78
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 62 points 3 weeks ago

Realistically?

  • Housing that doesn't cost a fortune

  • Healthcare that doesn't bankrupt you

  • Food that's both affordable and worth eating

None of it is futuristic. All of it feels further away than ever.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 19 points 3 weeks ago

Your answer is something you want to force into the conversation, not what OP asked.

You're not wrong, but that's not the conversation man.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the reason we don't have those isn't technological. We could have it today if we collectively decided that we wanted it.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

That’s not really how it works, or we’d already have them. People in China have those things because they beat the fascist KMT back to Formosa, and by force subordinated the bourgeoisie and the remnants of feudalism.

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well, that plus militant organizing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

That's not tech, that's policy. Technologically there are no holdups to this, capitalism just needs it to not be so

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago

I thought VR/AR would be farther along. There was a pitch 10 years ago that VR would be the “final platform” in that anything a phone, TV, tablet, or computer could do could be easily emulated in VR.

Unfortunately it’s still all walled gardens. Also nobody wants to wear that shit for more than an hour.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago

More specifically I thought one of the approaches to an omni-treadmill would catch on enough for an at-home model to be available to the public.

[-] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Brain implants are progressing, so I'm still hopeful to see full-dive VR in my lifetime. Also scared of how it will be enshtitfied.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah... as amazing as full dive VR would be, I'd be afraid that weaponized would be a better term for how it would be implemented than enshitified.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 weeks ago

LED light bulbs were supposed to last a bajillion hours. When they came out around 2010-ish they were still expensive and I spent many hundreds of dollars replacing every single light bulb in my house, thinking I would basically never have to replace a light bulb again.

It's 2026 and I now replace the LED bulbs in my house almost as often as I replaced incandescent bulbs. Seriously? LEDs are solid-state technology. There are no moving parts, no gases, no hot filaments...

I understand that it's probably on purpose; if everyone replaced all the light bulbs in their house with LED bulbs that lasted basically forever then who would buy more light bulbs from light bulb manufacturers.

But it's still just dumb. Either LED technology is flawed, or our economic system that incentivizes a constant cycle of replacing bulbs is flawed. This should should not exist in 2026.

[-] JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network 17 points 3 weeks ago

no hot filaments...

There may not be filaments, but heat is still an issue for LEDs.

Some bulb manufacturers basically overdrive cheaper diodes to get extra brightness at the cost of generating extra heat. Some of those manufacturers compensate for the heat in some way, others don't even bother and produce bulbs with a service life of months instead of decades. Some of these are fly-by-night online sellers that won't exist anymore by the time their products start to fail. Others are established brands that people will blindly purchase based on a reputation that no longer matches reality. There are some reliable brands out there if you read up on it, but why the fuck should we have to research every little inane item in our life?

Aside from corporate greed, though, there are other reasons heat causes early LED bulb failure. Two common ones are incompatible devices on the same circuit (like light dimmers), and installing the bulb in an enclosure without adequate heat dissipation (like a ceiling 'boob' light).

I've been all LED for well over a decade, and have had a good experience so far. I personally tend to buy smart bulbs that can put out way more light than I need, and run them at 20-50% brightness most of the time. Feit Electric and Govee's basic smart bulbs have been pretty reliable for me, but I admit I'm a pretty small sample size. I know I'm paying a premium for that approach, but it's not unreasonable and I do prefer not having to worry about it.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Something is wrong with the ones you're buying, then.

Studies show that they do, on average, last dozens of times longer. Personally I replace them way less often than incandescent.

I suppose the earliest ones were worse and there are definitely garbage ones out there. And even good brands have a did here and there. And if you have poor/inconsistent power, or placing them in hot, enclosed fixtures, they don't perform as well as they could.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago

I bought some on clearance about a decade ago, my wife thought I was crazy buying 20 bulbs, I gave 1/4 of them away and I've still not run out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

From my experience, what tends to get messed up is the internal wiring. The actual leds will continue working fine, but cheap/shitty wiring will make the lamp stop working

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago

When I was a kid in the 80s I thought we'd absolutely have some kind of moon base by now. More space stuff in general. What is more "future" than space?

Green energy is maybe 10 years behind where younger me would have wished it to be, it feels we're close to some big breakthroughs. I'm still hopefully to see some game changing things in my lifetime.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

Better general medical science. So much of what we use is very old tech. We still can't regrow cartligage. We still pin bones together with titanium screws. We still mostly use fiberglass casts (though better alternatives exist). We still catch the common cold.

[-] folaht@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

When I went to the hospital for a broken bone, I thought this tech was already there since tech was advancing so quickly, going from Pac-Man to Super Mario 64 in 16 years.

My vision:
'At the very least I'll get to see a 3D image of my broken bone and maybe there'll be 'dentist chair tools' that can straighten and fill up the bone like a dentist does with your teeth. I mean, we advanced a lot in computer technology right?'

The reality:
'Here's your 1950s X-ray picture. You see that Rorschach test blotch? That's where it's broken. We've done our job, have a good day!... Your visit is over!... You can leave now!...'

That was 30 years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daggermoon@piefed.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

I thought we'd have affordable 8TB SSD's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Ability to live in balance with the earth

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago

Only after the nuclear winter

[-] eightpix@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago
  • Genetic-level diagnoses and treatments.

  • Inexpensive, rapid genome sequencing.

  • Commonplace genetic counselling for more than just pregnancy.

  • Laws in place to govern the collection, use, ownership, and patenting of human genes and genetic information.

  • Cloned tissues (i.e. blood, skin), organs (i.e. heart, lungs, kidneys) for transplant or repair.

I graduated university the same year the Human Genome Project first published completion. Certainly, that project uncovered more questions than answers.

Also, we've done an absolutely garbage job of becoming appropriate stewards of this technology. Primarily, today, it would be used to identify, segregate, subjugate, and eventually kill a portion of the population.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 23 points 3 weeks ago

Compassion, empathy, socialism.

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 22 points 3 weeks ago

Fusion lol.

Better space tech or at least a moon base.

Modular body parts like in cyberpunk

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 4 points 3 weeks ago

Technically we have modular body parts. They are pretty damn good too. Just not good enough that people would replace them because they are vetter.

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 22 points 3 weeks ago

Computer phones. As in I just connect to screen and keyboard, and phone is my main desktop.

Cheaper EVs.

Working lab fusion.

[-] Routhinator@startrek.website 20 points 3 weeks ago

Guillotines and a lineup of billionaires in straight jackets

[-] 404found@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

More of a pet peeve, but I thought IT would be way more stable by now. Everything has so many bugs and it's just accepted. I've grown pessimistic about new tech and I would prefer to wait a couple years before getting it. It's not novel if it's broken.

Side thought, I thought we would have hologram phone calls by now.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago

Phones that can be opened up and have internals replaced, like desktop computers

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

That one is still exclusive to a few select countries and won't ship to mine :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I thought we would finally have haptic touch in our devices. There were some experiments in the past, but it never happened outside of niche industry applications.

Makes me a little bit sad, because being able to feel elements is really useful - I can type blind on my Titan 2 phone (which has a real keyboard) and in cars, it would really improve safety.

[-] safesyrup@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

What would improve car safety is you beeing focused on handling your car and nothing else

[-] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, by being able to feel the controls so can focus your eyes on the road in front of you.

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Level 4 self driving cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I definitely thought we’d have Ar glasses by now

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago
[-] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

I think the self tightening shoes would have been doable. But we still didn't get those.

[-] Xenny@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Nike actually did make those. they sell them.

[-] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

Windshield wipers that don't smear.

[-] wer2@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Self driving cars. Ten years ago I said, "we'll have this worked out in 10 years". What a fool I was.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

A cure for all diseases and illnesses.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You thought this would happen by 2026?

[-] arcine@jlai.lu 6 points 3 weeks ago

Recycling that actually works.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

I thought that by now we would've commercialized at scale alternative battery technologies. We're still using lithium ion even for grid storage and EV's.

Also, I expected we would have put a man on the moon by now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rossman@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Standardized connector for everything with backwards compatibility

[-] catboat@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

I was hoping that by now technology and education would have helped all the humans to realize how to take care of each other and work together for a better tomorrow.

Instead we got this fucking mess that's going on right now all around the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Maglev trains in the US

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

53968 readers
279 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS