584
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

It's funny how Jon Stewart can say the same things as Return2Ozma and the .world mod team doesn't remove the posts about it, or say Stewart handed the election. While he has infinitely more sway and influence than someone on a niche internet forum.

I'm amazed this post has stayed up from the same mods who banned R2O and others for saying the same thing.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I feel like the canary in a coal mine haha

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

They hated you for speaking the truth and when confronted with it again, they pretend they always listened.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 26 points 17 hours ago

What I don't understand is, if booger-eating MAGA could hijack the Republican party a decade ago, why are progressive grassroots still waiting for permission from Woodstock attendants?

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

because the republican party is relatively united in thought and desire and via who is paying them all off.

The democratic party is more akin to 35 parties in a trenchcoat all pretending to be one party, thanks entirely to the forced nature of the two party system our government has.

And a lot of those in seats of power in the DNC and Democratic Party have the same masters/paylords as the Republicans and want the Democratic party to be nothing more than controlled opposition.

Firebrands like AOC and Bernie tend to get elected by accident, instead of by purpose, in the grand scheme.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago

There was a lot of money behind the tea party and then maga takeover. Its just not there the same way for the progressive since the billionaires are all on the other side or not getting heavily involved.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

MAGA did it from the top down. Trump became president and was able to strong arm people below him. He was even able to switch the RNC chair to a family member.

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The DNC snubbing Platner is literally the only decent thing they've done in a long time.

The man is a cryptofacist murdering psychopath. I read his reddit history. I know what blackwater and Abu Ghraib are. If there was any justice in the world, this guy would be tried for his crimes and locked away for life.

The idea that Jon Stewart, a Jew, is simping for a guy with a Nazi tattoo he took 40 years to cover up is remarkable.

[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 8 points 9 hours ago

I WAS going to Vote for him but After reading This I'm NOW going to Vote for the Woman sending MY Taxdollars to LITERAL Nazis! THANK YOU!

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Cool story can't wait to vote him in anyway. He's running on a progressive pro-labor platform. It's popular across the aisles and this weak smear campaign has done nothing to hurt him. yet here you are still repeating it. If he's a Nazi than what is Susan collins. Who would you chose? Susan collins?

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 1 points 27 minutes ago

smear campaign

I read his public reddit posts bragging about murder, looked at his lifelong Nazi tattoo (before he covered it up for office), and formed the only possible conclusion an honest person could.

Alas, your pivot into trolley problems further entrenches your liberalism. Good luck with the Nazi shit when capitalism continues to degrade.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 14 hours ago

Is it covered up currently?

Never too late to bail. It takes longer to get correct potentially but if we dont let people stop being shitty then we can't ever expect them to try.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Erna_muse@lemmy.zip 9 points 16 hours ago

People get too deep into conspiracy theories. Establishment politics is problematic but I think people need to engage with how things actually work.

The rich and powerful are going to petition the government and the government will have some corruption. So the how is important because it informs how we put them back in their box.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
584 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29618 readers
1620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS