138
submitted 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by misk@piefed.social to c/movies@piefed.social
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 6 points 59 minutes ago

we need am army of Luigi

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 23 points 4 hours ago

Several thoughts.

  1. Imagine you have cancer and you're working through it on your spouse's Disney healthcare, but you also need to work full-time to make ends meet. You might be forced to quit your job or only do part-time hours so that you can continue on the better health insurance. Forcing people into this sort of financial dilemma is... well, I think the most accurate term is "evil."
  2. As they said in the article, this affects lower income employees more. If you're a high income employee at Disney, maybe you don't need your spouse to work. So, this will disproportionately remove lower income people from their insurance, while higher income people receive twice the healthcare benefits. This makes very little sense.
  3. This is more evidence that the very concept of tying workplace to healthcare is madness. In the end, universal healthcare is just the optimal solution.

Why don't we already have universal, single-payer healthcare? Let's not forget that it's the corporations and ultra-wealthy people who have the most sway in our government. Look, here's Disney bitching and moaning about how awful and expensive it is to offer adequate healthcare for their employees. So obviously, you'd think they should just support universal healthcare and be done with all of this healthcare expense.

But the truth is that they don't want to. They want to tie healthcare to the company because smaller companies often have worse healthcare packages because they have less negotiating power, and this is a way of enslaving people. Tying them to one company so that they can never leave. But also, make it as cheap as possible in the meantime. Reduce benefits just enough so that they constantly suffer but can't afford to leave. They want to have it both ways. Employees not getting enough benefits as well as getting enough benefits that they can't afford to leave.

This is entirely inhumane.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 7 points 2 hours ago

Per depressing non fiction novel "dying of whiteness", many poor white people don't want universal programs like health care because they don't want those people to have access. They would rather suffer and die themselves.

Many people, I'd guess like a third, are just assholes.

[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 hours ago

This is shitty, but also in any functional country, healthcare is not tied to employment

[-] rockSlayer 22 points 7 hours ago

We’re the first ones to starve, we’re the first ones to die

The first ones in line for that pie-in-the-sky

And we’re always the last when the cream is shared out

For the worker is working when the fat cat’s about

[-] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I can hear DKM performing this in my head as I read it.

[-] Switorik@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 hours ago

If you work for them and are against this in anyway, you support them by continuing to work for them. Things won't get better until people grow up and realize the corporations are not on their side.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 hours ago

So now that their spouse has lost healthcare they should quit and lose their healthcare and their income too. That will show the multi-billion dollar company!!!

Seriously? Nobody is supporting this just by continuing to work for them. Different departments of Disney are members of different unions for starters.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
138 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3806 readers
312 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS