1063
Anti-AI solidarity (lemmy.world)

Lime Bar @limebar@mastodon.social

I am a little shocked at the lack of solidarity I see between artists working in different mediums wrt genAI.

Musicians who would never use it to make music use it to make cover art

Graphic artists reach for it to make music over their videos

Writers use it to illustrate their articles

And, considering software development an art, many use it to create web sites or apps to host their art.

None of this is necessary. All of this is harmful to the other artists.

Collaborate ffs.

Stop it.

Aug 09, 2026, 12:17 AM

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 10 hours ago

BASED

As a musician, and as a friend of many graphic artists, writers, programmers, designers, and other kinds of artists, I hate how many people just think in their own benefit. Like, they don't seem to understand that's one of the main problems, because while I use AI to create cover artz and at the same time complain about not having enough demand and about my music being stolen, which takes away my opportunities to work, a graphic artist/cartoonist could be using AI to make music for their showcases/shelves and complaining about not having enough demand and about others (me, in this case) stealing their art. What I mean is, we're both harming each other and reducing our net benefit margin, thus leading to a Pareto suboptimal.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[-] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago

I'm just going to take a moment to appreciate that they considered software development an art. It's a rare moment.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

It's funny how many non-programmers see programming as a repetitive and boring task.. Like, the whole point of it is to take boring repetitive tasks and automate them away. And the bits that are really well understood are the bits you don't need to deal with, because there's already libraries for that. Definitely an art (or a craft at least).

[-] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

One of my favourite things is to watch a programmer wax poetic about the beauty they see in good code.

It tangentially reminds me of "clocking screws", a practice in which one screws in flathead screws such that the slots are all aligned . It's easy to do, but a lot of faff; manufacturing variances means that each screw will require a slightly different number of turns to be sufficiently tight, so you need to:
" Line up the screw so the slot is aligned vertically

  • Screw it in until it's tight
  • If the slot is not aligned vertically, estimate how far off from ideal it is (i.e. if the slot ended up horizontal, then that's around 90° off from what you want)
  • Unscrew the screw, and line it up again, accounting for the angle you estimated in the previous step
  • Screw the screw back in and repeat the process if necessary.

It takes a lot of skill to reliably gauge how to do, especially because repeated screwing and unscrewing the screw can loosen the hole enough that it affects the process. Even for skilled craftsmen, it's an absurd level of work for something that, even when flathead screws were more common, most people would never notice. Nowadays, the only place I'm likely to see clockable screws are at old churches or similar

It's so persnickety and silly, but that's why I love it. I imagine that the craftspeople who care(d) about this stuff were a lot like today's programmers who wax poetic about elegance in their code. It makes me so happy whenever I peer underneath a century old pew and see clocked screws, because it makes me think about the person who put such care into a part of their work that next to no-one would even see, let alone appreciate. It is especially nice because I imagine that many of these craftspeople were of a socioeconomic class that were thought unable to appreciate Beauty and Art.

No matter the field, people will find ways to impart Beauty and Art into their craft.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Same to mathematics then again the relationship most people have with math is a far cry from the hopefully ingenious, and creative labor of what mathematicians do. Most just remember suffering to learn rules discovered by others and themselves never getting the chance to do the discovering.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I love maths, did a major in it (plus a summer project). But its also one of the hardest things I've ever done, and I never did anything that felt remotely like discovery or like creativity (though I agree it is creative). It's in a league of it's own in terms of dedication required, IMO.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] petrol_sniff_king 5 points 3 days ago

It's funny how many programmers see it the same way. Actually bugs the shit outta me, haha.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

I think a big part of the problem is that most people just can't afford each other.

Sure, you can do "paid in kind" (which has it's own complexities) but mainly there's so many overheads in life, as well as middlemen extorting out their cut that hiring a creative is cripplingly expensive.

It's something only affordable to either those with a lot of disposable income, or those who are planning to make a hefty profit from it (and won't be worrying about money in the meantime either).

Even in times when I was making the same income as a plumber, the idea of hiring one was deeply financially intimidating. Even an independent one. The way it's stacked, you can only afford to hire people in a lower class/caste/tax-bracket than yourself.

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

100% this. They couldn't afford each other before. Just because AI options are cheap and fast doesn't make them able to afford real work suddenly.

[-] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

Yep. And people want to work on something they're passionate about. So unless you're actively collaborating all through the creative process, it's mostly going to be one person's creative vision. You can say that the music video is a collaboration between the animator/effects artist and the musician, but if the musician has something specific in mind that they want to make, that's not going to feel like a collaboration for the video artist,it's going to feel like a commission. Which no one wants to do for free.

[-] imvii@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I do music and other art. I did use early AI to make a few music videos because I liked the jankyness of it all. How it was strange and surreal - like a dream. If anything, it was more of an experiment in a medium that wasn't ready.

I don't use any AI today except to mock it. I reject it as much as possible.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, there was a period there where it was super interesting to explore and learn about. As a technology, it still is! But as a corporate product, it's the essence of everything that's wrong with capitalism - no real value in most cases, manufactured needs, embrace-extend-extinguish, and no down about to hit the hard downslope on the enshittification curve too.

[-] Keilik@lemmy.world 134 points 5 days ago

Could it be a symptom of everybody being broke af and not wanting to ask someone to work for exposure? Because a lot of artists are lucky enough to make enough money to cover their expenses for doing the art, let alone anything else.

I would love to see more collaborations and rejection of AI for everything but the tasks that are actually a decent use case (preliminary searches and compiling massive pools of data) and I think one of the best way to start is to just pay people a living wage.

[-] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 52 points 5 days ago

With how bad AI art is, I kind of wish that artists would be ok letting their work stand on its own. Like does an album need a cover or an article graphics if it’s just the equivalent of visual static. It’s not really elevating the piece any, it’s just there to fill a void. Make it ok to have stand alone pieces again!

[-] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Yeah i mean ive seen some straight dogshit album covers for good music. Its not like the cover sells the thing anyways.

Royalty free music is pretty cheap to come by and coding isnt that difficult.

If you need a thing and cant pay for a thing, then learn to do the thing. A shit job is better than ai generated imho

[-] Dookieman12@piefed.social 16 points 4 days ago

coding isnt that difficult.

What programs have you written?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 28 points 4 days ago

The reality is that almost no self sustaining artists can afford each other's work. Instead artists are forced to charge prices other artists would consider their entire grocery bill. Instead they have to hope they can either get patronage from the wealthy or some sort of corporation.

[-] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 days ago

AI is churning out low quality products at a high rate. artists i see offer commissions around 20 bucks at a significantly higher quality than AI. while you won't get the mona lisa anywhere for 20 quid, it is about the same price as chat gpt go costs you per month.

usually you don't need the magnum opus of an artist for supporting art. you need good quality, which for an experience artist is achievable in reasonable time and money. support eachother!

[-] carotte 63 points 5 days ago

it’s interesting how many creatives and professionals see ai as being perfectly able to replace anyone’s work who isn’t theirs, but unable to replace them. i remember seeing a post about storyboarders thinking ai was unfit for storyboards, but good for concept art, and concept artists thinking ai was unfit for concept art, but fine for storyboards.

everyone sees the value in their work, but many can’t see the value of other people’s work, and think an ai-generated approximation that’s "good enough" is fine to replace it… it’s kinda sad, really

the exception is software developers, who are more than eager to replace their own work with ai-generated garbage. i don’t know why so many software devs have so little respect for themselves and their work, but i can’t say i’m surprised honestly.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago

Was going to post the same thing. It's not just the arts either, all branches of academia seem to be suffering from this.

i don’t know why so many software devs have so little respect for themselves and their work

A lot of the dev process is tedious as fuck. I've never met a developer who enjoys writing tests, for example. That plus Agile/kanban long since totally dehumanized the development process by treating devs as fungible engineering units.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nightlily@leminal.space 6 points 4 days ago

Nah there’s a lot of propaganda going around about LLMs and programmers. There’s some real die-hard advocates who think their own experiences project to the whole industry. It’s fucking awful at specialised domains with large proprietary codebases. Even if you get past needing a complete lack of moral backbone it just doesn’t make any sense to use in a lot of codebases - not that companies aren’t about to learn an expensive lesson about why.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Worstdriver@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Seen this myself.

I just semi-retired after 10 years of writing My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic fanfiction. It was a nice little side hustle that brought in 1-2k a year and I enjoyed learning how to write stories.

In the past I would write a story and then either commission an artist for some cover art, or find some that suited the story on one of the many MLP art databases and ask permission to use it. In 10 years of writing over a million words I was never once refused my request to use someone's art, and I always made sure the artist was credited.

But, in the past year or so the primary website for MLP fanfictions (fimfiction.net) started allowing AI art for covers which like the OP, I feel to be a betrayal of our fellow creatives. We definitely need to stand together against the tide of AI slop, no matter its genre.

[-] magic_smoke 3 points 3 days ago
[-] Worstdriver@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And yeah, I've contributed more than my share of clop, but if you are looking for good non-clop stories check out:

The Dresden Fillies series - Dresden Files crossover

White by Crimnar - short horror story

Changeling Space Program - a riff on the Kerbal Space Program game

Celestia vs Garble - pure comedy in Monty Python style

It Sleeps Beneath Foal Mountain - Lovecraftian horror

Parlous - some of the best uses of archaic words and phrases I've ever read.

None of these are by me. Just some of my favorites

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

Realistically a lot of the people who are using AI for these were previously just ripping them off the internet and hoping nobody would notice...

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

"I'm an artiste, machines shouldn't do what I do, those other folks have it easy." repeat for every group thinking of every other group.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The human brain always picks convenience.

We simply cannot help ourselves.

I’ve grown immensely cynical about that this past decade. Like, literally every chance we get to take a less destructive path, I observe people skip it because it’s slightly less convenient… that’s why they use AI.

They could give another artist $20 for something important, but our monkey brain is tired and picks the 5 second solution instead. I bet they don’t even look outside ChatGPT.

…So yeah, I think we’re in trouble. As this is not going to stop.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago

If I see an AI image for a song on spotify, there's a 90% the music is too.

[-] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 15 points 4 days ago

Artist spoiler : art is work and work needs pay. We don't have any money. Wanna see your favorite artists make human collabs? Pay them, back them or stfu.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bowsertattoo@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago

solidarity brother! im a visual artist, and i deleted spotify in solidarity with musicians. i download from bandcamp now.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

See also: People who HATE AI, but still use it to make/upscale their "memes." Was somewhat common in reddit the "this is the only good use of AI" crowd.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago

"It's only good when I use it."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 15 points 4 days ago

IIRC that "You wouldn't download a car!" piracy screen used it's music and font without a license.

It's selfishness, not any sort of consistent belief system. AI that undermines me is the worst thing ever, but I'll use AI that shits on other people without a second thought.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Stop it. Get some help.

Edit: image for clarity

Edit 2 for more clarity: Stop using generative AI and get help from artists and creatives.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] tenacious_mucus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I have an old buddy who’s a pretty accomplished tattoo artist, and as goes is also a pretty good artist in many other ways- pen/ink, paint, etc. We have a few of his hand drawn or painted pieces hanging on our walls.

I saw sometime last year that he was proudly telling everyone about his AI art shop on Etsy…selling art he was just having AI generated and printed via whatever those shops that just print whatever you want on whatever you want and drop shipped to you. …so sad…

[-] LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago

Dude have you ever tried to collaborate with anyone?

Also, A, no one has money.

And B: it turns out learning an art form to a high enough degree to use it to sell something involves (generally) doing it from a young age and each different skill requires other related skills. Nobody has the time to make music, and learn art, and then graphic art, and marketing, and writing, and accounting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Unfortunately I'm pessimistic it will ever happen. AI rewards you with what you want (or a mimic of it anyway) for not talking to people. Which feeds the largest insecurity all artists have, expressing themselves and connecting with others outside their art.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
1063 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7895 readers
569 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS