309
submitted 7 hours ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

I feel like that's a reverse backhanded compliment. So I guess just compliment.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I always see stories like this and I think to myself I can't even boycott them because I wasn't eating there already. Not that I can really afford to eat out anywhere though...

[-] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Were they a fascist pedophile?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 35 points 5 hours ago

I guess this is how I learn that Chili's is actually still in business

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 hours ago

a trans man who was assigned female at birth

Isn't that what "trans man" means?

[-] null@lemmy.org 12 points 3 hours ago

They gotta dumb it down for people, it's a good thing for informing.

[-] SarahValentine 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If you just say "trans man" at a bunch of people, a significant portion of them will think you mean "a man who has decided they are trans and wants to be a woman". Because recognizing the gender someone identifies as is catering to their delusion or whatever bigots tell themselves to get by.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Before all the recent hullabaloo in recent years, I couldn't remember which meant which way - because I could give two fucks - just let them be who they are.

Now I've had to learn a lot (which I don't resent learning) so I can help stand up for their rights, and it's really easy to remember. But it's sort of like "biweekly" or "semiweekly" before you actually pay attention - both of those terms mean both something that happens twice per week or once every other week (although I tihnk biweekly more strongly implies twice per week, but it can absolutely be used for both).

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I suppose that's true that even people who aren't necessarily bigots can struggle to understand what being trans is. My boomer parents aren't transphobic, but they do struggle with the concept that when a person realizes they're trans it retroactively means that they were always the gender they currently go by, even if they themselves didn't know it at the time. I got into an argument with my dad when he kept calling the child of someone he knew "he" when talking about her in the past before she came out as trans. I tried to explain that, no, she was a she then as well, but didn't know it herself and presented as a he, but he just didn't get it.

[-] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 4 points 2 hours ago

A lot of people are still just not familiar with the terminology surrounding all things trans.

If you just say “trans man” many of them don't go into a weird mental gymnastics session to justify their prejudice, they just go "which one was that again?".

I've been there myself a few years ago and since I learned have explained it to several people who couldn't be further from bigots, they were just not in much personal contact with trans people.

[-] SarahValentine 2 points 2 hours ago

Sorry I didn't mean to say that anyone who doesn't know the difference is a bigot, I meant to say that the general public's lack of awareness about what means what is due to bigots intentionally using the wrong gender or terminology any chance they get. They're muddying the waters.

[-] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

No need to apologize, and sorry that I apparently made you think an apology was required.

I wanted to build on and expand your point, not contradict it.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

I guess they could be intersex? But mostly probably just to make the article accessable to boomers which I think is a fine thing to do.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

And it's okay if they ain't intersex, because havin' a low lerbido or being uh-sexual ain't no big deal, neither.

/jk

[-] obvs@lemmy.world 95 points 7 hours ago

Oh, well I haven’t eaten at Chili's in about 20 years, but I was just talking about going again last week.

Guess I’m not going to do that…

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago

At $60 to $70 for 2 people to eat out? Fuck that.

[-] ShankShill@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Texas Roadhouse family meals (takeout only tho) is where it's at. Near me it's $60 for 4 steaks (28oz total), 2 1lb sides, about a dozen rolls, salad. Or $50 for the same but with 24 chicken tendies instead of steak.

[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Just did this recently, would recommend.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Gotta agree. You can get so much food there for a reasonable amount of money.

[-] hammertime@lemmy.org 30 points 7 hours ago

I’d much rather eat at Chotchkie’s. More flair.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

If I've told you once I've told you 37 times…

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago
[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 3 hours ago

Brain has 37 pieces of flair.

[-] Morphite88@thelemmy.club 11 points 6 hours ago

I just realized this is Mike Judge himself

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 hours ago

Exactly what kind of sex is going on at Chili's? Anything I should know?

Is it getting into the food???

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Judging by the restaurant staff I've known, a lot. Those people fuck more than porn stars.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Line cooks are way uglier than porn stars.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 hours ago

Line cooks tend to be degenerates. The best kind of degenerates.

[-] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

If Chili’s actually gave a shit about “personal values” they wouldn’t be able to hire cooks. Some might pass a drug test because they’re on supervision, but not a single one is going to pass a morality screening.

Source: 20yrs as a line cook.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 3 hours ago

If you lock your keys in your car a line cook can probably get you into it and sell you a dime bag too.

[-] CMLVI@lemmy.world 54 points 7 hours ago

My expectation of "edible food" doesn't align with what Chili's offers, which is why I don't go there. Everyone has their beliefs, I suppose.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 31 points 6 hours ago

So easy, I’ve been accidentally boycotting them for decades.

[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Based on this thread, it sounds like people with enough brainpower to know what pronouns are don’t eat there anyway, so this might actually make Chile’s money.

[-] null@lemmy.org 17 points 6 hours ago

It's entirely possible the employees sucked, but for Chili's to fire them the way they did is nuts. The fact that there's a pattern means there's gonna be some fat paychecks going around.

I'll continue my tradition of not eating at Chili's in support.

[-] pwalshj@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

I guess I'll continue to never patronize a Chili's. Wtfuck is "Chili's" any way? Is it someone's nickname? Do they have a chili that owns things?

[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Much like how Nigerian Prince emails use bad grammar and spelling to filter out people with half a brain, they're using the stupid name as a way to filter out folks who won't pay $30/ea to eat garbage in a room that smells like a dirty rag.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Imagine if there was a place that served shit for food. But then, blend in a bit of cumin, some smoked paprika, chile powder, and corn in with the shit.

Thats a chiles.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

OK, so what's Chili's?

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 6 hours ago

I haven't been in a Chili's in forever, and I don't expect to go again. So I'm going to avoid everything from Brinker International [NYSE: EAT] now (Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy), and I'm thinking that I might sell some of it short too.

[-] hopesdead@startrek.website 4 points 5 hours ago

But banning a fictional television character is okay?

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

Chili's has no values, like any other corporate food slop provider. If people would pay, they'd use actual babies in the ribs.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
309 points (100.0% liked)

News

36480 readers
2627 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS