85
submitted 8 hours ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

"Your dad died ~~defending his town and family from invaders~~ killing kids in thrid world countries under the orders of a corrupt pedophilic administration to expand the imperalism of a settler-colonial superamacist gnocidal aparthied."

i mean... he was a nazi.

[-] zipfile1782@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

Is it war or special military operation?

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I didn't see the head of the Department of Special operations, but the head of the Department of War was there... Talking about Jesus.

[-] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 hours ago

Unfortunately for them, Trump likes soldiers who didn’t get killed in war.

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

So much of what he does is so intentionally manufactured - very odd intentions and ideas about what to manufacture, just to say that briefly - that I have to believe he thought it would land well, advantageously in his permanently self-aggrandizing way - the several times he's said this and similar stuff.

Which, after a little inspection, gives us such a weird tiny window both into what he thinks impresses people...but to a vaguer degree, by proxy, what does impress the people who he historically has always sucked up to.

This specific weird brag he did always stuck out to me as uniquely vile, at first I saw it as merely stupid and amazingly tone deaf (first very surprising campaign, IIRC), but there was something else there I couldn't quite put my finger on, and it's this. I think we have to acknowledge it's always revealed something much, much worse.

How many times have we heard the ways "they" all truly feel, and recoiled at the base lowness of it, projected uniquely, confidently, smugly - out of their grotesque messiah's mouth? He's not uniquely vile. He's uniquely vocal, about it, and that's all.


[Edit: "they", just above, of course means the terminally deranged, unsalvageable minds we call "elites", it doesn't mean Republicans, voters, any other groups of humans - hope that's obvious but I prefer clarity]

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 4 hours ago

I see this as no different than the bastard lobbing a frag grenade at the neighbors and then hiding behind these kids as human shields.

The Mad Child-Raping Wannabe King is killing people's children again, and be doesn't care whose. Never has.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

These kids? My friend, the faces you see are the type of people responsible for KILLING kids. These are all adults with full responsibility for their actions.

[-] exaybachae@startrek.website 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I wonder about the circumstances of their deaths, and the nature of their characters.

It wouldn't surprise me if they were unliked for some reason and intentionally sacrificed.

Heck, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that our king killed them himself for sport then went to war with Iran just to explain their deaths.

[-] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 hours ago

Now CNN, do an article on each of the hundreds of children killed in the air strikes. Highlight how they were the light of the party. How unselfish they were, how they will be missed by their families. How, for some reason, unlike the base these American soldiers were working on, their school didn't have concrete walls around it to protect them.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

And of course there are many more, but these are pathological liars.

[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Disgusting and coward bloodthirsty pigs

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Damn. We lost one of those thumbs from the first spykids movie.

[-] Coyote@piefed.ca 33 points 7 hours ago

A question that's going to be asked more and more: 

Was it worth it? 

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
[-] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 1 hour ago

The more I read about this guy, the less it seems like he knows anything about the Art of the Deal.

[-] rottenmummy@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Of course! Anything to distract from the Epstein files.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm all for redemption and rehabilitating. The "too young to know what they were involved in". The "poverty draft" argument. Etc.

But, all of that relies on those former military or former cops actually realizing what they were a part of and spend the rest of their life speaking out against it and actually working to a restorative justice. If all you do is "feel bad" and have PTSD from killing children.

Unfortunately, when you die being a modern day Nazi, I'm not gonna waste my time thinking or caring about "if" any of those things could have happened. I'm just glad you're dead and not hurting people anymore.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 6 hours ago

More of this please and good riddance.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

4 american terrorists dead

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 hours ago

LoL those Losers and Suckers! Don't be Offended at ME I'm just REPEATING the President!

[-] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 6 points 7 hours ago
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

News

36292 readers
2865 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS