I'm not sure id call that a tantrum, but it was pretty ridiculous. Can't even answer a simple question that goes against his narrative.
Unfortunately, I think the parts they care about would continue as "essential" while the parts everyone else cares about would shut down.
This is the worst timeline...
I hold him in contempt at all times.
Ooh, this is fun when paired with EA's anti cheating software being embedded in the kernel. Surely a foreign power like Saudi Arabia gaining kernel level access to kids computers will be taken as a serious national security concern, just like TikTok was. Right?
Edit: Shit, I ate the onion...
Edit 2: ... or did I?
If it's true that Trump is being lied to by his advisors in order to get him to act the way they want, that means there is a huge weakness in the scheme. If someone could show him definitively that his advisors are lying, it could cause him to turn on some of them.
Maybe he's being fed false information. Given how critical this all is, I could see them commissioning entire fake newscasts to show him. Hell, they could probably just show him AI newscasts given how good he is at identifying fake images.
To be fair, the US media barely take note when someone dies in ICE custody.
While I think the shirt is funny and should be worn proudly, I can see how someone might be offended for non-racist reasons. Some people might simply find the depiction of death to be offensive.
That said, it's entirely possible the offended person was a raging racist.
Edit:
This edit is for those of you who are saying that people shouldn't be offended by violence since it's on TV. I think you're missing the fact that the point entirely.
The fact that a depiction of violence is making a valid point doesn't make it less offensive. In fact, that would detract from the message. Sometimes it is important to make a statement using depictions of violence to get a point across because the violence is offensive.
That said, I think it is perfectly reasonable for someone to find this shirt objectionable for non-racist reasons. For example, many people prefer not to expose their kids to depictions of violence. I think it's this person's right to wear the shirt to make their point but the consequence of wearing it is that some people may say that they find it offensive for both non-racist and racist reasons.
Look out grandma! Those are going to become cripsy apples.
Huh, what brand? Having a smart one didn't bother me so long as it didn't require a connection, so maybe I didn't look THAT hard.
It can actually be a little hard to find models from major brands without wifi. That said, there is no reason that you have to give it access to your router. I worry that they'll start saying that a wifi connection is mandatory at some point, though.
Where dose one report hatch act violations?
Also, for those who may not be aware, the Hatch Act prohibits civil service employees from engaging in some kinds of political speech, especially trying to influence other's votes. It is intended to keep the civil service non-partisan.
The screenshot above may have come from a presidential directive but, as a former civil servant, I believe that the people who enacted that directive acted illegally. Hopefully a report would get this taken down at least and, possibly, lead to some punishment for those involved.