59
submitted 4 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

The US mined 410Mt of coal last year, which is obviously not all exported. There are a few countries, which buy coal in meaningful amounts, that such a terminal could make sense.

However the largest potential importer is China and that is falling.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

falling yes, but even “falling” it currently uses nearly 4x the coal that the USA was using during its peak use.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Currently China makes up more then half of global consumption. So if they have a fast decline, that can completely destroy the global coal market.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, but that’s unlikely in the short term.

The American coal industry being able to ship to foreign consumers is what is keeping it afloat, is my point.

The USA uses more renewables than coal now. There have been two Trump upticks but otherwise we’re well on the way to phasing it out.

The Chinese market is still robust, if they cut 3/4 of their use out they’d still have a larger consumption than the American market at its peak, hence why the USA enjoys their use.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

The total coal exports of the US are like 2% of Chinas coal consumption and the volume of US coal mining is about 10% of what China consumes. It really does not take much to kill that market.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Idk if you’re just wildly misinterpreting what I am saying or ???

The foreign coal markets are what is keeping the American coal industry afloat. That’s what I am saying.

The USA is largely phasing coal out, Trump and co are trying to stop this because they’re stupid.

The coal industry in the USA is dead without foreign purchasers.m, of which China is one.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Exactly, which is why China is so important. If they even have a fairly small drop in coal consumption, that basically kills US coal exports and therefore the US coal industry.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Much like the cigarette market, dominated by American tobacco producers, looks to the rest of the world.

You've caught up with my statement.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Sorry, it just took me a minute to understand that you truly believe that China rather import coal from the US, then protect its own mining industry.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8693 readers
191 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS