78

I’m using Fusion360, and I dislike it for a lot of reasons, but it’s easy to use. I tried FreeCAD, but it was very janky in comparison. Shapr3D was surprisingly good, but there’s no way I’m paying monthly for my hobby usage. I need precision prints, so I can’t just use Blender or similar.

Is there some magical unicorn software I’m not finding?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bw42@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I use Microsoft 3D Builder for most of my modeling stuff. Mainly for things like hardware type stuff. Or simple modifications to existing models if I need.

It has a simple interface, really easy to use. Builds models from simple shapes, no needing to learn a programming language or weird clunky interfaces.

[-] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 29 points 1 week ago

I use FreeCAD.

I follow Mango Jelly Solutions and DeltaHedra on YouTube for tutorials.

I've had excellent results designing items for 3D prints.

[-] neclimdul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Mango's videos are great. I'd wager there are gems in there for even experienced users of freecad. I'm often surprised by some of the tricks he has.

[-] Bluewing@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

There are gems. I sometimes need to do things I don't often do in FreeCAD. A quick refresher from Mango, and I'm back in the groove.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 29 points 1 week ago

FreeCAD. It's janky, absolutely, but it's quite powerful once you get used to it. Improved a lot with the latest major update as well.

I also tried OpenSCAD for a bit. As someone with a programming background, I really like the principle of how it works. But ultimately, I found it way too limiting.

[-] meowmeow@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago

I used OpenSCAD for a bit, and it’s good for simple things where clicking is far less efficient. I once needed a plate with a set of holes. OpenSCAD was great.

[-] neclimdul@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I absolutely love freecad. There are dozens of us that actually really like it

[-] klangcola@reddthat.com 18 points 1 week ago

FreeCAD, and I recommend you give it a second try, while watching the excellent tutorials from Deltahedra and Mangojelly on YouTube. Lots of the jank can be avoided if you only know how, so the tutorials are extremely useful.

FreeCAD has gotten exponentially better with each release the last few years, and both active developers and funding/donations from users have increased exponentially. The future is bright. And unlike the "free" commercial programs, FreeCAD is immune to future rug-pulls and enshitification.

You might also want to try https://dune3d.org/ , a relatively new 3D CAD software

[-] ReCursing@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago

I'm using OpenSCAD because I want to program a fish!

[-] SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

+1 for OpenSCAD! If you have experience with scripting/coding, it feels really comfy. There’s a nice wikibook that taught me the basics.

The full release hasn’t been updated since 2021, so I highly recommend running a development snapshot. The preview and rendering are much more performant. Enable the “manifold” engine if it’s not on by default.


It works fine OOTB, but I customized it a bit to match my workflow: I use vim with an LSP as the text editor, and I use git to track my changes.

Now I’ve began using bosl2 in most of my projects. It has a lot of QOL features and can save a lot of work.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've been thinking about this a lot lately.

Over time, I've come to hate doing things in the "productivity-via-point-and-click-adventure" model. I very much think the use cases where the mouse is actually necessary are way slimmer than people really think.

If FreeCAD and similar tools take the approach of the "potter" paradigm where you connect your brain to the medium via your fingers as directly as possible even if the medium is digital/virtual (like most of the CAD programs out there), OpenSCAD is more of a "dark factory" paradigm where you externalize a piece of your mind/expertise into a program that encodes all of your expertise and the program acts on the medium on your behalf. (And in the case of OpenSCAD, the program is kindof "made of the same thing as the medium itself.")

In the "potter" paradigm:

  • You end up with a finished product, but devoid of any accounting of the decisions which went into making the finished product.
  • Your metaphysical "finger prints" make it into the end product. The tiniest twitch of a finger is reflected in the final product, even if it's an unconscious motion.
  • Altering earlier steps that came earlier in the process isn't as easy. Think of a painter layering paints to capture the subtle tones of human skin and then deciding that four layers down they wish they'd done something different. To fix it, they'd have to cover part of the image and redo all the steps manually. (And yes, undo chains attempt mitigate this somewhat, but imperfectly since reapplying later steps isn't necessarily perfect.)
  • Excessive precision isn't typically possible.
  • Making another, similar asset is a manual process that can't reuse the steps/expertise that went into building previous ones cleanly.
  • There's no time spent after finishing your work where the computer has to work/chug to produce the finished product.
  • Parameterized builds are less natural.
  • For digital assets, almost always involves using a pointing device.

In the "dark factory" paradigm:

  • You end up not just with a finished product, but also a program that gives much more insight into how the product was built and what decisions were made in the process of constructing it.
  • Only conscious decisions go into the final product.
  • Altering earlier steps can be done much more cleanly and later steps can be written in such a way that they "automatically" inherit properties introduced by changes in earlier steps.
  • Perfection(ism?) by default. The perfect may be at risk of becoming the enemy of the good.
  • Later, similar assets can reuse the logic from earlier assets where there are similarities.
  • You might spend some time waiting for your program to finish running before your asset is ready.
  • Parameterization is like breathing. It's arguably easier than not parameterizing.
  • Requires no mouse or pointing device. Just a text editor.

And mind you, a lot of programs try to kindof live somewhere in the middle. Being extremely mouse-driven while still supporting parameterization. Or doing sophisticated things with

I'm not trying to advocate against the "potter" paradigm. There are benefits and drawbacks to both. And I can't bash just doing what works for you. But a) the "potter" paradigm doesn't work for me very well at all and the "dark factory" paradigm does and b) I very much believe that the "dark factory" paradigm is so underserved as to be nearly non-existent. I know of OpenSCAD (and ImplicitCAD and a few others in the CAD space) and Graphviz and a few others that were suggested to me in this comment tree. And CodeComic which I personally wrote. And I'm working on another such DSL for making 3D models/assets for games and 3D animations. (Think "art" rather than "engineering". FreeCAD is to OpenSCAD as Blender is to what I'm building. Yes I'm planning to Open Source it in the near-ish future.) But there's so little in that realm.

So, as you can imagine I really love OpenSCAD. I'd be very surprised to find myself using anything else for CAD in the future that wasn't a DSL.

P.S. Maybe I should start a blog. Heh.

[-] thejml@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I love OpenSCAD because not only can I easily parameterize things, and define libraries for commonly used stuff but I can also combine it with my Git setup to get all the benefits of code provenance and backups and change sets and such.

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago

OnShape is what I use. Fusion is fine, but a little heavy for me.

FreeCAD is just slightly too clunky for what I use it for, but I'll keep trying every release to see if I change my mind.

In the meantime, OnShape is cross platform cause it's all in browser and I don't care about my designs being public. I actually post them all free anyway.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the meantime, OnShape is cross platform cause it’s all in browser and I don’t care about my designs being public. I actually post them all free anyway.

The biggest issue with their license is that they went so hard on protecting themselves hosting it, that they basically give everyone BUT the creator the right to monetize a public design. It's an offensively sloppy ToU, or at least it was the last time I checked it.

[-] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Do make sure to retry freecad if you havent in a while - they finally merged their big update that made faces not break - its still got a learning curve but its far less frustrating now

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

OpenSCAD. Nothing for the faint of heart, you need to know what you are doing, but it is perfect for programmers like me.

[-] Jocarnail@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

FreeCAD and OpenSCAD. FreeCAD is steadily getting better and better.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Blender for most things, freecad sometimes

[-] DavidP@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

OpenScad because I do simple things like funnels or part bins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iceberg314@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

I'm still learning FreeCAD, but so far is seems just fine to me! Just different from what I am used to. But there are a few good channels on YouTube that do good tutorials

[-] meowmeow@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago

What are you used to?

[-] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

I mainly use Blender and manually type in the sizes for things, make heavy use of the boolean operators to make holes and cutouts. I would like to learn FreeCAD eventually. I refuse to use proprietary products and services for my hobby projects.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Some of it will depend on what your goals and OS are. OnShape is pretty good, and being in-browser it's inherently cross-platform. BUT... their free tier has the single worst licensing setup imaginable: your designs are public, you can't make a single cent off them, BUT any paying customer (and arguably any other user at all) can. They also jump straight from free to enterprise pricing.

Fusion you know. Licensewise, the free version gives you a small grace zone to make a couple of bucks without issues, and you can at elast keep your designs to yourself.

SolidWorks has an extremely heavy and unfriendly web interface, but their in-browser parametric 3D CAD is better than it used to be, and you can get a maker plan for $25-$50 a year that gives you a little wiggle room to sell a few trinkets and not get blasted if someone or something rats you out to Dassault. If you're on Windows, you'll also be able to install proper SolidWorks (though files will be watermarked to limit them to a hobbyist/maker install.

Solid Edge is a bit clunkier than (real) SolidWorks or Fusion, is windows only, and there's also a doughnut hole for limited commercial use, but it's the full software and it's free as in beer.

Since they cleared up the worst of the toponaming issue, FreeCAD is way better than it used to be. I still feel like the moment you have to do anything more than draw/extrude/fillet, then all the clunkiness comes back, though. It's a brilliant project in its way, but it remains a mixed bag, shall we say.

I paid for a permanent license for my version of Alibre Design, and that's what I generally use. It's somewhere between SolidEdge and Solidworks in user-friendliness, and more than powerful enough for my keyboards and random widgets. I also do like the simplicity of owning my license and therefore fully controlling my designs, but it wasn't cheap, probably two years' worth of monthly payments on the Shapr3D usable tier or the fancy Fusion tier, so I will probably keep plugging along for a while yet. They have a more basic product (Atom) that's missing some fairly useful features, but is still parametric and is rather cheap. It's also all Windows only, though I keep hearing the next version will play nice with Wine/Proton. For now, my investment with Alibre is pretty much THE reason I occasionally boot back into Windows.

TinkerCAD (opwned by Autodesk like Fusion is) is great for certain things, and the "make shape, set solid or hole" workflow is much more intuitive for the abject beginner, but if you're on Fusion you're already past the need for it, i'd think.

There are other players (Rhino, Plasticity, DesignSpark, SolveSpace, among others), but Fusion, Shapr3D (for single parts only, no assemblies),OnShape, SolidEdge, FreeCAD, Alibre, and Solidworks pretty much cover mechanical CAD that's (1) full-featured, (2) 3D, (3) got parametric history and (4) available with usable free or maker versions.

[-] TotallyWorthLife@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

FreeCAD, but basically because it was free and open source when I started learning (which wasn't long ago anyways)

[-] kuroshido@ani.social 5 points 1 week ago

I use FreeCAD, Fusion, and Solidworks. I don’t love freecad as it’s unintuitive and clunky. Solidworks is powerful and okay but I often find myself fighting with it.

Fusion, so far has been the one I like most, but it doesn’t run on Linux which forces me to keep my MacBook around. The collaboration features in fusion are good and it handles step files way better than solidworks does.

I know Rhino is really good for the price, so maybe consider testing it out. I believe the licensing is perpetual.

[-] tuxed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

FreeCAD, but (from a pure usability perspective) OnShape is quite good if you just want something done (note my CAD usage is fairly limited).

[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

FreeCAD for most things. Microcad for anything I need to script. I hear OpenSCAD is promising.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

OnShape. If you're familiar with Fusion360, OnShape requires almost no additional learning. Workflows are pretty much the exact same. It's free under the guise that everything you make is OnShapes IP. But if you're looking to model casually and aren't making things you wish to patent, it's great.

Not open source if that's a requirement.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TruePe4rl@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

FreeCAD, runs on a damn potato. Fusion bakes it into charcoal instead. At least that is my experience on a kinda low-end laptop.

[-] meowmeow@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago

Oh, fusion is a heavy beast for sure. I just can’t stand FreeCAD’s interface.

I just wish someone would make an open source project with sketch based modeling and…. That’s all! I don’t need materials, rendering etc. I literally only need STL export.

But it needs to be as easy as shapr3d—which is marvelous, but $38usd/m for some stupid reason.

[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

What sort of precision are you not getting from blender?

Once you set the parameters (I set mine to mm), I have found it to be accurate enough to make additional tools with which to measure.

Mind you, I don't need accuracy down past a mm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mrb2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I use autodesk inventor, which is like the more professional version of fusion360. But there is no free version and it is very expensive, i have a free student licence.

I like it way more than fusion360, and it is much better at Assembly's. Still clumsy sometimes.

It doesn't run on linux so i just remote into an old windows laptop when i need it.

I have tried freecad and onshape a lillte but i am just so used to inventor that its harder to use them.

[-] PostProcess@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Fusion 360 as well. I think it's great for rapid development, I'd love some of the paid options but not enough. Haven't found anything else that comes close to its power whilst still costing nothing.

[-] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Onshape is the way to go for free tier CAD.

Otherwise TinkerCAD can work, it's just more of an MS Paint version of CAD.

[-] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Onshape is nice and I enjoy using it, but the free tier has some really absurd caveats that anyone considering the platform should be aware of:

Free users are restricted from commercial use and all designs are publicly-available.

Additionally, while free users technically continue to own the IP they create, they lose control of licensing rights. Section 1.7.2.2 Your content - Intellectual Property of the Terms of Use states

For any Public Document owned by a Free Plan User created on or after August 7, 2018, or any Public Document created prior to that date without a LICENSE tab, Customer grants a worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive license to any End User or third party accessing the Public Document to use the intellectual property contained in Customer’s Public Document without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Document, and to permit persons to whom the Document is made available to do the same.

In theory, this means that while free users cannot monetize designs they made on the platform, paid users can take those files and monetize them without the consent of the creator(s).

[-] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

90% fusion

9% tinkercad

1% dicking around in OnShape, getting frustrated, and giving up

[-] Trev625@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Fusion360 for non-organic and Blender (with add-ons) for organic. I don't like fusion360 for organic stuff. FreeCAD was supposed to get a big update at some point but I never tried it. Autodesk Inventor was alright but I didn't like it as much as Fusion360.

[-] meowmeow@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago

FreeCAD, as of today, looks and feels like it was made in 2010 or earlier. I’m sure there is a type of person who FreeCAD check all their boxes and excites them to no end, but I am, sadly, not in that group.

[-] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Default look n feel does feel a couple of decades outdated. But it can easily be customized to look look much more modern and comfortable.

Youtube tutorials on how to get started often begins with customizing the user interface before even starting the modeling tutorial. I recommend Deltahedra and Mangojelly on YouTube

[-] Bilbo@hobbit.world 2 points 1 week ago

Everyone is wrong. OpenSCAD is so much better than anything else. It's so much easier to just write code. I regret wasting so much time learning Fusion.

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Plasticity. It's the best balance I've found between cost and usability. And it doesn't force you to save your files on someone's cloud.

You pay annually and get updates but when your year is up you can choose to pay less for each subsequent year or stop paying and continue using the version you currently have indefinitely without future updates.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shads@lemy.lol 2 points 1 week ago

I bounced pretty hard off Free ad and ended up using OnShape. I don't feel great about it though.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

22715 readers
231 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS