583
But who's counting? (img-9gag-fun.9cache.com)
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] disorderly@lemmy.world 79 points 3 days ago

This is also ripe for a "so far" meme given the enormous number of omissions and redactions.

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

We were ALLOWED to see 38,000 entries. JFC.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

The "files" from the "Trump/Epstein" files are mostly MP4 files yet they throw written documents out there as if it is 1950. Don't fool yourself for a second, they videotaped most of that crap that was going on.

[-] saimen@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago
[-] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

Epstein himself said he videotaped everything. Now why would a narcissist take orders from the leader of another country? What kind of absolute leverage would cause that? Tapes. Of unspeakable horrors.

[-] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

the amount of data indicates this. there would not big amounts of data if it were just emails and messages.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I cite bloody common sense as my most trusted source.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't know about mostly that have been released, but maybe that haven't been released? I wouldn't put it past them. https://epsteinexposed.com/evidence

[-] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

Are there really less than 38,000 visible stars?

I've been out in the open ocean hundreds of miles from land, lights out, looking at the whole of the milky way on a clear night. Just from my one hemisphere view it seemed like 10's of thousands....

[-] badmancrooks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Unassisted, to the naked eye.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 34 points 3 days ago

11,000 bird species. 38,000 mentions.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I like that every single mention of Obama is one of the pedos cursing his name.

[-] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

Didn't realize Obama's name was so sick, poor thing.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Yes, yes, yes, but what about Fauci pleading the fifth about Covid huh liberals?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don't get why he pled the fifth.

It's not like they kicked his lawyer out of the building while trying to manipulate him into saying something they could stretch into justifications to prosecute him, right?

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

In the words of a "totally-not-Republican" person I know (who identifies as "far-right"):

"I'm not saying I would have the man over for dinner."

Obviously I was taken aback and have yet to come up with a response that I believe they would find convincing in demonstrating Trump should not be in the White House, even years later.

[-] BiggestPiggest@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago
[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Generally, fewer is used when a number of things can be counted ("fewer problems") and less is used when an amount is measured ("less trouble" or "less time"). However, this is not a strict rule and there are accepted instances of less being used with countable amounts such as "250 words or less," "3 items or less," and especially with money ("less than $20") and distance ("less than 3 miles"). Note that in all these cases, the things considered are often thought of as amounts rather than numbers.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/fewer-vs-less

"38,000 mentions", so "less" is appropriate.

[-] Prathas@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Well, they should be "fewer."

[-] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It is absolutely a strict rule and Merriam Webster can fuck right off.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

An entire Wikipedia page exists on this due to the evolution of use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fewer_versus_less

Even Tesco avoided using "fewer" to keep from getting stuck in this debate.

The rule may have been codified in the 1700s, but plenty of linguistic shifts have occurred since then.

[-] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I thought it was, one less and two fewer.

[-] underscore_@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Also “fewer times/occurrences” vs “less often/frequently”

[-] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 days ago

Ok but there’s only one species of bird and that’s “bird” dumbass

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Well, Jesus' name only appears in the new testament, which is less than half the Bible

[-] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah but youll note that people tend to say the Bible is about jesus, or that hes the main character

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well technically Jesus is God. But the name God appears way more often in the Bible than Jesus. The only book in the Bible that doesn't directly mention him is Esther

[-] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Is that the number of stars over the course of a year or at any given time

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

From the article linked by MML:

You might be in for a surprise when you read it, though. To answer the question, "How many stars in the sky?" The total comes to 9,096 stars visible across the entire sky. Both hemispheres. Since we can only see half the celestial sphere at any moment, we necessarily divide that number by two to arrive at 4,548 stars (give or take depending on the season). And that's from the darkest sky you can imagine. I don't know about you, but that number seems paltry to one's impression of an inky night in the backcountry.

At the poles, where the north and south polestars are pinned to the zenith and no stars rise or set, the same ~4,500 stars are visible every single clear night of the year. At northern mid-latitudes, the pole star is halfway up in the northern sky, allowing us to peer deeper into the southern realms of the celestial sphere. During the course of a year from latitude 45° north, we see roughly half again as many stars as we do at a particular time on a given evening. That tallies up to approximately 6,800 stars. Still pretty lean, but apparently enough to convey the impression of an intensely starry sky.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
583 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

2533 readers
486 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS