613
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Mamdani Act would amend existing immigration law to prohibit the admission and naturalization of any noncitizen who is or was a member of, affiliated with, or advocates for a Chinese communist, communist, socialist, Islamic fundamentalist or other totalitarian party—or any organization that advocates those ideologies. Under its deportation provisions, a noncitizen already in the United States could be removed if they engage in advocacy for socialism, communism, Marxism or Islamic fundamentalism, distribute or publish material promoting those ideologies or hold membership in affiliated organizations at any point after admission.

You know he is a much needed anti-toxin, especially when they name a bill after him. Let the healing begin.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 159 points 6 days ago

We MUST deport ANYONE who DOESNT like having Sex With Children!

-Republicans!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rockSlayer 119 points 6 days ago

That means this bill has to define socialism. Good luck with that one bucko, if you have 10 socialists in a room, you get 11 definitions /s

I'm genuinely curious how it gets defined. I'm wondering if it can be sidestepped with a simple word change

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 92 points 6 days ago

It's reds under the bed. If anyone in a position of power says you're a socialist then you're a socialist and you get made stateless and dumped in Nigeria.

[-] rockSlayer 31 points 6 days ago

Yea this is absolutely red scare bs, but I'm morbidly curious about this thought crime

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That means this bill has to define socialism.

It's not meant to have a definition. That's why the proposed law denies judicial review. The "definition" is supposed to be whatever the ICE ~~Officer(s)~~ Gestapo wants it to be.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 40 points 5 days ago

That's not an issue with the law, it's a feature. They don't need to prove you fit a definition. They only need to prove that they can call you a socialist. Anyone to the left of whatever positions they don't like are in danger of this law. It doesn't matter if you'd call yourself a socialist, only if they would.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

This is going hard in the direction of the Nazi Germany "Enabling Act" of 1933.

[-] BeardededSquidward 10 points 4 days ago

Or McCarthyism. Don't forget that one. Another classic.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 5 days ago

They would kill Jesus himself

[-] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 5 days ago

It isn't a real Jesus unless it comes from the crucifixion region in Jerusalem, otherwise its just sparkling hispanic

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 33 points 5 days ago

"Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?"

[-] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I got a better bill idea.

The Trump-Epstein act: which mandates the death penalty for pedophiles.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago

Reminder for anyone still confused. American conservatives are actual, real-life fascists.

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 5 days ago

Mamdani is a centrist, he isn't left. But since the Republicans are alt right and the Democrats are right, they consider everything else to be far left and label anything that isn't right as communist. They don't know what communism is. Even Trump labeled people communist nazis. Communists and nazis are the opposite of eachother. Americans are so, so fucking dumb.

[-] prole 50 points 5 days ago

He might not be as left as you'd like, but calling Mamdani a centrist is just ignorant

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 83 points 6 days ago

So he’d have deported Einstein, then?

[-] Pimp_C@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 days ago

Without a doubt these pieces of shit would've deported him, ur watching the same bad movie with an orange rapist as the lead actor, arent u, lol?

[-] Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

Mccarthyism round two, let's go! Screw learning from your mistakes!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

"any organization that advocates those ideologies" is so god damn unconstitutional, it is not even funny

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

this is what you get for not hanging your fascists

[-] neuromorph@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

So republicans are Publicly trying to end social security. Got it. start running those ads.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

The Democrats won't because their donors won't let them

[-] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

We are so back, baby! [to one of the worst times in modern human history]

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 56 points 5 days ago

First amendment lawyers are gonna have a FIELD DAY with this one 😭

[-] anthropozaen@feddit.org 21 points 5 days ago

Watch the Trump admin revoke their licences.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 days ago

There should be a negative consequence for proposing obviously unconstitutional bullshit with no chance of passing just for publicity

[-] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 19 points 5 days ago

Banning socialists is some real commie shit these fucking pinko politicians

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago
[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago

Authoritarianism is an admission of abject weakness.

White supremacists are the weakest and most brittle snowflakes.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 51 points 6 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

How about we get a bill that bans conservatives from the US?

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

IT'S GUILLOTINE AND JUSTICE TIME!

GUILLOTINE AND JUSTICE TIME!

GUILLOTINE AND JUSTICE WITH A BASEBALL BAT!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

Yeah, no. I'd much rather have all the MAGA deported. It would really make this country 10 times better overnight. Much less murder and crime instantly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Chip fails to realize that Krasnov's father-in-law would be deported, he was a f'n Yugoslavian Communist Party member. Preventing pedophiles, rapists and felons from public office would be a better bill.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 38 points 6 days ago

Freedom of speech, unless it's speech we don't like

[-] night_petal@piefed.social 22 points 5 days ago

It turns out McCarthyism 2.0 is going to be even worse.

[-] Licksrocks@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If it applies to Islamic fundamentalists, does it also apply to Christian nationalists?

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

The name of this bill is how you know they are terrified of him.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago

Remember MCarthyism? It's back - in redneck form!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 21 points 5 days ago

Can we ban fascists, theists, and other right wing boot-lickers from the US? We seem to have an infestation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Solitaire20X6@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

What about Nazis? They're pretty bad. No? Huh. I wonder why.

[-] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 31 points 6 days ago
[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago

Does this encroach on first amendment or can they just ban whoever they don't like under the guise of national security?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago
[-] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 days ago

Fuck this regressive shithole of a country! Goddam!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 days ago

Yay! Free violations of the first amendment!

[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

Who wants to dig McCarthy up, stick him up on a cross and prop him up in this guy's front yard?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
613 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29552 readers
1068 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS