451
submitted 6 days ago by velma@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

As she walked the aisles, MR said in an interview, she sensed a man standing close behind her. She turned to confront him and noticed that he was a good six inches taller than her. He was talking in graphic detail about sexual things he wanted to do to her. “You’re so disgusting, get away from me,” she told him, and hurried off to find her friend.

Still, he stayed close, and for a few tense minutes the two of them locked eyes while she waited in line to pay. When at last he left, she thought that was the end of it – until, back outside in the chill of the winter morning, she felt something cold against the back of her leggings.

The man had ejaculated on her.

“I didn’t know how to react. I wanted to kill this man,” said MR, who was 47 at the time, recalling the horror and helplessness she felt as her friend wiped her off with towels. (The Guardian has verified MR’s identity but is not publishing her full name to protect her privacy.)

Hours later, on the advice of a sister who worked in law enforcement, she fished her soiled leggings out of the garbage and took them back to the store to report what had happened. A clerk listened to her account and, not seeming to realize that MR understood Spanish, shouted to a colleague in a backroom: “Tenemos otra.”

“We’ve got another one.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aramis87@fedia.io 227 points 6 days ago

This should end up with them on the sex offender registry. It won't, but it should.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 99 points 6 days ago

I mean what else would it be if not sexual assault tantamount to rape?

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 77 points 6 days ago

Under Texas law, it's indecent assault, a misdemeanor for a first offense in most cases. It's similar in Pennsylvania. Those are two of the states where incidents in the article took place.

I'm generally against the recent trend to increase the severity of existing crimes, but I will make an exception here: this should be a felony.

[-] pressedhams 45 points 6 days ago

Rape has a legal definition that this does not meet.

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 78 points 6 days ago

It's sexual assault.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Polyphilic@lemmy.ca 46 points 5 days ago

You know what else would be funny? Convictions. Fuck these losers

Fucking gross. What the fuck is wrong with men these days? And I'm saying this as a man. Fucking hell.

They're really becoming a race of fucking baboons. Between the looksmaxxing incels, the christo-fascists, misogynists, and these sexual predators, there's just no end to the shit men are doing these days. You can't rely on them to save our society from the predators that rule it, because they're on the same fucking team.

I swear, if I have faith in anyone to save our society it's going to be women and queer folk. Because the men have lost it.

[-] rethnor@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago

As bad as it is today, I'm assuming it's still better than most of history. It's not a woman's duty to service her husband anymore, he can still get charged with rape even when married.

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 days ago

What a low fucking bar that is..

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

"Don't worry, ladies! Your husband can now maybe get arrested when he rapes you! Equality!"

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 91 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Let this shit happen in front of me. There is no way I'm not interfering. I don't mind going to jail for beating the brakes off of a bully.

[-] Blibly@lemmy.world 88 points 6 days ago

Our society has broken down to the point that we legitimately have to bring back mob justice. I'm so ashamed to be a human right now.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 6 days ago

Has it broken down, or is the basic level of degeneracy just amplified?

I think a lot of people lose sight of the fact that society is still at the most advanced level it has ever been, violent crimes have dropped steadily across most of the world. But now when isolated incidents like the above happen, the internet amplifies them into being a bigger deal than it really is on a population scale.

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's a pretty big fucking deal for men to be encouraged and celebrated for publicly ejaculating on women.

[-] SnotFlickerman 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

But now when isolated incidents like the above happen, the internet amplifies them into being a bigger deal than it really is on a population scale.

You sound like this guy:

There's always room for improvement. Like I thought that was the entire basis of Critical Theory is that there is no end to history, there is no perfect society, we can always improve, and improvement must come through rational and thoughtful critique of the status quo, whatever the status quo may be, forever and ever. Marx's society in perpetual revolution within itself.

Sure crime may never be zero, but acting like the solution is to just throw up your hands and say "what's the big deal if some women are mentally scarred, it's only a few of them! The world is doing better than it ever has, the arc of history bends towards justice! (editors note: barf) Why would we make the world better just for them?"

The answer to that question is because they are a part of that world too. Also, these are not the only crimes enabled by how the Dollar empire operates.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

Watch out, we've got a badass over here

But really, I hope you would fuck them up

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Shame on The Guardian for using a term for a kink when the article itself even mentions a term for the specific form of sexual assault. Why call this anything ralted to gooning when it's tagging/sharking/cum-sharking?

This may seem minor to folks, but it's actually extremely concerning. I'll be very clear though, this behavior was disgusting. I'm not saying people engaging in sexual assault aren't pieces of shit or that they're just engaging in a harmless kink. The problem is that the article also uses a term for a kink/people engaging in a kink and labels it onto people engaging in sexual assault.

It even came with its own specialized vocabulary. Masturbating in public and surreptitiously ejaculating on random women was known as “tagging” or “sharking” – or even “cum-sharking”. Online forums praised perpetrators for being “low inhibition” or “low inhib”, and users contributing to the discussion said they wished they could summon the same fearlessness in themselves.

[...]

Almost immediately, the lawyers stumbled on another weird dimension to the cases they were developing: an online subculture of lonely, disaffected men, known as “gooners”, who bond with one other over their shared fascination with obsessive masturbation and compete with each other to see who can keep going for hours or even days at a time.

While most appear to pursue their self-pleasure in private “goon caves” and are not criminals, some gooners, the lawyers found, took pride in public acts of masturbation. In fact, some were committing sharking assaults at Dollar Tree stores and posting the footage online.

[...]

Another gooner, who was caught filming himself while masturbating at a Dollar Tree in Fern Park, Florida, told police that he did this regularly “in different locations” and uploaded the videos to an OnlyFans page, according to his arrest report.

[...]

Long before it developed an association with criminal acts, “gooning” was understood as a pornography-fueled compulsion, sometimes involving multiple screens at once, that can become a substitute for intimate relationships with others. It also tends to come with a heavy dose of self-loathing. Experts say that online forums and video content aimed at gooners often send the message that obsessive masturbation – whether alone or in public – is as much as men like them can aspire to in life. Webster described it as a “disavowed manic state of triumph over something hideous”.

One common trope of the pornography that these gooners consume has men ejaculating over women’s bodies, faces and hair – acts that, Lankford said, have no basis in evolutionary biology and are difficult to interpret as anything other than demeaning to the women.


As a small aside, I think the last paragraph really shows out weirdly out of touch some of this article is. Does something sexual have to be based on "evolutionary psychology" for it to be considered acceptable? As long as consensual for all parties involved, why does it matter? Just because something makes you personally uncomfortable doesn't mean it's something that's inherently wrong. Kinks can be explored in a consensusal, safe, and healthy way. Conversely, would that suddenly mean other niche kinks that are based in more biological topics are considered acceptable? Does knotting get a pass but facials don't?? Like, this paragraph is just so weird. Anyways, back to the main point.

This is really concerning to me. It's the Overton window shifting to demonize porn instead of the actual issue at hand: sexual assault.

For folks who might not understand why I think this is concerning, consider this hypothetical alternative scenario.

Alcoholic sexually assaults woman

A local woman was attacked in public. During the assault, the assailant's words were slurred and his breath smelled of hard liquor. He was detained and found to be a part of a community that attacks women and posts videos of it online. They call themselves rapists.

Almost immediately, the lawyers stumbled on another weird dimension to the cases they were developing: a disturbing trend amongst people to engage in drinking alcohol. These alcoholics bond with others over their shared interest in alcohol.

While most alcoholics are content to self indulge at home or in bars, many also drink at parties, or large get togethers of many people. At these parties many people drink alcohol. A concerning trend amongst party goers is to have sex. Many of these alcoholics rape women at these parties.

We consulted a biologist and they informed us that alcohol is actually poisonous to the body and there is no reason one should ever consume it.

In case it's not clear, instead of calling the person a rapist they're called an alcoholic, ignores that the person is in a group called "rapists", and then tries to make a connection between alcohol and rape.

What if the article was about finding a kidnapping victim who was tied up and the article attributed it to shibari? It's just so weird to me. I find it disgusting. I hope that others here aren't so puritanical that they can see the problem I'm illustrating.

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 days ago

I'll do plenty of things that have no basis in evolutionary biology. I just get consent first.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 57 points 6 days ago

Not even sorry to say, the INSTANT I feel threatened, my tiny ass foot is going up your dick hole as forcibly as possible. I am fairly small, don't often feel worried about that... but you get in my space I'm going to bring you down to my height. Or the floor. Preferably the floor.

Disgusting people need to be afraid of reactions again.

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

This is how perverts and men who try to intimidate women should be treated by everyone. Perverts, and billionaires.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago

Need to bring back hat pins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Areldyb@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

Sometimes I feel like we'd have a better world if we gave women free guns.

Not a kinder world, probably, but a better one.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 45 points 6 days ago

A “Dollar Tree gooner” crypto coin launched in January 2025, followed by an unofficial Pokémon card and a song released on SoundCloud by an underground noise band from Tennessee named Mukus.

Everything for the memes. Nothing else matters.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Those responsible for the act here are horrible, broken people, but don't forget the company that created the conditions for this to happen and an environment where their employees can be so casual about sexual assault - most likely being perpetrated predominately on low/no income individuals and people of color per Dollar Tree's typical customer base.

[-] Lumelore 39 points 6 days ago

I had something like this happen to me when I was 20. I was helping my disabled aunt by bringing some boxes up to her apartment. I kept seeing this one really old guy as I was going up and down and I got really off vibes from him. As I was leaving the building, I grabbed the same doorhandle I had grabbed many times before, except this time there was semen on the backside of it and it got all over my hand. I'm pretty sure it was the old guy cause I never saw anyone else except my aunt there. I was too naïve to know what to do in that situation so unfortunately he got away with it :(

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 days ago

I'm sorry you experienced that.

[-] Angular@crazypeople.online 31 points 6 days ago

I will, for sure, kill a mfer for doing that to me or my wife.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago

My objection to capital punishment leaving my body

[-] FunStuffIsFun@eviltoast.org 12 points 5 days ago

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

[-] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 26 points 6 days ago

This is repulsive. As a (wo?)man, I’d beat the fucking shit out of anyone who does this.

[-] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The issues is most women can’t beat the shit out of most men and the men doing this know it and don’t care about anything except physical domination. That said, a good knee or kick to the groin will do the trick, no ass beating required.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We have idiots out here everyday tryna catch pedophiles ("the call is coming from inside the house!") but nobody steps up to try to catch and break motherfuckers like this.

It absolutely makes me want to start a Dollar Watch where we basically wait around outside of dollar stores and wait for this kind of incident to happen so there's someone there to tackle these chumps as they try to get away.

Unfortunately, for types like this, the only meaningful thing that ever works is consequences to their actions... and often that's not enough either.

EDIT: Also decent men should be infiltrating these groups and tipping off the fucking cops... and noting when the people they are rooting out are cops themselves! to ensure they're not handing the case over to people who will bury it.

[-] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

How... How do you even do that????? Dumbfounded.

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 24 points 6 days ago

Ew. Those stores have really narrow aisles and idk if its like this everywhere, but they're often kinda messy -- like its not uncommon for things to get knocked down to the floor. And the aisles are not easily observed from the checkout. Oh look, another public space that is not safe for everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FE80@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

The future is fuckin weird.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spacegoat@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Giving gooners everywhere a bad name

[-] velma@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago

People really seem to be taking offense to the reputation of gooners taking a hit with this piece.

If you're a gooner and NOT assaulting women in public, you're probably fine and this article isn't talking about you.

[-] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago

Someone that goons is engaging a form of extended masturbation without climax. That is not sexual assault. What people are worried about is that gooning will be equated with sexual assault, because they are not the same thing. Not all gooners are rapists, and not all rapists are gooners. Furthermore, if a person wants to goon, they shouldn't have to worry about their reputation over it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
451 points (100.0% liked)

News

38498 readers
931 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS