Isn’t this just a Republican right of passage?
The same woman who jerked a man off in public? Her son has no sexual boundaries?! Shocker.
Wait, is this her son with the man she married after he pulled his dick out in front of minors, including the then 17-year-old Bobert, in a bowling alley?
It appears that might not be the only thing about Jayson that Rep. Boebert doesn’t want the public to know. In January 2004, when Jayson Boebert was 24, he was arrested for exposing himself to two young women at a Colorado bowling alley. His future wife Lauren Roberts (as she was then known), who was 17 at the time, was also present and was told she was no longer welcome at the bowling alley.
Jayson Boebert pled guilty to “public indecency and lewd exposure” after that incident, according to The New York Post, and was sentenced to four days in jail with a subsequent two years on probation.
It's almost as if they were trying to raise a predator.
Is this the son of the guy that exposed himself to girls in the bowling alley for fun?
Exposed himself to underaged girls
Aka, kids
I never understood the concept of the phrase “underage girl” or “underage boy” as they’re completely tautological. Once a girl comes of age she becomes a woman, and ditto for boys being men. You can’t have an “overage girl” in the same way you can’t have an “underage woman”. English denotes the difference between childhood and adulthood without needing qualification.
These days, it's used for emphasis to make sure you're properly upset about it. Try using it in a context where age doesn't matter, and you see how much implied severity it can add.
"I saw you speaking to a girl. What's up with that?"
vs
"I saw you speaking to an underage girl. What's up with that?"
One of them sounds much more like a crime.
Not only that but, boy and girl are commonly used as slang terms for women and men well into their late 20s+
I call people in their 40s and 50s boys and girls.
One of those underage girls is his mother after she married her abuser. Generational paedophilia
A true Conservative in the Epstein tradition!
I expect Mommy will make a sizeable contribution to Trump's presidential library to secure a future pardon.
He is accused of having sexual intercourse with a 17-year-old girl when he was 18, according to Tyler Boebert’s arrest affidavit written by invesigators from the Garfield County Sheriff’s Office.
I mean, not quite the same. In most western countries this would not be news or a crime.
These are state charges, which means a different sovereign is prosecuting. Colorado is a blue state too. So, I wouldn't expect her money to get her anywhere in that light.
Yeah, but Trump has some kind of Kompromat on Governor Polis. He got him to give Tina Peters clemency.
It's always the ones you suspect most.
He is accused of having sexual intercourse with a 17-year-old girl when he was 18, according to Tyler Boebert’s arrest affidavit
I understand recording the act turns this into something serious, but I mean come on, it's an 18-year-old and a 17-year-old, having sex.
The recording and posting on the internet is the crime. The sex itself was not against the law and was not included in the charges.
In a vaccum, yeah no big deal, but the next few lines details the real problem.
The police first began investigating the incident in March 2024 after videos depicting the intercourse were shared publicly on an anonymous Instagram account. Several photos and videos were posted to the Instagram account depicting people having intercourse with minors or depicting minors nude or seminude. One of the videos featured Tyler Boebert.
Officers with the Silt Police Department, in Garfield County, questioned the girl shown in the video with Tyler Boebert in February 2024, shortly after the video was believed to have been filmed, according to the affidavit. That came after someone reported the Instagram account to police in Silt. The arrest affidavit, which is nearly 50 pages long, details the police’s investigation into the Instagram account and who created it.
Investigators allege that Tyler Boebert filmed the video and shared it with others and is suspected of creating the Instagram account that featured other explicit videos.
So, another Republican pedophile ring.
Kill your local pedophile, bobo. What's the issue?
SEXUALLY ASSAULTING A CHILD? No WONDER why Republicans LOVE his Mother!
It is always those you most suspect.
Again !?
He is accused of having sexual intercourse with a 17-year-old girl when he was 18, according to Tyler Boebert’s arrest affidavit written by invesigators from the Garfield County Sheriff’s Office.
Just for context, for those of us not reading the article.
There are plenty of other reasons he's a douche, though, which are also in the article... like sharing those videos without the girl's permission on Instagram.
The 18 year old banging a 17 year old is not the issue, that stuff happens all the time and some states even have "Romeo and Juliet" laws to protect people in that situation.
The issue is that he FILMED IT AND SHARED IT WITH FRIENDS WITHOUT HER CONSENT.
Would consent even matter given she was a minor? Pretty sure even with consent you cant do that if someone is a minor.
And filming it. And distributing it.
You may want to keep on reading. There's more.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News