People did notice it wasnt AI. It was good.
It's clearly not AI because it doesn't have weird uncanny and wonky shit. Also the text on the monitor is readable even though it's blurry
Ai image generators can pretty reliably do text now
Not at that scale, they can do larger text fine but at a certain size it just breaks down
However, it is cool that she recreated that AI look to trick them.
It's way less recognizable as an AI "art" style to me tbh. Maybe the studio ghibli one? But I haven't really seen art from that one and it even sounds like a stretch
it does look like that AI version of Ghibli. not like Ghibli directly
How dare you cheat and submit human-generated content to an honest AI competition? Entrants spent literally minutes crafting and refining prompts.
spoiler
/S
That is such a cute picture
I hope people keep doing this. It's a few times now lol. Fuck Ai.
this is like a 2 year old meme at this point. Please don't strip out the date when you take a screenshot of social media.
"strip out" implies it was there at all in the first place. I don't know how you include an absolute date in a screenshot when no absolute date is actually displayed. I guess maybe hover over the relative time and hope that whatever OS or screenshot utility being used doesn't cause a tooltip to disappear
fair enough; I don't use proprietary sm anyway so I don't know what's common there.
it's just one of so many things about software and websites in the past 5 years or so, everything must always be a relative date, with finding absolute dates and times being way more of a pain in the ass than it should be.
tiny but noticeable bit of enshittification :<
When was your comment made? I didn't strip out any information.

3 hours ago of course.
Which means you replied to a comment 10 hours before it was posted.
I have seen it for the first time
edit: but I think the drawing looks like shit so go on
Is this the reverse Turing test? It can be used to gauge if hominid hype followers can "really" think...
So, was it the first time you found out that you were AI? Or did you suspect beforehand?
Wow is it almost to the point humans can make art that looks real?
Of course a hand drawn image by someone who can draw well is better - the artist practiced for years and took hours to draw this. On the other hand whoever took second place used a few minutes and had no training to produce something that was probably quite nice, too.
It's this 'everybody can produce art in seconds' that is both good and bad. On the one hand I like how I can get a image of whatever I want for pennies, on the other hand I can understand how artist fear devaluation of their art.
Unpopular opinion here, but I feel like AI "art" will make my art the handmade furniture of art. AI art will forever be seen as cheap and my stuff, even if crappy, will be appreciated because a real person made it.
Lots of revenue streams to be lost along the way though. Mostly corporate and marketing ones, I reckon.
Alfredo Inshtine over here.
I fucking love cats so much!!!!
so their art is so bad it was mistaken for ai? weird flex but ok.
More like, "This is the only one that doesn't look like shit."
more like "ooble gooble mordi bordi"
Well yeah, if you put it that way...
Another win for ricky.
Good point.
It won an AI art competition... because all the actual AI art was shit
I thought it was a pretty bizarre idea, to submit real art to a garbage fake art contest. And then post about it like it makes an obvious point or something. Not sure why they did that or what they think it means that they won
Edit: I take it the downvoters don't understand it either.
i mean, if the contest has a prize it'd be some easy money and practice. nobody wants to be a starving artist
I guess that's true. I just wouldn't want the stank of AI on my work
Human art, even when claimed to be AI, conveys emotion and connects with people through it. Generative images lack the expression of emotion, and so they are found lacking connection when compared to art from a human of even moderate skill.
I managed to coax some remarkable (to me) artwork from some of the free generators. Got bored real quick though.
Please don't call it "artwork" because it's not art nor work, call it "image"
People Twitter
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.