496

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has announced plans to expand the use of the federal death penalty, including through the deployment of firing squads.

The announcement on Friday was part of a policy document issued by the Department of Justice, setting out the legal argument for various methods of execution.

It touted steps for “restoring and strengthening” the death penalty as integral to the pursuit of justice.

“The Department of Justice acted to restore its solemn duty to seek, obtain, and implement lawful capital sentences — clearing the way for the Department to carry out executions once death-sentenced inmates have exhausted their appeals,” the Justice Department said in a news release.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 204 points 3 weeks ago
  1. Build massive secretive camps that house thousands and thousands of people

  2. Raise a personal gestapo to hunt down and disappear immigrants

  3. Pass laws that brand anyone left of Reagan as a domestic terrorist

  4. Call for more firing squads

  5. ???

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 80 points 3 weeks ago

They don't call it fascist dystopia for no reason.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

You forgot to profit between each step.

[-] PineRune@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

The last step is to privatize all the previous steps.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago
  1. Americans continue to do fuck all, giving it their tacit approval
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 115 points 3 weeks ago

Whenever capital punishment comes up, I am reminded of the hypocrisy of American Christians.

Pretty much every Christian claims to believe that killing is prohibited by the ten commandments. In a democracy, if you vote for a politician who supports the death penalty, you are asking them to kill a person on your behalf. A Christian should not be able to vote for a politician who supports the death penalty.

Compare that with abortion. The bible says virtually nothing about abortion except how to pray for one. If you vote for a pro-choice politician, nobody is being killed on your behalf.

Compare these two, and it's obvious that a Christian who votes for a pro-death-penalty and anti-abortion candidate is voting against their own religion. But they claim to be voting for Christian values, which is pure hypocrisy.

[-] leoj@piefed.social 57 points 3 weeks ago

I think we are reaching a point where its an open secret that the words of Jesus are purely marketing for Christianity and the reality is quite uglier.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago
[-] leoj@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

yeah but the realization for large portions of the population is what is new, although I agree that it has always been just marketing!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

I'm an atheist and I know not to subsume all of Christianity under white evangelicalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

As someone raised in the church, but did not fall into white nationalism like so many Republicans, they will absolutely never be swayed by logic. They're literally brainwashed in a cult. Jesus is no different than a member of antifa to them. They only care about themselves, their cult, its leader, and seeing other people hurt. None of those things are in the ten commandments. If judgement day came today, every single one of them would have a reserved seat in a particularly nasty place in Hell.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jtrek@startrek.website 90 points 3 weeks ago

I hope this is foreshadowing for the trump regime being executed as war criminals.

[-] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Firing squads are too clean, I want gallows, I want gallows run by someone who ain’t any count at running a gallows, so they all die in terrible ways

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 28 points 3 weeks ago

I think I read that some WW2 Nazi wanted to be killed by firing squad after Nuremberg, but they told him no. Firing squads are for soldiers. Hanging is for criminals, so he would hang.

[-] ReachMinusOne@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like we need to resurrect this guy. He was allegedly pretty terrible at his job, and several of the individuals he hanged did not die a quick death.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 74 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing should be a clearer indication that the death penalty should not exist than lunatics like him controlling it.

[-] frightful5680@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's funny how all the countries with autocrats or legal corruption love the death penalty

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zak@lemmy.world 59 points 3 weeks ago

If I supported capital punishment, I'd be in favor of firing squads over lethal injection. It's more honest. Shooting someone is clearly meant to kill while lethal injection dresses it up like a medical procedure.

I oppose capital punishment though. The criminal justice system is not reliable enough to only punish those truly guilty of the worst crimes, it doesn't seem to be a more effective deterrent than imprisonment, and it usually ends up costing more than imprisonment for an offender's natural lifespan.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Who would do the actual shooting though? For me this presents a problem. It can go two ways:

  • We have to employ someone that doesn't want to kill people, but does it anyway in an act of duty while suffering the psychological trauma every time they do their job.

Or even worse...

  • We have to employ someone that does want to kill people, and we're paying them to do it.
[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 weeks ago

That's actually why it's a squad.

A single executioner would be more than capable of delivering a killing shot. Hell, they could just shoot them in the head with a handgun.

The squad means that no one member knows if they're the one that actually delivered the killing shot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Select one person from the jury that convicted and assign them the role of carrying out their judgment.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I thought about that too, but juries usually don't decide the sentence (in this case, execution). Juries just determine guilty or not on the charges. Sentencing is usually decided by the presiding judge after the jury renders its verdict on the charges and are already dismissed.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 3 weeks ago

Abolish the death penalty completely no reason to trust the state with this power.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

I hope he does this, then the next president comes in and trump gets sentenced to death for treason lol.

Unlikely but a nice dream

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 16 points 3 weeks ago

I have absolutely no faith anyone will ever give these psychos any consequenses, especially not any democrat. That would mean they themselves would be open to consequenses, and that simply won't do for the ruling class. The worst that is ever going to happen to Trump through legal and peaceful means, is that he'll be sentenced to house arrest at Mar-a-lago, and even that is doubtful. Any other punishment will have to be done by the people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Jako302@feddit.org 35 points 3 weeks ago

And everyone on this side of the pond said I'm overreacting by calling trumps immigrant detention centers "concentration camps", but here we are. Even the Nazis didn't start as fast with their genocide as the orange turd seems to try.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 weeks ago

He means Death Squads. Every Republican accusation was an admission of guilt.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 weeks ago

In a two tiered justice system where the rich have no accountability I can't see this being problematic at all. America is a shit hole country now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lanske@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

Will they start with child rapists?!

[-] frightful5680@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Nope just immigrants

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Can we start with the pedophiles?

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, but only the poor ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] la508@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

The death penalty is anathema to civilised society.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 weeks ago

I warned about this before the election. People thought I was crazy...

Republicans have literally been talking about this for years...

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah but Harris was once a district attorney. So we get this. Its all the Demmicrats fault.

[-] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

The fact this is still getting downvotes is pathetic.

Lemmys gonna lemming themselves in front of the firing squads they did nothing to oppose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Iamcanadian@piefed.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Searching for ways to go as low as possible, this orange administration. Very creative.

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Shooting the pedos? Let’s start there.

[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Gee, I wonder if capital punishment is going to be recommended for "anti-American values", etc.

Totally no way that's going to happen.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Let's start with them.

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago

Suprised they're not at the point where they are looking to streamline executions by creating large multi-occupancy gas chambers.

But I guess even their role models started with firing squads, so nothing to see here...

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Again I ask.

Does anyone really think those camps are only for immigrants, or criminals?

Bullshit. They're for us.

[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Always a fucking day he comes up with an awful idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

He should first familiarize himself with Nicolae Ceaușescu and how well his grifting and bullshitting worked out for him. Firing squads might sound less romantic after that.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

Don't let the trump folk know about being "drawn and quartered". Those fuckers will jump on that like white on rice. Can you say "trump/epstein" files?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

For themselves?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
496 points (100.0% liked)

News

37694 readers
1079 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS