1505
But muh bootstraps! (media.kbin.social)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 125 points 11 months ago

You know what's mad. My brother in law on benefits blames other people on different benefits

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Disabled veteran relative who gets mad about other disabled people parking in handicap parking....

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

They should have ten different levels of handicap parking passes and then we could watch them all fight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

My step dad, on disability for his knees, yelling about single mothers getting food stamps.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cynar@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago

Like a tortoise without a shell on.

[-] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

Same as the immigrants aren't stealing your job, the greedy capitalist are giving those jobs to immigrants to cut down their bottom line, and they love nothing more when you blame the immigrants.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Immigrants spend less on frivolous bullshit and send money to other countries. Businesses lose out on that end, especially tech companies and wealthy industries.

Manufacturing and manual labor jobs love immigrants because they can pay them minimum wage for horrible working conditions compared to your typical minimum wage 3rd+ generation white worker.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Onaltau@lemm.ee 31 points 11 months ago

"Benefits" is a grotesque use of the word. Whoever came up with the idea of calling social security "Benefits" is an evil genius.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

there's nothing inherently wrong with the word "benefits" anyway. It's a positive word. people have come to villianize the word, associating it with those who mooch off the government. But no. benefits are not a bad thing, and people who receive them are not bad people. I agree with the John krasinski meme up there. Rich people are the enemy. poor people are the victims and deserve all the "benefits" they can possibly get.

edit: changed the word "demonize" to "villainize" which was on the tip of my tongue but it took me two days for the right word to come to me. I'm quite pleased with my brain for finally getting it. That's why I'm including this loquacious edit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

Can we see a version that reads “the rich refusing the pay their fair share…”?

[-] Prunebutt@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

Make the memes you wanna see in the world!

[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 months ago

they'rethesamepicture.jpg

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago

That and they're working on every way to drain you tax money too

Infuriating video about mounjaro weight loss shots potentially bankrupting medicaid: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UrjAhDQKpS0&pp=ygUieW91dHViZSBtb3VuamFybyBiYW5rcnVwdCBtZWRpY2FpZA%3D%3D

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

And the irony is that "I pulled myself up by my bootstraps" literally used to be an idiom about blatantly lying that you did something impossible before the boomers appropriated it.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

Sadly, not entirely true. When too many people have to depend on welfare money because rich people demand too much rent and pay too low wages, then everyone will get less.

But it's still rich people's fault so it's the same picture.

[-] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

This.

Technically, welfare is an expense, but, it:

a)is caused by the economic situation caused by the rich; b)makes people more economically secure, thereby improving, for everyone, the salary negotiating power and ability to build new enterprises, which return money to the economy; c)may save you personally if things turn south. And they always can.

All that right-wing bullshit about economic freedom and not having to pay for losers has been disproven two centuries ago, yet people prefer to listen to talking heads that will never mention this nuance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 11 months ago

If you think they dont negatively affect you then you probably havent lived around them. You have neighbors getting drunk every night staying up late because they have no job and then when you go to work they rob your house. They're overly aggressive and they treat the house/area like shit by smashing bottles and littering. Obviously not everyone on the benefit does this since I'm on the benefit and I don't do this.

If there were no billionaires it wouldn't change my life. Corporations would still dominate the world as hard as they do.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

...since I’m on the benefit...

You are literally this meme, bruv.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

If there weren't any billionaires, your net worth would be about $100K higher than it currently is ($400K for a family of four). And that would provide you about $4K in yearly passive income ($16K for family of four).

You would own a part of those corporations worth that $100K and would have a say in how they operate.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 months ago
[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Based on the concept of sharing, parents should have taught it to you before you could talk.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] echo64@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Aside from the fact that your life would be dramatically different without billionaires, you'll find that employed people do that shit too.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

I think you are mixing different groups of people and pinning that on receiving benefits. As if receiving benefits is what caused them to be alcoholics or receiving benefits makes them steal from others.

There are good and there are shitty people, on the other hand social benefits are a safety net when you experience a bad life situation you can survive it without doing on the street. Disability, unemployment. Do you think you can receive unemployment forever? It's value is based on how much you were making in previous job (I think it is 2/3 of income (in more generous states) and has a hard limit on the maximum which is relatively low) and it has a time limit (I think 6 months or less).

Somebody who breaks to other people's homes don't need unemployment and to them that amount of money is laughable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Holy shit lol

[-] pikmeir@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Yes, but don't blame the benefits for terrible people being terrible. Good people and terrible people can both use benefits the same way they can both drive on the freeway.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

I truly hope no one in your household ever becomes severely disabled and unable to work. Without those benefits, many more disabled people would be homeless and starving (too many already are). It’s already prohibitively expensive to be sick in the US, and people who have worked hard routinely lose their health benefits when they can no longer work, forcing them to ration healthcare and make hard choices between medicine and housing/food.

Even if you personally are able to work and keep your insurance, having a disabled child can utterly destroy your financial security and future.

You’re judging all benefits recipients based on the behaviour of a small minority, when without those benefits, many disabled and elderly people would starve and die.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 8 points 11 months ago

If they have to rob your house to be able to live, then their benefits probably don't sustain them.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

"People" like you should be forced to leave society.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mdurell@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I pulled myself up by my bootstraps. Of course, I was privileged enough to actually have boots with straps. It seems fewer and fewer people have these anymore and that's a damn shame.

[-] hanekam@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

People being on benefits maybe.

I've had occasion in my life to spend some time around people who are on benefits because of mental health and drug abuse, and some of those persons were a nightmare to deal with, and absolutely affected my life negatively. Many conditions that put people on benefits also make them very unpleasant to be around. The key is to understand that they would still be difficult to deal with if they weren't on benefits, and desperation would only make them more of a nuisance.

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 12 points 11 months ago

Sounds like they don't have enough benefits.

[-] hanekam@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

There are problems no amount of money can solve

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 10 points 11 months ago

Not everything can be fixed easily, but money will go a long way towards supporting and alleviating pretty much any problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

fuck yeah. This is the dumbest shit. Allowing entrenched media structures, virtually always owned by corporate interests, to shape who the boogeyman is. Tip: it's never the corporate interests who control the entrenched media structures.

[-] queezywheezy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

This is a hilarious take considering the Bedlam unfolding in Dublin tonight.

Scumbags living their entire lives on some of the most generous benefits in Europe decide to burn the city because.... ? Racism?

Nothing to do with Billionaires.

Just generational scumbags trying to 1up their parents.

Get a grip.

[-] GetPsyched@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

After checking the news it only mentions that the protests were due to children being stabbed?

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 5 points 11 months ago

I don't know if there was a rumour that the suspect was a non-white person, or just that the stabbing of multiple people resembles that of an Islamic terrorist attack, but all the rioters appear to be pushing anti-immigration rhetoric (which usually directly translates as anti-POC/Islamic immigration rhetoric).

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Rightwingers aren't people. They're lucky beating them in public still counts as a crime.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Can grab those bootstraps if you can’t afford boots 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
1505 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5417 readers
2425 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS