I don't clear Gates for falling in with Epstein, but this dude is clearly the fall guy for the tech sector. From old media to social media.
It wasn't Gates at the front of the inauguration: Meta, Amazon, Google, Twitter. DJT kept all his Epstein stooges close, that's a consistent. These folx also are all mysteriously missing from the Epstein files.
Gates is just the easiest target because Microsoft is the enemy of where The Big 4 want the tech sector to go.
Or maybe it's because Gates is not a CEO anymore?
You are probably right, all of the guys that weren't redacted were done so at the direction of the president, we only found out about the ones that didn't make a deal with him, be it to do him favors like sending money into his secret accounts, his favorite type of favor to receive I suspect; and or not telling people the things they themselves know, or the evidence they have, that can implicate the president and his pals.
That said, fuck them all. Let's nail these fuckers to the wall, then work and razing and burning the rest. This scandal is the key, it's not going away.
What do you mean by
Microsoft is the enemy of where The Big 4 want the tech sector to go
"I never knew the man."
"Okay I knew him but only casually."
"Okay we hung out a bit."
"Okay I spent time on his rape island but didn't partake."
"Okay I had consensual sex with women there."
You are here.
"Okay they were trafficked sex victims and it was rape."
"Okay they were children."
I once blew $1000 over a weekend as a sp4 turned loose on Deutschland. most weekends were boring $50 in food/drink and vhs flicks. maybe see a movie. drunken debauchery can be expensive. can't happen in the states for reasons. easy to see how a bunch of repressed/warped by religion, suit-tie culture, American men can be sucked into compromising situations with mostly sex as the lure. whatever you want, a plane ride away with no accountability. oh the cameras? yeah they're everywhere. surprise! it's like someone watched candid camera and hatched a plan. 'affair', guess that's the suit-tie acceptable phrase
I am honestly tired of seeing the faces of assholes
book tour in 3,2,1 epstein unleashed
Both “affairs” and “women” doing some heavy lifting here.
One of the few Russian works I know is "kompromat".
Normally i would try and be objective but i dont care anymore with these guys
Bill really nearly whitewashed away all the horrible business practices and cutthroat shit he did in the 80s and 90s with the Gates Foundation.
But man, he looks like he aged a shitload in the short while since all the Epstein stuff really came to light.
He is still doing shitty stuff. He bailed out Monsanto with a big investment, and is a big proponent of their herbicides and proprietary round up ready seeds, and owns, what is it 5 or approaching 10% of farmland in the US to use it on.
He's big into geo engineering, trying to get governments to agree to let them spray masses of sulphur dioxide in the upper atmosphere to blot out the sun, totally not a Mr. Burns move. As if he knows the unintended consequences that could result, or as if other countries that would be affected agreed to it, to say nothing of the wildlife, (ie test projects have already shown in the westerh hemisphere it will make africa drier.)
What else, he intervened in covid vaccines to prevent a not for profit open source vaccine. The very idea horrified him somehow. He seems like he's trying to do good sometimes and does evil. He has a case of billionairism where everyone around him agrees with everything he says and he thinks the laser light of knowledge shines out of his ass.
Yeah, never trust billionaires who are all talk about being charitable and yet their net worth hadn't even gone down significantly. They're still billionaires.
I dint believe him one second, most because he was obviously using it to do money laundering, he went on AMA subreddit quite a few times too pre-2020, plus his vaccine push in africa was met with criticism too.i always felt he was quite a slimy person. and it was well known rich people like to do 'philantrophy" in AFRICA to cleanse themselves of guilt, or hate done to POCs.
All this is making Torvalds and FOSS look better.
For anyone that still needs to hear this: there are no good billionaires! ABAB. This dude right here was the poster child for "good billionaires'. I don't know whether only evil fuckers can become billionaires (probably), but I do know that having access to functionally unlimited wealth and power will inevitably warp your soul.
gates was and is one of the most ruthless billionaires, thats why his sudden pivoting to "helping africa" was all but disengenious, but now it made sense since the epstein files came out.
Any good billionaire could donate down to being a hundred-millionaire and live a life of obscene comfort for generations. Why wouldn't you, if you weren't trash?
a billionaire would never give enough away money to make themselves poor, they are too use to that lifestyle. like a millionaire dont want to be 10 or 100 thousandaire.
This dude right here was the poster child for "good billionaire"
Really? I mean he tried really hard to whitewash his image with his charity and malaria research, but he was always a piece of absolute shit and the ‘good billionaire’ label was always a scam: DOS deal games, monopoly behavior, billionaire policy capture through his foundation, education meddling, vaccine-IP politics, nothing he did was truly charity, everything was self serving.
I fully agree with you. I been team "fuck Bill Gates" forever. I just mean that there's a whole lot of people that were jock-riding him.
Yeah the money thing can make good people terrible
Imagine winning the game. But you have decades of your life left. By definition, you have access to the most exclusive of everything. Nobody ever tells you "no". I'm not surprised these fucks decide that even the the most universal social taboos shouldn't confine them.
The phrase "underage women" is the biggest lie mainstream media has pushed as part of all of this. These scumbags didn't have sex with "underage women". The raped children.
i cannot give this sleezbag tax-evading wealth-hoarding genocidal pedo any benifit of doubt because he's a billionare and there are no good billionares.
the first thing a good billionare would do is not become one, and look around the world where their resources could alleviate so much suffering.
He's trying to satisfy people by admitting to a smaller thing rather than the worse things he did. Classic PR.
Soon enough the two Russian women will in fact be two Russian girls.
Slightly better than Spacey suddenly deciding to come out as a proud gay man, but not by much
or saying his job was tied to COVID.
The shit about trying to secretly dose his wife without telling her, what the fuck dude.
without a doctors direction, whatever antibiotics would be ineffective if you arnt dosed properly. and also MEDICATION have added bitterent so you would be able to taste it.
There was an SVU/LAW AN Order episode about similar situation, the guy was "tracking the wife" whom he injected her with some kind of rfid chip without her noticeing while she slept and she got an infeciton from that, and he tried to secretly treat her with antibiotics without her noticing, turns out it dint work, because (you need to be properly told how long and how much to take).
Fuck Bill Gates.
I could just fuck a petri dish and still enjoy a similar bacterial adventure.
don't. he'll drug ya
Announcing "affairs" seems carefully chosen. "Affair" implies an ongoing extramarital relationship. Sampling each of Epstein's new child sex slaves would be pedophilia and cheating, but not affairs. He wants to imply his only extramarital sex was with consenting adults.
Bill Gates fucked kids
Did he try to dose them with anti STD pills?
I’m conflicted in these situations.
Obviously apologizing is better than nothing but at the same time, it’s an empty gesture at this point given how there is no consequence.
The only benefit is that it’s another domino that hopefully leads to actual justice.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.