59
submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

At least it'll be super duper clean coal. Right?

[-] stumu415@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago
[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 3 days ago

And it looks similar with other countries. This is just so dumb wrt the USA.

[-] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

Is there even enough of an international market for coal right now for there to be an appreciable number of buyers for the coal? Coal mines shut down in the first place because people weren't using coal. I know a few places have brought some coal back into play due to Strait-of-Hormuz-related issues, but is it enough to fuel demand, especially from countries who have ample reason to be Not Happy with the US right now and may have other available sources of coal?

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Think it's mostly undeveloped countries and Germany that use it for power generation

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

You mean underdeveloped countries like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia and the US? All of them produce much more power using coal then Germany....

The big one is China and then with a massive gap India.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

No idea, but the US actively exports a fair bit of coal

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

The US mined 410Mt of coal last year, which is obviously not all exported. There are a few countries, which buy coal in meaningful amounts, that such a terminal could make sense.

However the largest potential importer is China and that is falling.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

falling yes, but even “falling” it currently uses nearly 4x the coal that the USA was using during its peak use.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Currently China makes up more then half of global consumption. So if they have a fast decline, that can completely destroy the global coal market.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, but that’s unlikely in the short term.

The American coal industry being able to ship to foreign consumers is what is keeping it afloat, is my point.

The USA uses more renewables than coal now. There have been two Trump upticks but otherwise we’re well on the way to phasing it out.

The Chinese market is still robust, if they cut 3/4 of their use out they’d still have a larger consumption than the American market at its peak, hence why the USA enjoys their use.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

The total coal exports of the US are like 2% of Chinas coal consumption and the volume of US coal mining is about 10% of what China consumes. It really does not take much to kill that market.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Idk if you’re just wildly misinterpreting what I am saying or ???

The foreign coal markets are what is keeping the American coal industry afloat. That’s what I am saying.

The USA is largely phasing coal out, Trump and co are trying to stop this because they’re stupid.

The coal industry in the USA is dead without foreign purchasers.m, of which China is one.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Exactly, which is why China is so important. If they even have a fairly small drop in coal consumption, that basically kills US coal exports and therefore the US coal industry.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Much like the cigarette market, dominated by American tobacco producers, looks to the rest of the world.

You've caught up with my statement.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Sorry, it just took me a minute to understand that you truly believe that China rather import coal from the US, then protect its own mining industry.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

It's only a matter of time until people get upset enough from extreme weather...

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

They'll just keep blaming it on the queers.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

yeah I meant something else with my original comment...

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Sure, but I know what's gonna actually happen.

[-] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago

I think we actually have to wait for old people to die.

My dad saw a presentation once, which was enough to convince him that global warming isn't real. Or rather that the earth warms and cools naturally (true) so humans have nothing to do with it (not true).

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If anyone ever asks:

It's not the absolute global temperature that's the problem, it's the rate of change.

Here's the last 800 thousand years. That massive spike at the end is the problem. It's had much more CO2/heat in the past, but it's the rate of change that's the problem. Here's the last 70 million years, and it has been higher a long time ago but earth naturally changes pretty slowly at a few different cyclical periods, or over even longer periods of time.

If it increased naturally up to 430 ppm over time (like hundreds of thousands or millions of years), then life would have time to adapt. But it has shot up in less than 150 years and life just can't evolve or adapt that quickly.

edit: oh I didn't realize I'm in the Climate community, so people here probably know the above. This is meant for more general communities who may have heard about Fossil Capital's propaganda but don't actually know themselves what's true.

[-] alanjaow@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'm not a member of this community, but it did show up on my "home feed". While I knew the gist of your comment, it's good to have a refresher, plus anyone that doesn't know would be well served by reading it. Thank you for posting it :)

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The market for coal is dying, so the oligarch parasites are giving money to the high price whore to try and rake in the dough while they can.

Drumpft will do anything for money.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8693 readers
169 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS