1521
seriously (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 months ago by not_IO to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

next time I hear "there is just too many (brown) people" i swear

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 158 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, kinda like that time Brian Thompson got shot, and the next day United Healthcare ceased to exist.

Not saying that the general point of corporations doing more harm than people is wrong. Just that if you think that the corporation is just one person, I've got a bridge to sell you.

[-] voidsignal@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago

if that continues to happen, trust me, eventually none of these fuckers will be left in line.

[-] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

United Healthcare's stock is down 60% since the incident. United Healthcares board and new CEOs lowered the rejection rate of patients out of fear as well. Say what you want about the morality of what was done. The efficacy speaks for itself

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago

The efficacy lasted for all of a month before returning to where it had been before.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So, UHC stock was up around 600, dropped to a bit over 200, and is lately around 300. So like ¾ of the drop is still there in linear terms, or something like ⅔ in logarithmic terms.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

That's true, and my bad for implying otherwise.

But I also think much more critically, they're back to denying coverage exactly the way they were before Thompson died.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

I have no knowledge to refute that latter point, and I am inclined to think it is very likely true.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Yup. After 9/11 for a while it seemed every week or two the news would report that "The leader of Al Qaeda" had just been killed or captured. Not a false statement, yet it happened again the next week.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 15 points 3 months ago

The way in which Luigi was arrested is part of their safety checks. A way to motivate working class to turn people in, without paying them. I generally thought reward money worked.

I learned it did not work from a podcast that no longer exists. Michael Bazzel’s OSINT podcast talked about it within the context of people who used OSINT to find people on wanted lists and how reward money collection actually works. (Podcast doesn’t exist any more, the copies of the casts went away with the podcast.). Sadly, there’s no replacement for this type of news and info condensed down into one place. It’s also a niche area of information, not followed by many.

Those McDonald's workers were not paid for turning Luigi in. But they thought they would be.

Even so, look at the bigger picture. How many Luigi’s have there been since 1981?

Most people avoid confrontation, spending most of their days sitting in a chair or lying down, and thinking/hoping/wishing a white knight is going to rescue them from their situation. It’s one reason why so many people exist in bad relationships (1 or a chain of them). Because they think that other person is going to rescue them from their sad days of avoiding confrontation while sitting in a chair or lying down, most of the day for most of their days. Hoping. But never doing. Thinking about doing. Maybe spouting off on the internet about doing. But never doing.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

find people on wanted lists and how reward money collection actually works

How does it actually work?

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Generally? It doesn't.

See making the call to tip off the cops makes you eligible for the reward. If you called the correct tip/reward phone number. So that's the first road block.

Even then, you aren't automatically getting the reward. No. There are still hoops to jump through.

As a note these additional hoops also apply when there isn't a specific phone number.

According to the FBI's website, I'd link but I'm on my phone, someone (an agent, a prosecutor, etc) has to put your name forward in a nomination package.

This is then reviewed by the FBI and other agencies, it's kind of vague.

Anyway these agencies decide if you get a reward and what percentage.

And none of this can start until after a conviction is secured.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

Yeah, kinda like that time Brian Thompson got shot, and the next day United Healthcare ceased to exist.

Their HP definitely went down. And, anecdotally, I heard from a pharmacist friend that they were approving claims like nobody's business for the next day or so

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I said nothing of the sort. But I ask once again: If we execute these 90 people, will that make us stop burning oil? Is it at least a helpful step down the path of stopping to burn oil?

If not, then please just don't act as though these 90 people are all we have to overcome to save the planet.

[-] DirtSona@feddit.org 25 points 3 months ago

Of course something will happen. If the bosses or big corporations would be killed constantly, the next in line would be thinking about changing things. Just remember Luigi.

https://factually.co/fact-checks/health/luigi-mangione-healthcare-accessibility-impact-288343

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] artifex@piefed.social 33 points 3 months ago

I honestly have to wonder at what point people will collectively say "why the hell are we letting them do this" ? Not sure what happens after that, but it seems like it must have to happen at some point, right? Right?

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 17 points 3 months ago

Never underestimate the power of inertia. Some people live their entire lives on it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Still wrong, it's capitalism. Without them, there would be different people in the same position. Hate the game, not the player. Well, hate the game and the player but don't expect change from exchanging the player

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

What's your best, longest-lived example of a society without capitalism? Do you have any?

By capitalism, I mean

"private individuals or companies that own and control businesses and property", the simplest definition of capitalism

[-] hobovision@mander.xyz 15 points 3 months ago

Capitalism was literally invented in the last few hundred years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carotte 6 points 3 months ago

any socialist society will be inherently disadvantaged by the fact that the global hegemon, the USA, is hellbent on destroying them. so, given that, maybe the soviet union? china? they certainly aren't perfect, soviet union especially, but any future socialist project can (and should) learn from their successes and mistakes

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

in the same position

Important to note that those people would be acutely aware of how vulnerable said position is. People act differently when they're reminded of their own mortality.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Tja@programming.dev 24 points 3 months ago

Say the Americans who consume 3x the energy of other developed nations.

"Jeff bezos forced me to live in the desert and run AC 10 months of the year"

"Bill Gates made me drive my car to get groceries"

"Bring back plastic straws"

"Roll coal, baby!"

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I like how the post is about the bus load of rich people that do the most polluting and we started blaming each other. Focus people. Our cars do pollute, but nowhere near as much as a these rich bastards.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

Much more, in fact. I did the math a while ago and just plastic straws cover private jets for about a week. Moving half the US traffic from cars to public transport would do marvels for CO2 levels, more than outright banning private jets.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

To be fair on those:

  • Most people can't afford to move so if you live in the desert then you're stuck in the desert even if the living cost would be lower somewhere else post initial moving cost, doubly so if its the only place near your job.
  • No the car lobby and US city design did.
  • No yeh fuck these people
  • Doubly fuck these people.
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

On one hand, yes, sure, fuck those people, 100%. On the other hand, remember that those people are encouraged and most likely exist only because of disinformation propaganda campaigns designed, promoted and delivered by the same bus load of people. So, you know, perspective.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

Lick those oil exec boots just a little harder and I'm sure they'll send you an invite to the pedo party.

[-] happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

nobody said oil executives are somehow blameless or ok, it's just funny to shift literally all blame away from you

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They literally conspired to make the entire country not only dependent on their products, but did so knowing the harm those products caused to both the people and environment. The majority of the blame rests there and pretending that any amount of "personal responsibility" needs to be addressed is just so fucking stupid and self-defeating that it practically borders on sabotage. Let's get mired in blaming each other for our own minuscule, largely involuntary contribution while they keep filling their pockets with our blood.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Fredthefishlord 15 points 3 months ago

Exactly. People love to pretend they aren't part of the problem as they keep their houses at 70 throughout 100° heat, roll car while driving their cars, and order boat loads of temu junk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NewDark@lemmings.world 22 points 3 months ago

Kind of. It's the system they operate under, capitalism.

Get rid of those specific people and you would have others people take their place.

However, not to say that it isn't worthwhile to also bust out the guillotines

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They'll find new executives, bud. Executives are just the lackeys for shareholders and the board of directors. A new one will grow for each one lost.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Giving up hasn't worked yet.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm just saying the aim isn't the most effective. Shooting someone's foot certainly will hamper someone, but the pain will go away eventually. Gotta aim for a more lethal part of the body

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alejandra@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

It’s a reminder that large problems are often tied to concentrated power. Holding systems accountable while still pushing for collective change is probably the most constructive path forward.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

If only there was like a deck of cards with their faces on it.

[-] stray@pawb.social 16 points 3 months ago

https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/

Sometimes I like to gaze lovingly into their faces while writing their names in my diary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Imagine if we just locked all the doors and firebombed Davos. Could save humanity in one day of work.

edit: for legal reasons I wish to clarify this is a joke

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 13 points 3 months ago

someone needs to mangione them

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 13 points 3 months ago

While killing them would be progress, the real need is a revolution.

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 21 points 3 months ago

100% this, and not an explicitly violent revolution, either. We need to build alternative power structures to replace our heirarchical society. Simply replacing our elites using violence would end up with a new set of elites who are very provably willing to use violence against their enemies. IMO this is one of the major reasons that marxism-leninism has historically yielded authoritarian states, e.g. the USSR.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago

that feels, for some reason, profound.
I mean, sure let it be 200 or 400, 1000. It's still a rounding error compared to all of humanity.

maybe that is why there is a period of prosperity after large wars. The losing side being wiped out reduces that number by half and everyone can breathe a bit more freely.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 months ago

Those people never die in the wars. The reason there are periods of prosperity after wars is because when many young adults have died, labour has more bargaining power.

[-] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

damn. somehow my version, which is pretty dark, is still not that dark.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sepi@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

These few people / companies destroying the planet: BLAME THE CONSUMER!

The amount of fucking everything up they do in a day is more than I do in a lifetime.

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 6 points 3 months ago

Y'all still pay those people money for hamburgers and chicken nuggets you don't need. Eat a nice homemade vegan sandwich and spend the money on a video game. Video games cause a lot less pollution than meat and they're way more fun.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
1521 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11543 readers
3228 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS