99
submitted 19 hours ago by zabadoh@ani.social to c/privacy@lemmy.ca
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago

Article doesn't load. Please don't link to the NY Times

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 21 points 12 hours ago

Bad Times. He didn't erase anything. The pigs erased it.

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 8 points 11 hours ago

Don’t visit the fascist USA

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 10 hours ago

Well, at least don't visit the fascist parts, which aren't all that nice anyway.

[-] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 47 points 19 hours ago

A citizen not under arrest? How is that destroying evidence?

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 30 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They destroyed their own private information that might prove them guilty of a crime during an unreasonable search and seizure, therefore they're guilty of a different crime.

No entrapment at all.

Oh, and it wasn't even the person, it was law enforcement that erased the person's phone through arguably careless handling.

/s in case it isn't obvious.

[-] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 19 points 16 hours ago

Hopefully it goes in front a judge who sees this as the harassment it clearly is. Thanks for posting

[-] Krusty@quokk.au 3 points 17 hours ago

Why do people talk this way?

It's weird. Passive aggressive. Psychological issues?

[-] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 2 points 15 hours ago

Out of curiosity, what is weird about it?

[-] XLE@piefed.social 15 points 16 hours ago

You're not alone with this assessment. And what's more interesting...

“Many times the government wants to highlight what it was trying to investigate because that ups the stakes on what the defendant was doing,” Professor Richman said. “This is a case where I think they’re trying to avoid exactly that by focusing only on the destruction, and not what the investigation was about.”

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 12 points 19 hours ago

I'd never heard of a "duress code" app, but it makes a lot of sense.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Its not an app, its a feature of GrapheneOS. The most secure mobile os, sadly it only supports Google pixels, but for good reason. Pixels are the only android phones with hardware features up to their security standards.

Highly recommend GrapheneOS, been running it for years, gets Google out of all your personal data as well.

[-] birdwing 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Not just Pixels, soon they'll also support Motorola.

One major thing withholding me from buying one is that I find it difficult to reconcile privacy with that company, considering it's US-based (and thus subject to the CLOUD Act) and Chinese-owned (thus making me wonder whether the Chinese government can affect it).

Currently, I trust China more than the US government, but neither is great. The EU is comparatively more reliable, and the Nordics even more.

[-] who@feddit.org 5 points 17 hours ago

they’ll also support Motorola.

Motorola (the company whose name and reputation has been well known for decades) no longer exists. Its successor is called Motorola Solutions, and it's not the company making the upcoming GrapheneOS phone. That device is coming from Motorola Mobility, which is a completely separate company, owned by China's Lenovo.

thus making me wonder whether the Chinese government can affect it

They absolutely can. And, since they have the means, the incentive, and no reason to fear repercussions, they probably will. The questions on my mind are how they will affect it, and who will find out.

I hope the hardware and firmware features used by GrapheneOS will become common some day. I think Sony's Xperia line comes close. Perhaps the GrapheneOS maintainers should talk with them next.

[-] birdwing 1 points 7 hours ago

Honestly, it'd be nice if Fairphone had better security. If that were the case I think there's not much of a question what to pick.

[-] Truscape 9 points 19 hours ago

It's a native function of grapheneOS, as a "second passcode".

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 5 points 19 hours ago
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

That site doesn't work either

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

Try Option 2, 3, or 4.

Only Option 2 works for me

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

privacy

10524 readers
155 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS