Of course she does, Democrats are trash.
The level of political rot in this country is at comical levels, as we can see from this race.
There is NOTHING Stevens is better on than Abdul. NOTHING. I cannot believe this horseshit
She's better at taking AIPAC money
She's better at grifting with an AI datacenter building husband. Abdul can't claim that
It really is sad though that 99% of politicians here have completely sold us out. We’re on our own. Nobody is coming to save us
This kind of doomerism is an AIPAC/GOP/Big Tech talking point designed to discourage voting and you might want to consider not spreading it
If the choices for voting is red fascist or blue fascist there is no point
Again mass oversimplification for the sake of selling said viewpoint. There is also Abdul El Sayed on the ballot. A Democratic socialist yet you word it in a way that there's only two options. Sounds like either a foreign shill or not with an obvious agenda.
Its not oversimplification, the only ones that spew the 'discourage voting' bullshit are the VBNMW liberals that wouldnt vote for someone like El Sayed to begin with. In their worldview there are only 2 options, the red fascist or the blue fascist, who they dont see as fascist.
'If the choices for voting is red fascist or blue fascist there is no point.'
A simple repaste of your original comment to show the obvious oversimplification meant to discourage voting
Yeah. Whitmer, who sold us out at the eleventh hour, in favor of data centers. Knowing she's term limited so she can do whatever the hell she wants. Daughter of a health insurance CEO. A huge benefactor of DTE bribes. Hugged Trump and kissed the ring for a couple of jets.
I'm gonna not vote for Haley Stevens even harder.
Didn’t Whitmer just get caught on a hot mic telling a billionaire that she’s “used to” ignoring the will of the voters? Fuck her. At least Republicans are honest about their contempt for us. Democrats lie to your face.
Not that I've seen evidence of. There was an article posted from some right-leaning hack website that's said as much in a title but when you read the article the quote they had could've been interpreted a bunch of ways and the most natural reading of it didn't imply that at all. So until I see any evidence, that story is bullshit.
Whitmer has done a lot of good for the state, but is imperfect, and it doesn't really matter to me who she endorses because I'm supporting progressives in the primaries. I miss having politicians with bold, uplifting visions for the future I don't care if "they can't ever get that done." Give me a thousand dreamers who can't get it done over anyone who acts like it's the oligarch's world and we can only turn up the A/C on our slow descent into hell. And who knows — they just might lay the foundation to attain those dreams.
Mamdani shows that it can be done.
Jfc the Republicans are doing so much more shit than they admit to. Imagine what they could be doing that makes what they say out loud ok to them.
Not defending whitmer but saying the GOP is better because they admit to some heinous shit is nonsense.
In a way it kind of is, I’d rather someone be an open and honest fascist than a closet fascist/fascist collaborator. Easy to read intentions and I know to expect absolutely nothing from you but pain.
Anyone down voting you has never read Malcolm X's The Ballot or the bullet.
So I just looked up Haley and that picture gives me serious demon vibes, and she's a centrist democrat that supports Schumer so that's CONFIRMED.
Wow. You didn't have to attack demons that hard.
Mar-a-lago face
It’s a little encouraging that ghouls with presidential aspirations like Whitmer and Newsom are letting the mask slip in such obvious ways.
of course she does
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News