1046
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 151 points 1 month ago

People did notice it wasnt AI. It was good.

It's clearly not AI because it doesn't have weird uncanny and wonky shit. Also the text on the monitor is readable even though it's blurry

[-] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago

Ai image generators can pretty reliably do text now

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

Not at that scale, they can do larger text fine but at a certain size it just breaks down

However, it is cool that she recreated that AI look to trick them.

[-] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It's way less recognizable as an AI "art" style to me tbh. Maybe the studio ghibli one? But I haven't really seen art from that one and it even sounds like a stretch

it does look like that AI version of Ghibli. not like Ghibli directly

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 month ago

How dare you cheat and submit human-generated content to an honest AI competition? Entrants spent literally minutes crafting and refining prompts.

spoiler/S

[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@piefed.social 53 points 1 month ago

That is such a cute picture

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago

I hope people keep doing this. It's a few times now lol. Fuck Ai.

[-] jaselle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

this is like a 2 year old meme at this point. Please don't strip out the date when you take a screenshot of social media.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 12 points 1 month ago

"strip out" implies it was there at all in the first place. I don't know how you include an absolute date in a screenshot when no absolute date is actually displayed. I guess maybe hover over the relative time and hope that whatever OS or screenshot utility being used doesn't cause a tooltip to disappear

[-] jaselle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

fair enough; I don't use proprietary sm anyway so I don't know what's common there.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

it's just one of so many things about software and websites in the past 5 years or so, everything must always be a relative date, with finding absolute dates and times being way more of a pain in the ass than it should be.

tiny but noticeable bit of enshittification :<

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago

When was your comment made? I didn't strip out any information.

[-] zerofk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

3 hours ago of course.

Which means you replied to a comment 10 hours before it was posted.

[-] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have seen it for the first time

edit: but I think the drawing looks like shit so go on

[-] marcela 11 points 1 month ago

Is this the reverse Turing test? It can be used to gauge if hominid hype followers can "really" think...

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

So, was it the first time you found out that you were AI? Or did you suspect beforehand?

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wow is it almost to the point humans can make art that looks real?

[-] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Of course a hand drawn image by someone who can draw well is better - the artist practiced for years and took hours to draw this. On the other hand whoever took second place used a few minutes and had no training to produce something that was probably quite nice, too.

It's this 'everybody can produce art in seconds' that is both good and bad. On the one hand I like how I can get a image of whatever I want for pennies, on the other hand I can understand how artist fear devaluation of their art.

[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unpopular opinion here, but I feel like AI "art" will make my art the handmade furniture of art. AI art will forever be seen as cheap and my stuff, even if crappy, will be appreciated because a real person made it.

Lots of revenue streams to be lost along the way though. Mostly corporate and marketing ones, I reckon.

[-] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 8 points 1 month ago

Alfredo Inshtine over here.

[-] wilfim@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I fucking love cats so much!!!!

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 month ago

so their art is so bad it was mistaken for ai? weird flex but ok.

[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 60 points 1 month ago

More like, "This is the only one that doesn't look like shit."

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 8 points 1 month ago

more like "ooble gooble mordi bordi"

[-] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Well yeah, if you put it that way...

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 month ago

Another win for ricky.

[-] RabbleRebel@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 month ago

Good point.

[-] awful_neutral 4 points 1 month ago

It won an AI art competition... because all the actual AI art was shit

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought it was a pretty bizarre idea, to submit real art to a garbage fake art contest. And then post about it like it makes an obvious point or something. Not sure why they did that or what they think it means that they won

Edit: I take it the downvoters don't understand it either.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i mean, if the contest has a prize it'd be some easy money and practice. nobody wants to be a starving artist

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I guess that's true. I just wouldn't want the stank of AI on my work

[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Human art, even when claimed to be AI, conveys emotion and connects with people through it. Generative images lack the expression of emotion, and so they are found lacking connection when compared to art from a human of even moderate skill.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I managed to coax some remarkable (to me) artwork from some of the free generators. Got bored real quick though.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago

Please don't call it "artwork" because it's not art nor work, call it "image"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
1046 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8715 readers
803 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS