1121
Union dues (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kerrigan778 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My union dues are about 800 a year, we'd be lucky to make only 10,000 less a year without the union, and have way less protections. Joining a union is one of the best investments you can make.

[-] Otakulad@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

Remember, if your company is telling you how great something is, it is great for them, not you.

[-] Overconfidentiality 9 points 1 day ago

Right, if you ever see an poster or video anywhere, consider that the message was something someone felt was worth spending money on. And if it was a business, why would a business spend money unless it could somehow benefit its bottom line?

[-] hateisreality@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

Haha my Union Dues... 240/yr.

Pay in the five years before the union....no increase. 20 years of union, pay up 100%.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 215 points 2 days ago

These posters should be illegal.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 25 points 2 days ago

In a lot of countries it would be illegal.

In a lot of countries the unions became powerful enough to be governments, and implemented anti-union busting laws.

For some reason the United States seems to have skipped a bunch of the social development that went on in other countries. Unfortunately this is probably because of the American psyche and their obsession with the idea that rags to riches is possible, despite all the evidence. So nobody wants to limit their own potential wealth by giving away money to the workers, just in case one day they become the wealthy. The end result is that a bunch of people have to work for Amazon.

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

I’ve seen several from this campaign and they’re so dumb I feel like someone was maliciously compliant in making these so that Delta’s opposition to the union would actually encourage more people to vote to join. Like, management came to someone in marketing, but that person actually wanted to support the union effort.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago
[-] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Utterly hellish. In the UK, which is very far from being a Utopia, this would be almost unthinkable. Real Black Mirror stuff. Sure, the companies may not want you to join the union, but to actively advertise against it is breathtakingly shitty.

[-] Sharlot@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Classic misdirection: compare dues to a toy instead of the extra pay, healthcare, and protections.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

This is why corporate America wants our population uneducated and tuned out and hooked on AI slop and distractions.

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago

It should be illegal to put up stuff like this.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it should not in the "it would be nice" sense, but in the "it's mental that it isn't" sense.

[-] PetulantBandicoot@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Union fees are also 100% tax deductible in Australia, so it's all a win-win.

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 37 points 2 days ago

Scumbags. What the hell is this 'murkin propaganda? It's like the whole country is unironically trying to become the Sith.

[-] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

There are always two. The sith and the vice sith. They also now have the palantir for some reason

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iridebikes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Delta knows their audience. Many pilots lean Republican and see themselves as rugged individualists that have made their own path. Meanwhile, the only reason they're flying in many cases are socially funded training programs. Many from the military.

[-] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 69 points 2 days ago

I guess Delta thinks their employees are complete fucking morons.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Well, most of them are Americans...

/flame, I jest

[-] hungryphrog 25 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago

That’s like one month of US health insurance next year. Way more than worth it over being at the whims of some fuckhead corporation

[-] bamboo 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bebabalula@feddit.dk 34 points 2 days ago

Two questions:

  1. Is this for real?
  2. Does it work?

I feel like a large company going to that kind of effort to explicitly tell me to not spend money on something would have the exact opposite effect. It’s not like they’re saying “unions are bad, actually” it just like “this thing you were going to spend money on, maybe don’t?”

Imagine a poster saying “Drugs are really expensive - you’ll get more value for money if you buy videogames” - would that work?

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's not a perfect analogy because video games are better while on drugs

[-] prole 4 points 1 day ago

The constant anti-union propaganda has definitely worked in the US

[-] JelleWho@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago

It cost them 700, not you. You will gain from an Union

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 33 points 2 days ago

It costs you 700 now and it costs them an unknown amount in the future. They just don't like it because they suspect it'll be quite a lot more than the 700 that you're paying to join. They're right too.

But union dues are annoying in the moment, because when it happens all you see is a reduction in your pay and initially no change in working conditions. That's why they have posters like that up, because even though intellectually people understand that being in a union will long-term result in better pay, in the short term it does effectively result in a temporary pay cut, which can be hard if you're already not really very well paid.

If you're joining an established union sometimes they will be smart and not charge members until they've renegotiated their salaries. But that only happens if you're joining a already formed union.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lots of jobs that need unions are jobs that people don't want to be working in a few years, because they're terrible jobs with minimal benefits and shit pay. Those people can't see that the reason the job is so shitty is because there isn't a union. There's a good chance that they'd actually want to stay with the job once the union transforms the working conditions and compensation.

Lots of people would be satisfied with a career in a "lesser" job like retail if the job didn't suck. There's nothing wrong with being a cashier, cook, custodian, phone attendant, etc for your whole working life if that's what you want to do, and we should compensate people in those jobs accordingly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] walden@wetshav.ing 7 points 1 day ago

This is a meme community, so it's time to get serious!

This happened around 6 or 7 years ago. The company in question only has two work groups that are unionized -- Pilots and Dispatchers. Mechanics, Flight Attendants, Ground Service, etc. are not unionized.

Flight Attendants have attempted to unionize many times, but the vote always fails.

The poster included in this post was for Ramp workers -- the people who load baggage, marshal the planes into the gate, fill the potable water, etc. That vote ultimately failed, but these posters were only a small reason why. In my opinion, the biggest reason that other work groups don't want to unionize (they absolutely can, nothing is stopping them) is profit sharing.

Years ago the pilot union negotiated an extremely excellent profit sharing agreement, and it was negotiated for pilots only. Depending on the amount of profit for the year, employees can expect 10%-%20 of their yearly income paid in a lump sum. The company in question is typically very profitable (I can already see the "profit should be illegal" type of comments coming, but please spare me. I'm just trying to explain how it works).

Over time, other work groups started to catch wind of how much profit sharing pilots were getting. Naturally this sparked talk of unionizing in other work groups, so in order to calm things down the company extended the same profit sharing to all workers, not just the pilots.

This sort of reversed the desire to unionize for a lot of people (I disagree with them, but this is their thinking)... Now if the ramp personnel do unionize, they'd have to negotiate their own profit sharing as they would be excluded from the company wide payout. That's not to say they couldn't negotiate to keep the profit sharing, but the fear is real and people don't want to lose the big fat checks that come almost every year.

In summary, the workers aren't unionized but the company pays a lot of money to them to keep it that way. Would they be better off long term if they unionized? Yes, of course. But this poster, as ridiculous as it is, is not the only reason that work groups aren't voting in unions.

Here's a link to the AFA page talking about it a little bit https://deltaafa.org/news/profit-sharing-2025

[-] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Its crazy to me how short term so many people think.

I mean basic logic dictates that the companies clearly know the union is the better option for you and worse option for them when they're willing to give up concessions, and it should be similarly obvious that inherently, the concessions will never be equivalent to what you are losing in increased wages and protections from if you had made a union.

[-] walden@wetshav.ing 6 points 1 day ago

There's also no accountability for companies and it has been like that for way too long. Look at Starbucks... some stores unionized so they just closed the stores and fired everyone. Completely illegal, but no consequences for the company. They succeeded in scaring the rest of the baristas, though, so mission accomplished.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The union workforce in the USA is about 10% (6% Public and 4% Private?) WTF AmeriKa!?!?

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 22 points 2 days ago

When I worked at Best buy over 10 years ago they had the exact same propaganda. You know instead of union dues you could buy an Xbox! (From us no less!)

...okay I added that last bit but it was implied

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Wages can be exchanged for goods and services.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 days ago

It’s a complicated concept but higher wages means you make more money.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 2 days ago

Many years ago I had to explain to a coworker how progressive taxation works. He was like "that's a great idea! We should do that! It's stupid that now your pay goes up but you take home less because you get taxed more"

I had to tell him, yes it is a good idea. It's how it works now. You don't get more pay and suddenly your whole income is taxed more.

He'd had no idea

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I had an outright argument with one of my own coworkers about this very subject less than six months ago. Even with all of the insane bullshit going on outside today people still just refuse to look up and read any sort of information for themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

In Australia, Union fees are tax deductible.

They don't cost you anything in the end.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Thats not how tax deductions work.

That just means you’re not paying taxes on the income. It’s not like you get the entire $700 back in taxes, because your tax rate probably isn’t 100%. If you pay 30% in taxes, (no clue what you actually pay), writing off the $700 would simply mean you pay $210 less on your taxes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Saarth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

With all the layoffs right now, it's a great opportunity for unions to make people aware about them and how they can be beneficial.

I wish unions were more active on LinkedIn, so that we could like and share their posts. Recent layoffs at Omnicom/IPG have led to people discussing unions in the advertising subreddit..

[-] tym@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

AI Agents don't form unions and THATS why the dems are toothless. AI is the solution to the biggest thorn in their greedy sides

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
1121 points (100.0% liked)

memes

18432 readers
1780 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS