414

OpenAI has ChatGPT, Anthropic has Claude, Google has Gemini. But what does Amazon have?

Not a whole lot, it turns out. Unlike its competitors in the tech megacorp scene, Amazon’s standout AI model — organized under the name “Nova” — is about the farthest thing from a household name. And that’s not likely to change anytime soon, because the ecommerce giant is now gutting its in-house AI labs, Bloomberg reports.

Per the outlet, Amazon is scaling back the ambitions of most of its Nova AI models and reorganizing its AI development teams as part of an effort to narrow its focus on “highest priority” goals, after its power-hungry large language models turned out to be a bust.

Accordingly, the company has put most of its AI models on ice, Amazon insiders told Bloomberg. This includes its text-based Nova models, as well as video- and image-generating models, all of which have been placed in a state of “keep the lights on,” meaning they’re technically still supported, but only receive the bare minimum resources needed to sustain them.

Instead, labor and computing power are being diverted toward a singular “frontier-model effort” led by Pieter Abbeel, director of the Berkeley Robot Learning Lab whose robotics company Covariant was hoovered up by Amazon in 2024. At the time Abbeel joined the tech giant, Covariant’s founders were working on AI models for robots, which lines up pretty well with Amazon’s push to automate everything it possibly can.

News of the shift in Amazon’s strategic focus comes a week after it closed one of its key AI offices in San Francisco, an 80-person site specializing in research on artificial general intelligence, the supposed next-level of AI development where the tech obtains human-level intelligence and reasoning skills.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 111 points 2 weeks ago
[-] RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world 64 points 2 weeks ago

The moral of the story is to sell the shovels

[-] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

And when everybody is rushing to sell shovels, you gotta sell wood and iron.

[-] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

And when everyone is selling wood and iron, you burn the forest down.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

The shovel sellers (i.e. Nvidia) started lending money to the gold diggers to buy shovels.

[-] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 weeks ago

The boom will end and the bubble will burst. Hopefully at least one of those companies goes under. Hopes it’s Google and Meta.

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Oracle is the one that has "bet the farm" so to speak.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Also led by the biggest ahole of the three

[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

It's a shame Oracle's downfall couldn't have happened a decade ago. Ellison has branched out and bought up a bunch of media companies in recent years and is setting up his (somehow even worse) son as heir to his empire, so even if Oracle dies we're still stuck with the fuckers for the foreseeable future.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

He's been detested for decades now, I'm sure there's a cohort of greyhair tech workers that've been waiting a long time for his downfall. Hopefully he's leveraged so badly that when the bill comes due, he'll have to give that shit up and leave us alone.

[-] ragas@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

Google is printing so much stupid money that they can still (almost) pay the AI hype from their earnings. Google will (sadly in my opinion) not go under.

[-] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yea, they’ll most likely survive this, but I am hoping they get broken up for being monopolistic (it was a tragedy that Judge Mehta did follow through). Buts that’s a different topic. Or that they go the way of other giants like IBM and Microsoft. Not gone, but not what they once were. Though I do want Google and Meta gone or at least highly regulated, but that’s also another topic.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

They won't fail, but they will change eventually. Capitalism demands it.

Youtube ads are now unwatchable, they're trying to wedge people off adblockers but they'll end up leaving chrome.

Google AI search results cost a LOT more than their classic search results. That's not a gain in profit.

Everything they're doing is WAY more expensive and it's just in the name of trying to prove to investors that they're in a growth market. AI will stop being allowed to be considered a growth market.

If Youtube isn't growing, and Gmail isn't growing and Search isn't growing, their valuation will plummet.

All of a sudden you'll see a LOT of firings and a LOT of cost reduction in places that don't make money.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

Neither of those are likely. OpenAI, Anthropic, and Oracle are all likely to go under, to then be bought out. Facebook will take a hit in stock price (maybe) but they have profitable divisions and Zucc structured the stock so he can’t be voted out. Amazon, Google, and Microsoft will likely see some executive shakeups, possibly to the point of the CEOs being ousted, but they all also have profitable business lines so the survival of the companies themselves is not really at risk.

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's gonna be OpenAI and Oracle. Google and Meta (and Microslop) are too diversified to go down, even if they will take massive hits.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Guarantee that Meta goes under. The only profitable ideas they've implemented were either stolen (Facebook) or bought from someone else (Instagram). Meanwhile Zuck loses hundreds of millions of dollars on dumb shit like the Metaverse

[-] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

The shovel industry is booming!!!

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago

Step 1: Spend tons of money on AI Step 2: Fire 10-20% of total tech workforce Step 3: ? Step 4: Profit (post positive earnings) Step 5: Fire even more employees because your AI solution is failing anyway

[-] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Amazon both fired a ton and had a ton of senior people leave, they burned the candle from both ends directly and indirectly and the effects are starting to amplify.

[-] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 1 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't they also obliterate their free cash flow?

[-] rockSlayer 35 points 2 weeks ago

lol

Lmao, even

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

WAIT, you mean not every single LLM company is going to win the LLM race? That in the end it'll be somewhere between 0 and 3 companies who make big money with a handful of niche players? Who would have thought?

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Amazon is playing the medium game.

Pivoting to build up its drone amd space force before attacking.

[-] babysmokesalot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

yet we pay for their failures via our tax dollars... Billionares are the welfare queens.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How are our tax dollars going to Netflix?

Edit: oh, it's about Amazon

[-] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Kind of funny in a way.

The ultra wealthy hate normal people that don't have a mental illness regarding hoarding. They sabotage education so that the populace is stupid and votes for them. Then, they create AI with the hopes of learning from the stupid populace, and it fails because the AI is synthesizing stupidity.

Maybe the stupid MAGAs will be their own downfall

[-] Thorry@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago

What is the point of creating a new frontier model? Even if you create something that is actually better than the rest (which is hard), it probably won't be that much better people are going to switch by themselves. Which means you need to heavily discount the price in order to get people to use it at all. This means not only do you need to front the investment to develop the model, and of course all of the marketing costs, but then also running at a loss for at least the first while. And let's say somehow people go along with you increasing prices once you get people on the platform (which is a big ask) to the point you get a modest profit, the amount of upfront investment would take years and years to make back.

Meanwhile everyone and their uncle is also working on their new frontier model and will be very tempting for your customers to switch to. Especially once you start increasing prices to get profitable. Users have shown very little to no brand loyalty and just use whatever. There's so many options available and all offer about the same in terms of UI and functionality.

Google is combining their AI stuff with their products, which is good for adoption, but people aren't willing to pay much for that. Microsoft was really well positioned to bundle it with their stuff, but somehow not only got in hot water with governments over them forcing users to use their AI stuff, but also didn't get users to use or pay for their AI stuff at all. The same story for others, getting adoption only works with very low prices or even free stuff. Even then it's hard and people switch quickly once prices go up. Companies are now also much more aware of the price of these things and the lack of ROI, so I would expect spending to go down in the future.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 weeks ago

There isn't much of a point in creating a frontier model, which is why you're seeing a lot of Silicon Valley pivot if they can.

Google seemed to be comfortable in not being at the bleeding edge, just far enough not to topple its search engine. I wouldn't be surprised if Google's AI is cheaper to run than other models.

Meta doesn't have anything other than social media and can't seem to make the next big thing.

Microsoft is getting railed because of the collapse in gaming and a major market going towards digital sovereignty. It also doesn't help that its rollout of Windows 11 was so bad there is now a Linux consumer threat. The problem is that there isn't anything else for them to sell except AI.

[-] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's clearly a case of winner take all and recently, the open weight model will be 80% as good for free and you can run it on open cloud services for 20% of the cost. The top ai companies will only be able to continue with market share dominance if they have cheap subsidized and unprofitable monthly plans, and their goal of having billions of dollars in profitable but incredibly expensive enterprise token use will be undercut by those free Chinese models. People using free model most of the time with the expensive paid model only used selectively for reviews isn't enough money for the ai companies to win.

But this only applies to the next 5 or 6 years, after that if Nvidia can keep going with big improvements then you can get a 100 to 1000x reduction in cost per token that will change that, but it's hard to see farther out.

[-] LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Frontier model? The most recent one was so good the government had to step in. An AGI can never really happen because of situations like that. Add to that the rogue Ai attack that happened, and the future for these things seems to be quite limited. In a regular regulatory framework this whole field would have been legislated and limited enough that that we wouldn't have Ai escaping, and wouldn't have people being able to use it nefaurously. This is why there won't be a "frontier model." Because these failures will happen, databases will get dumped accidentally, all that. Because there are no guardrails, there's no point in innovating.

[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Oh noooooo

Anyway

[-] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Amazon has had a huge brain drain going on for the past several years now. They’ve lost a huge portion of senior engineers to competitors and replaced them with people too junior to step into the hole that was left. Amazon is faltering.

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I feel for the developers who will inevitably lose their jobs. Otherwise, HA HA!

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'm actually a bit disappointed that Amazon isn't going to crash and burn like all these other companies when the bubble bursts :(

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Don't worry, they still have ways to suffer:

During the call, Jassy told investors that Amazon now expects to spend $220 billion in capital expenditures in 2026, up from its prior estimate of $200 billion, due to higher memory costs. Even at the elevated level, however, Jassy said Amazon still won’t “have enough capacity to meet all the demand we have in 2026. And I believe this dynamic will also be true in 2027 too.”

They go into debt to build the compute infrastructure for others. And then that won't deliver any significant amount of rent, once OpenAi and Anthropic run out of money.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Many LLM labs are shockingly dysfunctional.

Amazon and the useless Nova series is a great example, but Microsoft has its own too. AMD as well.

Europe has a ton of them, labs barely replicating obsolete Llama2 training routines in 2026, but somehow getting tons of taxpayer dollars? Saudi labs doing basically nothing.

I mean… I could follow an off-the-shelf Nvidia Nemotron recipe and do better. Or more sanely, just start with that as a base. And that’s sad; apparently these highly paid labs don’t even follow the space enough to know to do that? What on Earth are they even doing internally?

[-] searabbit@piefed.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Have you seen how these tech companies treat their workers? Too many in the field are extremely burnt out to point that they can't function anywhere near the level required for the technological breakthroughs that the execs are demanding. They want to hire entry to mid-level data scientists for the low pay and then expect them to output the quality of work of a senior data scientist with 10+ years of experience. They're being set up to fail.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That’s not even “breakthroughs,” though.

That’s just “follow instructions for what’s already been done, and meet par.” Anyone with some Python experience and instruction following ability could do it. In LLM land, what some research houses are doing would be like releasing some new white box computer with chips from 15 years ago.

It makes no sense. It’s way too late to be interesting.

But I guess it’s getting funded because the funders can’t really tell.

[-] dregan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As competition starts dropping dead, we are rapidly approaching the part where the companies who have been weaponizing debt start charging whatever people will pay. The golden days of AI will soon be over. If it makes your devs 10x more efficient, be ready to be charged the price of 5-7 devs.

[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I really need the AI bubble to wait two months to pop so that I can get my buy-a-house seed money out of the market.

[-] LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

Umm, bud, get that money out now? It's commonly advised to not bet anything you need, or use it as a savings account. Especially not now, before it was barely somewhat possible when things were stable, but not now. And with your down payment? Pretty serious stuff to lose just because some jabroni sends a tweet or didn't bribe the administration enough. Things can go right, yeah, but think about how wrong things can go, and how fast, and how much more likely that is than making... What? 1k or something, at most? Naah, naah. You can just negotiate a better price for the house to make up for the difference.

[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Umm, bud, get that money out now?

Can’t. It’s a company stock plan where you can choose to buy it and have payroll deductions over a year, and at the end if the price has stayed steady or increased they give it to you at 20% under the price it was a year earlier. Since my company stock is 4x what it was a year ago that became some real money, but I think it may be tied to the bubble so I’m hoping for an october pop.

[-] Vetis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

That person is right, but I think you'll be fine. It's only gonna crash hard after AI companies finish their IPOs and get some nice bag holders. Until then they'll do anything to prevent it. Doesn't mean they'll succeed though !

[-] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

Insert sickos.jpg here :)

[-] Atlas48@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

Good news

I don't blame a company for investing a bit of time in trying out a new tech, but it's good they realized it's trash before it was too late.

It's like an energy company that hired climate scientists, and then decided to stop drilling for hydrocarbons and instead shifted to offshore wind

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
414 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7957 readers
1788 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS