Yesterday I went to the Fox news website to see their version of top news. It was this story, that a judge would apologize to someone who tried to shoot our "dear" leader.
So, I tried to post it earlier, but couldn't figure out how to get the video out from behind the paywall.
Basically, WaPo got high resolution versions of the security cam footage.
... I don't think this dude fired a single shot.
I think that the Secret Service guy who was shot, was shot by another security guard.
Basically:
O[]------------>
X
Where the arrow is the dude running through the metal detector, O is SS dude who was shot, X is other guard.
As the dude is running between the two, X fires off at least 3 shots, tracking running dude.
O appears to become injured very soon after X fires one of those shots, where that shot is fired while X is basically pointing at O.
But you never see a muzzle flash from the shotgun.
You do see them from X's pistol though.
Also, in the audio of the event, everything I've seen and heard... all the shots sound similar.
And these shots all would have occured in the same space, the same hallway.
A shotgun blast does not sound like a pistol shot, its... significantly louder, has a different kind of waveform.
What is even more insane is that apparently the assailant was never even hit.
... So the only actual injury in all of this was friendly fire.
Like yeah its still insane to sprint through that with a shotgun... but nobody even hit the dude?
Fucking clownshow security.
Also, it would be immensely simple to figure out what actually shot the SS dude O.
His bulletproof vest caught the shot, preventing him from being more seriously injured.
So... if it caught a bunch of buckshot... it was the shotgun.
If it caught a 9mm... it was friendly fire.
Yeah it was really obviously friendly fire, dunno if he shot after that recording or not though
Don't worry, I'm sure we will find out the truth with Kash 'Bugeyes' Patel on the job.
I’m honestly reasonably confident that this whole show is (yet another) setup/false-flag, and the dude is just a patsy.
Hence the suicide watch...practice ice makes perfect
denied a Bible
Lol ON NO NOT THAT.
They think they're doing something important by not giving him a Bible. Fucking laughable
Denying any one of a prisoner's rights is the first step to denying all of a prisoner's rights.
If not the right to his religious text, then why the right to be visited by a priest? If not a priest, then why his family? And if not family, then why a lawyer -- and if not a lawyer, then why even bother with a trial?
I mean sure, if you completely ignore the slippery slope fallacy.
Allowing a religious figure to meet with an inmate isn't even close to the same thing as a lawyer or family member.
I mean sure, if you completely ignore the slippery slope fallacy.
Did you forget what timeline we're living in? We're not slipping down a slope, we're tumbling off a cliff.
Yeah, in this reality they just start out with refusing access to a lawyer. No slope needed.
While a worthless rag to many of us, it is the one thing you could always expect to be granted to help break the monotony of incarceration. Being denied even that, leaving one with only their thoughts, in custody, is generally considered cruel and unusual punishment.
Being denied a bible likely means he is being denied other reading materials
So you are on board with it ?
I just don't think it rises to the same level of seriousness as the other things they're doing
You’re absolutely right, and that’s why they did it. Fascists love to boil frogs in order to create permission structures.
FeelsBadMan
I mean, we have US citizens being detained without due process. I think we're beyond that.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.