784
submitted 1 day ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510

The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker. 

21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.

Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing. 

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public. 

Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.

The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

I want this entire DOJ arrested and the CIA and FBI dismantled and replaced with a transparent agency that is beholden to America and the constitution. Anyone who worked with Mossad should be tried for treason

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Why are they allowed to take stuff down? We need the remaining files still and they’re allowed to take shit down?

[-] Hazor@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

They're allowed because who's going to stop them?

They're not allowed by law - they're allowed simply by being in control of who enforces the law. This kind of government corruption would normally be investigated by the DOJ... Except it's the DOJ doing it, and the only people who might be able to anything about that (the legislature and judiciary) are complicit.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Half of America needs to go to Washington and demand arrests

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

Welcome to fascism. Just couldn't vote for Harris? You did this.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 18 points 23 hours ago

I voted for Harris but you have to be very bad at your job to loose that election.

[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 day ago

The capitalist class did this to us. Blame the people who allowed fascism to rise...which absolutely includes Biden and Harris!

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

The people still voted for trump in greater numbers than Harris. No ifs or buts about that fact. It is the people's responsibility to stay educated and to actually go vote. It's been shown that nations with compulsory voting gain more support for the left. Yes, there is a problem with the Epstein class and capitalism, but that doesn't absolve non-voters and those who voted for fascism from blame.

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 5 points 21 hours ago

It is the people's responsibility to stay educated

It is the media's responsibility to be unbiased and not run propaganda. And yet, Fox News exists.

It is a systemic issue, not a personal one. You can not educate the person who feels they know everything. Someone does not feel like they know everything unless they have that affirmed to them daily. Fox News pushes this shit, daily.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Bro the people that didn't vote for harris ain't here. Not enough of them to realistically blame, anyway.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

But how else do people like this feel superior without having an under class to constantly shit on? By the merit of their own achievements? Hah!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Its mostly people that are too "individualism pilled" to realize that trump and maga are a fabricated phenomena by wealthy individuals who have been given too much power by society.

And realistically its not that people are wholly misinformed, just a mix of optimistic, detached, isolated, and understandably angry.

The vast majority of people didn't foresee what is happening now but its clear the DNC did and saw a lot of acceptable risks in the way they dealt with biden and harris.

I'd call the real issue the "Chuck Schumer worldview"

[-] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Really tired of you pathetic embarassed republicans blaming leftists for the election loss. Leftists overwhelmingly voted for Harris. Your "centrists" hated her.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

But Harris didn’t say she was going to solve all the world’s problems immediately! She wanted to personally murder every single Palestinian person. Or something.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

She had a funny laugh.

But realistically she had a vagina and voters aren't super fond of that. If she'd have been a man, she'd have won. I'll get downvoted and accused of being misogynist but it's voters who are, especially women.

And now she's running again and god help us if the party makes the same mistake in 2028, if we have real elections.

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago

Are we just going to ignore that the DOJ had all of these documents while Biden was president and just twiddled their thumbs apparently?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Like they released the JFK files after JFK was killed? Or how they arrested arrested Reagan for illegally selling arms to Iran to fund death squads in the americas? Idk man there's a long history of presidents just sitting on this kind of shit and Biden is not exactly brave.

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 4 points 22 hours ago

I don’t really disagree. My point is more that if Biden or his AG had actually pursued this with the degree of seriousness it deserves, Trump would likely not be president. People need better options than to vote for a pedophile rapist or someone who let pedophile rapists go free.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I would go on a step further and say, we should remember some norms suck and we should be asking candidates if they will prosecute previous administrations and what for.

Like the norm of not prosecuting presidents is possibly the most destructive and vile norm and has lead exclusively to terrible outcomes, from the contras, to jan 6th, to the Iraq war, to epstein secrecy.

[-] CovertGogurt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

President's used to let the justice department carry out justice as it saw fit. Now it's a legal apparatus for the president to weaponize.

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

What are you talking about? Presidents have directed the DOJ to look into specific crimes and even have created special investigatory tasks forces all the time. Obama did exactly that after 2008 in order to investigate financial fraud. Don’t you think that a child sex trafficking ring involving some of the US’s most rich and powerful people, including former presidents, deserves to be prioritized in the same way?

At the very least Biden is responsible for appointing Merrick Garland of all people. Remember this was after Epstein’s apparent “suicide”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] suddenlyme@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

Trump should never have been on the ticket.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

America still hates women too much for that.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 198 points 1 day ago

Who wrote this shit, "...Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens.." so a teenager or child and not a woman then?

[-] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Depressingly common. “Had sex with an underage woman”. So, raped a child

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 124 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

US media keeps calling the children in the Epstein files women for some reason. It’s been an ongoing theme. German speaking media will occasionally use the German word for minor, but they often also just lazily translate from US sources and use the German word for women/woman.

[-] Hypnotoad_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

"some reason" is actively on purpose to change the public perception

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 77 points 1 day ago

It's called sane washing. The US media is owned by people who are likely in the files too.

[-] Daviino@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Always the same language. Same deal with underaged black versus white kids. One is called a young man, the other a kid. Guess who is who.

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 45 points 1 day ago

Yes. The allegation should be phrased that he beat and raped a child.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

We need to have a simple check in the government and media. Everyone who thinks a 13 year old is a woman please stand on this side of the room. Everyone else please leave the room. Then we drone strike the room with the earthquake bomb.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So the FBI had an interview about the then president sexually assaulting/raping a child and them punching her in the face when it didn't go his way. The interview evidence gets mishandled and instead of taking 5 business days required to file it took 12 business days. The next day the person who connected the President to these charges is found dead. With his brother requesting a secondary otopsy because he believed his brother was murdered, and the review showed they did not believe the death to be suicide. And the footage mysteriously having issues as well. And the people who moved the body had no recollection of removing a noose.

This is nothing but a conspiracy, lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago

mOsT tRanSpaReNt PreSiDeNt EvEr

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 87 points 1 day ago

Despite his efforts it's looking pretty transparent that he raped children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So Jeffrey Epstein is pretty much just another partner or employee Trump threw under the bus. And I'm beginning to think it's more the *latter.

[-] prole 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

100%

Epstein got an unheard of sweetheart deal the first time he was charged, by then Florida AG Alex Acosta.

Alex Acosta would then go on to be rewarded with a major cabinet position in Trump's first term. Labor Secretary. Something he had no real experience with.

Epstein got off very easy so he wouldn't be compelled to talk, and Acosta was rewarded for facilitating it.

Years later, during Trump's first term, his Attorney General Bill Barr would go on to facilitate the murder of Epstein while in prison.

It's all just a massive criminal enterprise. They aren't even bothering to hide it anymore.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

I don't even know what to say about how ham-fisted and just plain dumb this attempt to rewrite history is. What's depressing is that for far too many people, it'll still work.

If we make it through this, history textbooks are going to need to have chapters on what cult-think does to people, and like half of it will be about MAGA.

[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago

You mean like Hitler and Germany?

We already have history textbooks about this..... there's even a pretty popular book that is a great allegory for what's going on. Based sometime in the 1980s I believe.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The internet has given us a nice archive of the thoughts of brainwashing victims that didn't exist in Nazi Germany.

Personally I think Brave New World is a better representation of our dystopia than 1984. People aren't trying to avoid thoughtcrime because they're afraid of a boot to the neck (yet) but are instead lulled into complacency by a "keep your head down" culture and lulled into complicity by a "choose your own truth" media landscape.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Sometimes I wish I could be a believer in religion so that I might have solace that evil people will at least face divine justice in death even if they received no Earthly justice in life. Alas, the depressing truth is that evil coasts through life without facing justice all the time, and the good just as often fall victim to the machinations, crimes, and sadism of the evil and never find any justice, retribution or closure after it. It's one of the reasons that I don't believe unfortunately.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

god help me my dad will huff and puff about biden this and biden that and some made up 'good' shit trump did whenever more trump shit comes out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
784 points (100.0% liked)

News

36000 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS