57
submitted 1 week ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zoma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Was using 4get for a while but the instance seems to be broken, gonna try ecosia out for a while.

[-] eremophila@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago
[-] zo0@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago

Abandon search engines, normalize asking your cousins your questions again

[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This is how everyone learned games like The Floor is Lava

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Library help desk

[-] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

complicated for usa people though

[-] eremophila@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Unless something has changed, that chart is incorrect. I stopped using startpage earlier this year when they announced the inclusion of ai.

[-] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

Every single search provider mentioned includes AI as an option. Fortunately, they all gave an option to just turn it off. It's annoying, but if they find that users want these AI summaries, they need to add them as an option to compete.

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I wish more of them just had an option to highlight excerpts from pages or Wikipedia articles like google used to do exclusively. But I'm sure that harder to build :/

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do users actually want such AI summaries? Is there any good polling on this?

I mostly read about people being annoyed by companies pushing hard for AI, and trying to get rid of those unrequested summaries.

[-] eremophila@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

tuta seem to have missed the mark then, incorrect details and not including noai.duckduckgo

turning ai off is a valid (and welcome) choice, but most people don't look at settings, the default is often ai on, and updates can also change them.

in Firefox browsers and its forks:

but then in a different part of settings:

the ai setting there was defaulted to on, even with ai supposedly completely turned off in the main ai section

So I would rather use a search engine (and browser) with the default that ai is trash.

[-] Cheebus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Been paying for Kagi, i’m enjoying it

[-] arinbasu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Kagi is really good, particularly with Kagi assistant. Worth the money

[-] sunth1ef@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Honestly, Kagi is crushing it. Their search results are so quality that family members of mine have agreed it is better than google. I never thought I'd pay for search but now am honestly glad I do.

[-] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[-] AuroraSine@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago
[-] goobersmash@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Me too, via MetaGer, which lets me combine Mojeek and Brave search results.

[-] AuroraSine@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Hello. That connection thing is cool. So I have no experience with meta-search engines. I gave up on Brave after I learned that it's hosted on AWS. My only search engine is Mojeek because it's not hosted on big tech like, Azure AWS, or Google Cloud.

[-] rustbuckett@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

I've used DDG for years and really like it. I like it even more now that I've been using #emacs more because they have a text-based, or at least non-js, search page that works well in eww.

[-] SoulKaribou@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Also appreciate the Lite/HTML approach of ddg for quick searches on the phone. Much faster and lean.

Qwant used to have one too but it's been scrapped somehow

[-] zksailor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ecosia all the way, search plus the right mission

[-] vandsjov@feddit.dk 1 points 1 week ago

Also building an independent search index together with Qwant - already serving the French and German users. In their way to to drop Google and Bing

[-] LeTak@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

I liked startpage until it broke for my setup, it does not work well with proxy’s, VPN and AdBlock. DuckDuckGo is my go to engine. Maybe in the near future I will setup searx. Also , in Germany there is ecosia but it also broke because of my setup.

[-] pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Searx is not the easy one. Many instances don't work, and the working ones hardly show relevant results.

[-] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I have not enjoyed it

[-] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Self-hosted isn't as unstable because you don't end up getting blocked by throttling as often if you're the only user. Public instances tend to get hammered by bots and LLMs these days. Just put it behind a reverse proxy with a login or a VPN to keep others out. I use keycloak SSO in Traefik on a VPS, but pangolin works well for my web apps in my home. That said, it requires setup and maintenance. But no tracking since you own the server.

But TBH no generalized search engines are really good these days. They all mostly all overrun either by monetization schemes and ads or have been manipulated by SEO, so rarely give good results. I've been exploring lots of alternatives, but not many are any good.

[-] pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

What do you mean no tracking since you own your own server? If you use it alone, there is a straightforward correlation between the requests from your searxng instance and you, the dude who hosts it. The idea of searxng is that requests of many people become mixed together through an instance

[-] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, but no identification to tie that to. Sure they know the things some individual happens to search for, but they don't have my google login or advertising ID or Facebook token or any other tracking tokens to link those requests to my identity outside of that silo of the IP address, and that changes as it's sent over an anonymizing proxy. It's not perfect and if they really tried they could probably track it down, but it's rare enough and enough obfuscation that I doubt they'd care enough to do it.

[-] SuperZorro@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

It used to be amazing, but lately the providers seem to have started fighting it. It’s take a while to get it setup correctly, especially if you want not only US results.

[-] idriss@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Brave search was surprisingly good, like google when it wasn't shit.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

I could never trust Brave. You can’t be a search or browser company and also run an ad network. It’s a conflict of interest.

[-] Obcy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

I sometimes use that Marginalia search.

[-] aim4harmony@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

xprivo?Based in Luxie.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago

I've been using Qwant and it's really good, I think it's better than DDG, at least for results in Italian

[-] Amaterasu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

What do you use to replace the Google's Image search?

That is the area that I found more challenge.

[-] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Tineye, lenso.ai, picfinder? I’ve heard maybe Bing is better than Google now, but I don’t know.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

50478 readers
459 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS