If your goal is a personal setup, maybe for gaming, I would recommend Bazzite, it is very user-friendly and designed to be as stable as possible (you can switch to an earlier version of the system in case an update or something makes your pc bug). They have a very nice "app store" (bazaar, based on apps distributed as "flatpaks").

I personally use an Arch-derivative to access some niche software (the Arch "app marketplace" has a community-wide range), but Arch-based distros are a bit more technical to use. Currently, the most popular Arch-based distribution is "CachyOS".

Having used both, I haven't heard anything about these distros concerning privacy.

"Linux Mint", a Ubuntu derivative, is generally praised as a good entry point into the linux world. It is supposed to spin and enhance its ubuntu base into something very user friendly as well.

Gets hardened, privacy focussed distro.

Logs into Google on browser.

What's up with all these people treating Lemmy like a search engine recently?

Ubuntu now doesn't enable telemetry by default, but ironically I always enable telemetry when it is disabled and disable when enabled by default.

Linux distributions are miles ahead in terms of privacy compared to other commercial operating systems, so just use one, if you want even more privacy, I guess there are distributions that route all your internet through tor.

To answer your second question specifically:

Are there Linux distributions that place a stronger emphasis on privacy?

Yes, luckily most distros do.

If you just want decent privacy, then honestly most of the popular distros are better than Ubuntu.

Ubuntu has a history together with amazon, sending search queries in the application starter for example. There are better distros out there, like Mint.

If you use Debian, even the simple “package popularity contest” is a default “no” in the installer.

That said, your personal conception of privacy is gonna be different than lots of other people’s.

Listen, anything is better than Windows. That being said, Ubuntu is about as close as Linux gets to Windows in data collection and robbing control from the user. It's the only distro I recommend everyone to NOT use.

Depends what your threat model is, if you absolutely want no data about you whatsoever possibly leaving the device because it endangers you then Tails OS is probably the most private distro out there as others have mentioned, but it's use case is specifically to be used for very private stuff and working through a live USB stick so that nothing remains on the device.

For the average person any distro is a huge improvement privacy wise over Windows, though Ubuntu does have ties to Amazon since it's owned by Canonical, so if there's any Linux distro you should avoid for privacy reasons it's Ubuntu. It's still incomparably private relative to Windows, but you have nothing to lose and a lot to gain by choosing other alternatives, Mint is just as easy and user friendly as Ubuntu without most of the bloat and Amazon crap.

Most distros don’t collect any data by default.

Basically any distro not built and maintained by a company will be a thousand times more private than Mac or windows. Arch and Debian are both good in that regard, most distros are derived from those. There is also Fedora which is a community project, but it’s very heavily involved with Red Hat inc who is owned by IBM. I’ve never heard about any privacy issues there, but, it’s worth keeping in mind.

If you want something super secure and locked down in regards to privacy, there is Tails which has a lot of neat tricks and tor built in. Not sure I’d recommend it as a daily driver but it’s got it’s use cases.

It’s important to understand that many distro’s are usually based off of another.

We got Debian based distros such as Debian, Ubuntu, PopOS, KaliLinux, LinuxMint and so on, Arch based distros such as CachyOS, SteamOS, Arch and so on and Fedora based distros such as Fedora, Nobara, Bazzite.

Once you learn one of these base distros switching to another within its field is easy as majority of shell commands will be identical.

Hannah Montana Linux

I'd like to suggest Linux Mint: It allows you to use guides and software written for Ubuntu but disables all the scummy stuff.

tbh you'll likely find yourself better using anything else that isn't Ubuntu. Debian is cool if you're okay with your desktop environment being a bit behind (as for apps you can use flatpaks for the most up to the date, it also is good if you need most app support as it can install .deb) or arch if you want to learn a bit more about how your little penguin lives inside that metal box of yours! Fedora I am not sure as I think they implement or will implement telemetry.

One last thing is that not all telemetry is bad. if you take a look at KDE's initial prompt for telemetry it is anonymous and is used to simply try and make the DE better

As a user added: Fedora does opt-in telemetry which is the same as Debian's where if you want you can enable it but by default it's disabled

Privacy or Security? Security would be something like Fedora Atomic. Privacy (and security?) QubesOS , TailsOS But as Linux is FOSS, you can just take any distro and form it as you like.

As others said Ubuntu got kinda scummy. I always send people that are new or have decision paralysis here

Yes, it's accurate. Although I enjoyed using Ubuntu (iirc started with 5.10 or 6.10) due to it's friendliness to newcomers, Canonical is on the business side of Linux distributions (think Redhat).

Debian (which Ubuntu is derived from), is privacy friendly and leans heavily towards the open source ethos imo.

With that being said there's tons of options out there. Distrowatch is a great place to window shop before grabbing a live .iso :)

There are dozens of articles about why Ubuntu has drawn criticism, here is an example: https://abh.ai/blog/why-ubuntu-and-canonical-drew-criticism-many-members-foss-community

I would recommend you read some of them to make up your own mind, and don't rely too much on opinions here. Privacy is a broad term, only you know what is important to you and where you would draw the line.