will be dealt the blow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

It's efficient at exploitation

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Capitalism isn't concerned with efficiency, merely the most direct route to monopoly.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Wish more understood this.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The free market is an illusion at this point. The monopolies killed it.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think you may be right.

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

The Legal Illegal monopolies.

[-] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Guys I love you and support most of the changes you want to make regarding the way we govern ourselves.

But sometimes I see some posts that make me wonder. I want to help solve capitalism and it's problems. So I'm studying macroeconomics I'm studying economic theories in general.

Sorry,and with all due respect, sometimes there are some dumbass posts that show a complete lack of understanding of how things work in the world economy.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is a meme, not meant to be taken seriously. (Although more people seem to be forgetting this)

As far as dumbasses... Welcome to the Internet

[-] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Since you didn't explain why, I will. If society has deflation all investments stop because people can hold their money and it will grow. If you have a small amount of inflation then those will large amounts of capital are forced to invest it or lose it over time. Inflation is basically a wealth tax for non investors. Obviously inflation that is too high acts much like a wealth tax that is too high. Inflation effects the rich and poor unless they invest their capital which the rich will often do better. Over all thoigh a small amount of inflation is good for an economy to force people to invest capital in something.

[-] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Genuine question: does that mean deflation is never a good thing? Like, right now prices are skyrocketing (tbf, not just due to inflation, but it's not like they'll ever go down again). It would take ages for wages to catch up properly, if it ever will (since it could be argued that we were still catching up from before), so wouldn't deflation be helpful here?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

so when do minimum wages start going up?

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, would've been better if it said, "then why do profits keep going up," because a theoretical efficient market should eventually result in zero profits.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Haha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nice shitpost lol

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Companies that are structured to maximize short term shareholder value need to make extra profits at all costs.

Supply lines were strained during the pandemic, which led to drastic price increases. Supply lines stabilized and the pandemic subsidized. Prices didn’t go down? Why?

Because the companies that set prices need to make more money this quarter to make the shareholders happy. And they bribe the politicians and the judges and the regulators to control the system at every level.

These rich assholes doomed our world to destruction and our “leaders” were too greedy and small minded to stop them.

Enjoy the ride down

[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Because "number go up" is all the system cares about. Damn you living creatures for opposing it. The system shall prevail.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Isn't inflation good for consumers? Deflation means what you already have becomes more valuable -- so the rich would gain a significant boost to their finances since they already have so much. Inflation though would mean they lose a significant amount, and it becomes easier for the working class to break into the rich people bubble.

[-] fromaj_debite@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Only if salary go up

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No, it just means everybody can buy less with the same amount of money. If you're broke, you're still going to be broke at high inflation, and it'll hurt a lot worse.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's very efficient at extracting wealth from the lower classes.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Prices go up because wages go up, and wages go up because prices go up. Which seems like it can't possibly be the explanation, and while it is of course a simplification, it really is surprisingly accurate.

Inflation is mostly there so that people can keep getting raises and doing better than they did yesterday, without actually moving forward. It's kind of like the Shepard tone. Always infinitely seeming to rise in pitch, but never actually doing so. Or if you are unfamiliar with that reference, it's like a stairmaster. Those stair based exercise machines. You constantly go up a set of stairs that is constantly moving down at the same speed.

Each step feels meaningful, but by the time you are ready to take your next step, you are relatively exactly where you were before. You constantly have more and more money over the course of your life, and to a small degree by the end of a long career you should actually be a little bit ahead if everything went well for you, just in time for you to retire and remove your higher than average salary from the pool to offset someone else gaining a raise that is slightly ahead of inflation.

This is of course all a gross oversimplification. But it's the "slightly accurate model" first step, that leads to learning all the rest in actual depth that changes some of the specifics by a tiny bit if you look closely enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Because unregulated capitalism gets wiley the more rope you let out.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
634 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5609 readers
725 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS