1046
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought it was a pretty bizarre idea, to submit real art to a garbage fake art contest. And then post about it like it makes an obvious point or something. Not sure why they did that or what they think it means that they won

Edit: I take it the downvoters don't understand it either.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i mean, if the contest has a prize it'd be some easy money and practice. nobody wants to be a starving artist

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I guess that's true. I just wouldn't want the stank of AI on my work

[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Human art, even when claimed to be AI, conveys emotion and connects with people through it. Generative images lack the expression of emotion, and so they are found lacking connection when compared to art from a human of even moderate skill.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
1046 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8715 readers
431 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS