1043
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 65 points 5 days ago

Wow, thank goodness nobody gutted the authority in charge of making sure that wouldn't happen...

https://www.theverge.com/news/646797/nhtsa-staffers-office-vehicle-automation-safety-firing-doge-tesla

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

The AI companies put out a presser a few years back that said "Um, aktuly, its the humans who are bad drivers" and everyone ate that shit up with a spoon.

So now you've got Waymos blowing through red lights and getting stuck on train tracks, because "fuck you fuck you stop fighting the innovation we're creatively disruptive we do what we want".

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] itsathursday@lemmy.world 154 points 5 days ago

Optical recognition is inferior and this is not surprising.

[-] slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works 77 points 5 days ago

Yeah that's well known by now. However, safety through additional radar sensors costs money and they can't have that.

[-] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 79 points 5 days ago

Nah, that one's on Elon just being a stubborn bitch and thinking he knows better than everybody else (as usual).

[-] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

He's right in that if current AI models were genuinely intelligent in the way humans are then cameras would be enough to achieve at least human level driving skills. The problem of course is that AI models are not nearly at that level yet

[-] T156@lemmy.world 58 points 5 days ago

Even if they were, would it not be better to give the car better senses?

Humans don't have LIDAR because we can't just hook something into a human's brain and have it work. If you can do that with a self-driving car, why cut it down to human senses?

[-] 48954246@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago

Exactly, with this logic why have motors or wheels?

You don't have wheels so you shouldn't use cars

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Also the Human brain is still on par with some of the worlds best supercomputers, I doubt a Tesla has that much onboard processing power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

just one more AI model, please, that’ll do it, just one more, just you wait, have you seen how fast things are improving? Just one more. Common, just one more…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 63 points 5 days ago
[-] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped

Okay, idk why we would blame this one on the self driving car...

a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.

original source

The difference is a lot of these are never reported when it's done by a human driver. I very highly doubt the rate is 4x higher than humans. I'm not saying the self driving cars are good. I am just saying human drivers are really bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Clearly, AI isn't just challenging human performance, it's exceeding it. Four times the crash rate is just the beginning. Just imagine the crash rate when super intelligence comes!

🚘💥🚗

[-] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Got this saved next time someone tells me that a robot can drive better than a human. They almost had me there, but data doesn’t lie. 

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

A robot can theoretically drive better than a human because emotions and boredom don't have to be involved. But we aren't there yet and Teslas are trying to solve the hard mode of pure vision without range finding.

Also, I suspect that the ones we have are set up purely as NNs where everything is determined by the training, which likely means there's some random-ass behaviour for rare edge cases where it "thinks" slamming on the accelerator is as good an option as anything else but since it's a black box no one really understands, there's no way to tell until someone ends up in that position.

The tech still belongs in universities, not on public roads as a commercial product/service. Certainly not by the type of people who would at any point say, "fuck it, good enough, ship it like that", which seems to be most of the tech industry these days.

[-] greygore@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is more specific to Tesla than self driving in general, as Musk decided that additional sensors (like LiDAR and RADAR on other self driving vehicles) are a problem. Publicly he’s said that it’s because of sensor contention - that if the RADAR and cameras disagree, then the car gets confused.

Of course that raises the problem that when the camera or image recognition is wrong, there’s nothing to tell the car otherwise, like the number of Tesla drivers decapitated by trailers that the car didn’t see. Additionally, I assume Teslas have accelerometers so either the self driving model is ignoring potential collisions or it’s still doing sensor fusion.

Not to mention we humans have multiple senses that we use when driving; this is one reason why steering wheels still mostly use mechanical linkages - we can “feel” the road, we can detect when the wheels lose traction, we can feel inertia as we go around a corner too fast. On a related tangent, the Tesla Cybertruck uses steer-by-wire instead of a mechanical linkage.

This is why many (including myself) believe Tesla has a much worse safety record than Waymo. I’ve seen enough drunk and distracted drivers to believe that humans will always drive better than a ~~human~~ robot. Don’t get me wrong, I still have concerns about the technology, but Musk and Tesla has a history of ignoring safety concerns - see the number of deaths related to his desire to have non-mechanical handles and hide the mechanical backup.

[-] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

humans will always drive better than a human

Typo, or what did you mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Other robots might be able to, but I wouldn’t trust a Tesla RoboTaxi get me safely across a single street.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

It's important to draw the line between what Tesla is trying to do and what Waymo is actually doing. Tesla has a 4x higher rate, but Waymo has a lower rate.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago

Not just lower, a tiny fraction of the human rate of accidents:

https://waymo.com/safety/impact/

Also, AFAIK this includes cases when the Waymo car isn't even slightly at fault. Like, there have been 2 deaths involving a Waymo car. In one case a motorcyclist hit the car from behind, flipped over it, then was hit by another car and killed. In the other case, ironically, the real car at fault was a Tesla being driven by a human who claims he experienced "sudden unintended acceleration". It was driving at 98 miles per hour in downtown SF and hit a bunch of stopped cars at a red light, then spun into oncoming traffic and killed a man and his dog who were in another car.

Whether or not self-driving cars are a good thing is up for debate. But, it must suck to work at Waymo and to be making safety a major focus, only to have Tesla ruin the market by making people associate self-driving cars with major safety issues.

[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

Not just lower, a tiny fraction of the human rate of accidents:

https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/state-by-state

Well, no. Lets talk fatality rate. According to linked data, human drivers

1.26 deaths per 100 million miles traveled

Vs Waymo 2 deaths per 127 million miles :)

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

Well, Waymo's really at 0 deaths per 127 million miles.

The 2 deaths are deaths that happened were near Waymo cars in a collision involving the Waymo car. Not only did the Waymo not cause the accidents, they weren't even involved in the fatal part of either event. In one case a motorcyclist was hit by another car, and in the other one a Tesla crashed into a second car after it had hit the Waymo (and a bunch of other cars).

The IIHS number takes the total number of deaths in a year, and divides it by the total distance driven in that year. It includes all vehicles, and all deaths. If you wanted the denominator to be "total distance driven by brand X in the year", you wouldn't keep the numerator as "all deaths" because that wouldn't make sense, and "all deaths that happened in a collision where brand X was involved as part of the collision" would be of limited usefulness. If you're after the safety of the passenger compartment you'd want "all deaths for occupants / drivers of a brand X vehicle" and if you were after the safety of the car to all road users you'd want something like "all deaths where the driver of a brand X vehicle was determined to be at fault".

The IIHS does have statistics for driver death rates by make and model, but they use "per million registered vehicle years", so you can't directly compare with Waymo:

https://www.iihs.org/ratings/driver-death-rates-by-make-and-model

Also, in Waymo it would never be the driver who died, it would be other vehicle occupants, so I don't know if that data is tracked for other vehicle models.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Isn't Waymo rate better because they are very particular where they operate? When they are asked to operate in sligthly less than perfect conditions it immediately goes downhill https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385936888_Identifying_Research_Gaps_through_Self-Driving_Car_Data_Analysis (page 7, Uncertainty)

Edit: googled it a bit, and apparently Waymo mostly drives in

Waymo vehicles primarily drive on urban streets with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or less

Teslas do not.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 5 days ago

They'll work perfectly as soon as AI space data center robots go to Mars. I'd say a Robovan will be able to tow a roadster from New York to Hong Kong by... probably July. July or November at the latest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago

Use lidar you ketamine saturated motherfucker

[-] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

But then he would have to admit being wrong for removing radar...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago
[-] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

Only 4x? Wao, they're way better than I expected then.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's Austin. The traffic is so shitty you can't go fast enough to get in a wreck most of the time.

I live in the area, and can confirm anecdotally that the Teslas are bad drivers and the Waymos generally are excellent.

[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

I do (sarcastically) love knowing Leave the World Behind is a documentary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Rogan: so eaaauhm, yeah that’s definitely a thing huh? But you know all progress must go uphill without breaking a few eggs…right?

Musk: makes that stupid nazi face where he’s smoking weed So we’re going to make Grok a subscription model that watches you sleep in your car as we plug you into the bio battery of your Tesla. Then your mind gets used to train AI models as you’re driving. But you know, I’m expecting that to work last month, give or take a year or 10.

Rogan: Pluggin in huh? How’s that work?

Musk: Either a port in the back of your arm or an arm up your back, not sure yet.

Rogan: Wow, … so anyway wanna do some dmt?

We can plug it in if you want.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 24 points 5 days ago
[-] spacebread98@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

I thought ai was going to replace all jobs in a year and a half

[-] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Even for the first piss poor epigone of Neuromancer, the name "Robotaxi" would've been laughed at.

Mulon Esk made the dumbest name happen for the xth time.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Hopefully, the French judicial system will throw his worthless pedo neo-Nazi ass into prison.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped

Uuh...wouldn't that be the fault of the bus? I mean, the system is faulty as fuck so there's really no need to mix in shit like this, it reduces legitimacy of the otherwise very valid criticism.

[-] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

That depends entirely where the Tesla stopped, and under what conditions.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
1043 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

81709 readers
3018 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS