235
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Mike Johnson’s meteoric elevation from an under-the-radar congressman from Louisiana to second-in-line to the U.S. presidency sent journalists, Democrats and Republicans alike to uncover information about the personal and professional history of the most right-wing and least experienced House Speaker in history, who took the top job on Wednesday.

On the day Johnson was voted in, several major right-wing social media accounts on X, formerly known as Twitter, began circulating clips of an interview Johnson gave to PBS in 2020, in which he told journalist Walter Isaacson that the police killing of George Floyd was “an act of murder” and called for “systemic change.” Notably, Johnson said in the interview that he had learned about racism in America through the experience of raising a Black son, Michael.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 166 points 2 years ago

Wait, what? This isn't something to be criticized for. Having a black adopted son and learning the realities of racism in America and learning from it is a good thing. He should be criticized for all the other shit, but not this.

[-] memfree@lemmy.ml 113 points 2 years ago

They aren't complaining that he had a black son, but that he's an "undercover Democrat" because he's stated that he learned about racism from the kid, saying things like, “Michael being a Black American, and Jack being white Caucasian. They have different challenges,” he said. “My son Jack has an easier path. He just does.”

Further, there was a question as to if the kid was real since there are no photos. That led to the new clarification:

Speculation about whether Michael was a real person prompted Johnson’s office to clarify. “When Speaker Johnson first ran for Congress in 2016, he and his wife, Kelly, spoke to their son Michael—who they took in as newlyweds when Michael was 14 years old,” said Corinne Day, Johnson’s communications director, in a statement first reported by Newsweek. “At the time of the Speaker’s election to Congress, Michael was an adult with a family of his own. He asked not to be involved in their new public life.” Day added that Johnson “maintains a close relationship with Michael to this day.”

So if we are to believe him, there are no photos because that is the way the now-adult kid wants it.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

I'm not going to believe a dang thing any Conservative says without concrete evidence and peer review.

If the black kid adoption story is real, there will be photos, and someone will be able to produce them. If there are no photos, it's all a lie.

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

You should apply that practice to all politicians. They never tell the truth if a lie will serve.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago

So if we are to believe him, there are no photos because that is the way the now-adult kid wants it.

Let's start a new conspiracy theory that he doesn't actually have a Black son. It'll go viral in a day. Space lasers!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not saying you're wrong. But the right has a habit of only showing empathy only when it directly affects them.

Black people deserve protection from the law, yes. But let's not pretend that he'd change his tune about LGBT people in a split second if his son turned out to be gay or trans.

[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Black people don’t deserve protection from the law. Black people deserve equal treatment under the law.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 45 points 2 years ago

It’s not at all something to criticize, it’s noble to adopt a child. It’s his party base that will pillory him.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 years ago

He hasn't legally adopted this "son" and he's not shown in any family photos.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

And he had a history of making up bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Teon@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

So his 'black son' was born in 1985 and is now 38.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

Lol the secret exposed news that he's actually not racist is a controversy, but there's zero issues against his intense anti gay stance.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

That kid’s going to be so scarred.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

They all lie to get to power. They all tell us what we want to hear so we will elevate them to this power. If a politician is moving their mouth, they are lying.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

“All politicians are the same, amirite?”

No, you are wrong

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

“Nuh-uh, YoU aRe WrOnG”

Yes, meet any politician anywhere in the world, and I can guarantee that they lied somewhere about something to get to that power. I would have to lie too, it’s the game, not the players. I count bending the truth and withholding info as lying as well.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

This is such a daft take - I know plenty of local politicians - and indeed a couple of MPs local to me in the UK who have precious little "power" and work stupid hours looking after their constituents. They aren't trying to get cabinet positions or a cushy jobs. The kind of people who think 'there are some problems here I think I can solve' and sign up for what can be pretty grim work.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Good point. There are some “Mr. Smith”s out there, and yes, local level politics do have genuine helpful people. I should amend my statement to “politicians at such a high level”.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
235 points (100.0% liked)

News

38932 readers
951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS