814
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] neuracnu 76 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The left wants to squeeze the rich until money comes out. Centrist republicans don't.

That's why those controlling the Democratic party will not save us. The left needs to take it from them.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

The pneumatic press is this century's guillotine.

[-] inlandempire@jlai.lu 49 points 2 weeks ago
[-] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 weeks ago

Crazy how Lemmy is still small enough to have famous/infamous commenters. I wonder if I have a rep? I feel like I comment a lot but probably nothing compared to them

[-] inlandempire@jlai.lu 5 points 2 weeks ago

Well now I'm gonna remember you 🧐

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Is that shithead still around? I thought he might have died

[-] hector@lemmy.today 10 points 2 weeks ago

I got into it with him just a few days back, don't recall what it was over. I'm not a fan.

[-] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 weeks ago

Democrats should have promised to tax the rich and use that money to build a new Third Reich to appease both sides 🙄

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Alternatively force women to have abortions and appease both sides.

[-] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Fascism it is I guess. I wish things could be different, but the liberals didn't want to compromise. Oh well.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

Well no. Compromising with the left risks communism. Letting the right get everything they want; that's just fine.

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

It’s accurate for sure.

Democrats made a failed attempt to acquire a potentially valuable resource to their cause, Americans who vote consistently.

People who don’t vote or donate to their party are literally worthless in their eyes.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

I vote consistently because I don't want fascism running the government. They take consistent voters for granted. They should court the disenfranchised with progressive policies but that runs counter to their donor handlers' goals so they pander to the right more and more instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

People who don’t vote or donate BIG MONEY to their party are literally worthless in their eyes.

Ftfy

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

I wish the Democrats had the balls to use that messaging. Instead, it's us leftists trying to convince the radical centrists like Cassandra of Troy.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not so much anymore. It's pretty clear this is what they want.

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

The moment they capitulated and caved on the shutdown, all to save themselves and their rich friend's the horror of losing money over the holidays or being unable to fly to some exotic place on the same runways they refuse to pay taxes to fund, the Democrats proved what everyone already knew. They're controlled opposition. They'll fight with everything they have to prevent a progressive candidate from getting anywhere near the system while allowing fascism to kick down the door with lip-service opposition.

Before Biden, the performance was believable, or at least palatable. After allowing tRump to skirt consequences for January 6, and even allowing him to be on the ballot at all, it was clear there was no intention of meaningful opposition or change. Until and unless we can remove these legislative dinosaurs and get progressives or working people into positions of power, no change will happen. I fear that with the wealth inequalities and immense power wielded by a few, it may have become too late to contain this beast. Nothing can save this system.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

before biden

You weren't around for 2000 then?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

If we could get our own candidates we could take half of the non partisan right voters. Most of them just vote to reject the democrats not endorse the republicans, and are low information. A true populist would take their loyalties, especially now with the America First crowd rejected and scorned by the party. It's supposed champion being led around by the party starting a dozen wars at a time.

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

I completely agree. Zohran is a great example - everyone loves him, even Trump. That's what a principled and charismatic leftist politician looks like. I wish we had more people like Zohran coming into leadership positions in the Democratic party.

Unfortunately, some people are using bad strategies to try and get more Zohrans. Instead of showing up before the primaries and promoting leftist politicians in competition with moderates, they show up after the primaries and attack moderate politicians in competition with fascists. The former is how you get leftists in power. The latter is how you get fascists in power. The two look the same to those who are... less politically adept. But in truth, they have very different effects.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

At the same time, republican orientated influence operations are out there yelling and screaming at people trying to get actual populists in the democratic primaries, or during the anointment process in 2024. Influencing the sheep, and wasting and frustrating the left, to help keep a candidate they can beat to run against them. The oligarchy obviously wanting also to keep their license from being revoked, fearing mild reform more than putting an absolute leader in charge, arrogantly thinking they can control the monster they've reared on the right.

You are going around blaming those that didn't pretend the democrats were doing a good job; and were going to win; and that they would do what is needed after they won, rather than those that saddled us with the doomed to fail, constitutionally unwilling to do what is needed candidate. By the time they get their hack "moderate" coronated, we already lost. There was no situation whereby the democrats would continually win elections selling out more every term and spiting their left base indefinitely while being unpopular and not reforming and not enforcing the law against republicans openly working to fix elections.

Biden didn't even protect the voting officials from death threats. There was zero chance him or his hand picked replacement were going to stop fascists. Once Kamala got in, it was over. I knew it, you should've known it. Which is not saying how I did or didn't vote so don't give me the typical emotional accusations without evidence of voting to force the person on the defensive. The question is that the republic is doomed the moment we get these democrats as candidates.

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I recently played a very fun game of Diplomacy, which is an old board game about international politics. I was playing as Italy, and it was in My interest to keep both Turkey and Russia as weak as possible while I repelled a French invasion, so that once France was no longer a threat, I could conquer both. So what I did is, I formed alliances with both Turkey and Russia, who were new players, and rather than commit troops to aid either side, I gave them both advice on how to outmaneuver the other. If either of them looked about to win, I would give the other one better advice. It worked great, and the Sultan of Turkey was shocked at My betrayal, since I'd helped him so much. He didn't realise I was playing both sides.

republican orientated influence operations are out there yelling and screaming at people trying to get actual populists in the democratic primaries, or during the anointment process in 2024

I hadn't heard that before, but I'm willing to believe it. I also believe that right wing botfarms are promoting fringe left wing movements that attack the Democrats, like Jill Stein's Greens. I think they're playing both sides, helping amplify the most stalemate-y versions of both our arguments, to keep the American Left opposed to the Democrats.

I'm a bit smarter and more experienced than the Turkish Sultan in My diplomacy game. I know who the biggest threat is. The Republicans in the real world are the Italy of My game. The biggest threat. I, as an anarcho-communist, are willing to stand by the Democrats, help them beat Trump, and stab them in the back right afterwards with a communist revolution. But yelling from the rooftops about how much I hate them, while Trump is still in power, is not part of that plan. My plan involves subtlety.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

I was saying that the right aligned influence operations pretend to be democrats and help get the moderates the nominations because they can beat them to be clear your quote makes it sound like I said the opposite.

My point though, by the time it gets to the general election, it's already over. There is zero percent chance of stopping the fascists with them running the opposition. Moreover people that stick their necks out for democracy get them chopped off even if the democrats win an election in spite of themselves, as Biden squeaked out a win against a president with 40 percent approval hated more than any man in the country by half the population.

As such, it's not the fault of those that didn't vote democratic, it would change nothing, fascists were going to win the moment they got establishment candidates in there.

Beyond that, whose fault is it people voted third party? Those establishment figures do nothing but spite the left. People made clear they won't vote for democrats if they get continually worse, if they continue to betray issues we care about, and they openly spite us at every turn. We knew they wouldn't get those votes if they continued to be sold out hacks, and they did it anyway, knowing what the republicans were, and what the electorate was.

As such, it's wrong-headed to blame voters. Keeping a doomed to fail strategy despite knowing it can't win negates any criticism they have of voters for not betraying their own interests and supporting candidates owned by the rich that openly spite them worse every cycle. They made clear they won't support them if they do x or don't do y, and they did x and didn't do y. If they got the support anyway, they would continue to get worse, already further right, further sold out to big money, than George HW Bush let alone Nixon. Biden really was giving George W Bush a run for his money.

It is wrongheaded to blame voters, and belies being susceptible to the buck passing arguments the establishment uses to stay in power to fail again. Don't fall for it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 13 points 2 weeks ago

Democrats have been moving to the right with their program like someone paid them to chase republicans on that stage

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I get it's upsetting but there are just objectively way more republicans than there are leftists in the US. So there is logic here.

Also, vote switchers count for double. So there would actually need to be twice as many possible voters on the left for it to be as appealing as the right.

As always the proper solution is to alter the conditions that incentivize this behavior.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 60 points 2 weeks ago

Yet time and time again, polling shows that Americans prefer leftist policies when presented with them independently of party affiliation. As well as younger generations trending further left.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Right, but they aren't presented them independently of party affiliation. They're told "those scary communists have good policies but they want to destroy America!" And most people believe that.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

So, wait, if the policies are popular, but the party affiliation isn't, how the fuck is the go-to strategy to keep the party but give up on the policies instead of the other way around?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Right, but they aren’t presented them independently of party affiliation.

The last candidate who ran on leftist policies was Biden. He won. Of course, he was lying his wrinkly ass off when he did, but he won running on leftist policies.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

time and time again, polling shows that Americans prefer leftist policies when presented with them independently of party affiliation

So where are all the leftist voters then?

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Right on the table where democrats keep leaving them.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

Winning a lot of elections that way?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

A progressive just won in Fort Worth. In a special election. You know, those things that usually only draw fox-addled octogenarians to the polls.

The "progressives can't win so we have to make sure to hamstring them all the time" shit is just another centrist lie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I get it’s upsetting but there are just objectively way more republicans than there are leftists in the US.

I get that you don't want to hear this because it gets in the way of moving to the right, but republicans won't vote for republican lite when they have full fat fascist.

All you're doing is capitulating for no reason. Well, except that you want to.

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago

There are not more republicans. What there are are checked out non voters and a “left” that had so much splintered infighting no one really knows what the left is.

There is also a swath of single issue voters who vote on guns. They actually would flip in a heartbeat with a liberal gun owner platform. It’s not a new phenomenon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rajano@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

We need nationwide Ranked Choice Voting because I agree that many Democrats are far from perfect and, in an ideal world, I would love to vote for a third party or independent candidate, the reality is that; unless you happen to live in a state with Ranked Choice Voting (Maine, for example) you might indirectly be helping a Republican win. As imperfect as many Democrats are, they are usually far better and usually more sane than the Republicans.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

They support genocide. That's not "imperfect," it's reprehensible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's almost as if they are aware of the actual demographics, and pander accordingly.

There are no real leftists in the US, so I'm not sure why people are still so confused when the DNC doesn't pander to them.

Especially since they already don't fucking vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
814 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

2130 readers
4 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS