[-] marcela 4 points 15 hours ago

a group of trans women

The collective noun for several trans women is a "triumph". A triumph of trans women.

[-] marcela 7 points 4 days ago

I mean yeah, these people laugh at the notion of NSFW.

[-] marcela 2 points 4 days ago

Let me highlight some bits of your message:

I clearly have attitudes that being trans is monstrous

Exposure therapy has been helpful, and my overall distress from trans people is much less now than it was at the start.

But surgeries do not resolve trauma and setbacks formed through years of closetedness, dysphoria, and denial.

I am beginning to feel like this is one of the biggest sources of my continued distress - it's not just that I am trans, it's that I lived so long as a man and what that did to me (physically yes, but mentally is what I mean).

But I have get across other people who like you have gone through surgeries to find something to be desired at the other end.

I do think this is the right take-away, the fact that neovaginas are lined with skin that will never be like or function like a natal vagina is a technicality - the bottom line is that vaginoplasty has excellent outcomes and are totally worth it. (Even if it's not quite as good as you mentioned.)

Let me start by that last part. I meant that a bit differently. I meant that I have met people who have undergone SRS and then they want to be done with gender dysphoria and the trans label. A person might develop dysphoria later in life about a facial feature for instance, but fails to realize it is dysphoria, because she is "done" with surgeries, and done with "being trans". This is related to the misconception that HRT and SRS eventually "make you cis". Because supposedly they define transness as the presence of dysphoria, thus relieving dysphoria makes you not-trans anymore. That is why I prefer (and WHO) to base the definition on gender incongruence, or simply "being trans". It might also be based on an individualist and assimilationist approach to transitioning. And it is rooted in internalized transphobia, in your case with a prominent disgust/aversion element.

This might also make you want to be singled out and not be lumped together with the category of trans people. You framed your exposure to us as exposure therapy. This might come off as a bit dehumanizing. It is the solidarity and community with other trans people that is a substinence and steadfastiness parameter, the opposite of individualist assimilationism. It is very important for marginalized groups to come together. Come to think of it, I was active in support groups both online and IRL, and that also helped me get through transition. Actually this is a reason I sought out to be a member of this community, solidarity among trans women must be a given. Just being together with other people like you is something of itself. I always feel relief and sisterhood in the company of trans women, not that I hadn't been disappointed or betrayed. I have.

I tend to think that psychology is just not a matured discipline and operates on poor theories, and at the very least most psychologists leave the field ill equipped to deal with the kinds of issues I had.

This is the closest to the possible reasons I intuitively thought that would be a barrier for you to be helped by therapy. I think you are in error about this on multiple levels, the first is that I don't see a direct link from academic psychology to therapy practice. But some of it is related, and there are studies that show that therapy is effective. The school of thought of therapy is not significant, it seems that the critical factor is the relationship with a therapist and the process itself. So it is a process. These attitudes, together with rationalization, might have been barriers for you to be helped.

Of course it goes without question that the therapist must be knowledgable in gender dysphoria. I also see that you feel like your problems are to specific and particular to be handled by just any therapist, or the field of psychology itself. I don't have an answer for you right there, but I have seen it before. I don't know what it means, but I know that it has hindered people from starting therapy or make them postpone it till their problems become overwhelming. Of course you said you have tried therapy consistently, but you might have been looking down at psychology as a discipline and at the same time not trusting it to understand your specific situation. Rationalization and possible neurodivergence also may be part of it. Your eclecticism (eg PhD psychologists) might not be helpful, I don't know the Southern US situation well, but a PhD could be too sterile academic work. You need someone with relevant field knowledge, clinical experience, and a good fit to you personally. All these are more important factors than PhDs.

To continue a thought from before, this is a way you're setting yourself up to not be helped by therapy. You already bring up yourself several issues that you need to process within a relationship and within a community. So you are smart enough to see that your nightmare and following post here was literally the tip of the iceberg, and there is a bullet list of topics already, internalized misandry, internalized aversion to transness, being unprepared for your new normal, and then the self-esteem issues and being made redundant, which is stressful in itself. Also, this is already too personal and you should not be so open about it on the internet. It belongs to therapy, or other trusted setting. There is also this community's matrix which has encrypted channels and an emotional support room. Best of luck!

[-] marcela 5 points 5 days ago

Great work, and rich resources. Please archive, for those who know how.

[-] marcela 4 points 5 days ago

That's ten in base-based. /joke

[-] marcela 4 points 5 days ago

Edit: Perhaps this was more correct some years ago

I mean this only happened two days ago. Skimming through the comments it seems like it was written by Matt Walsh; it was the BBC.

[-] marcela 15 points 5 days ago

Did you forget yet about how we wrote that there might be data showing that trans people should be more likely to get arrested? What if that were true? Or what if non-binary people are ten times more likely to traffic infants? What if puberty blockers are a kind of sex crime? What if doctors are climbing through windows to suture penises to sleeping cheerleaders? The next time you see a trans person, you ought to ask yourself these questions.

Oh dear that last phrase is the bollocks. ROFL

23
submitted 5 days ago by marcela to c/transgender

In fact, liberals do not even substantially disagree with the core of Trump’s policies. After all, both right-wing and liberal elites are loyal servants of empire, the latter just give it a veneer of humanitarianism. Source: https://lemmy.ml/post/36896947

Authenticity does not have to be subversive. Source: A Sophie Labele's cartoon, showing a girl with a very plain outfit doing embroidery.

And this is why the cultural normalization of Transness is important.

Being trans is something to be normalized as part of a deep cultural change. How deep? As deep as traditional third-genders or other genders are part of the tradition and religion of other cultures such as Africa and India. Trans politics in the Western world right now are strictly informed by the idea that being trans is subversive. Or it should be subversive and it ought to be subversive in order to be worthy of solidarity. The element of subversion is present in the contrary belief also: that Transness genuinely is so subversive as to endanger Western civilization as a whole.

To understand how political groups focus on Transness and understand Transness, Transness should be studied beyond its personal, legal, and medical meanings. It should be studied as an icon and as a symbol, just like advertisers and marketers are extremely aware of the meanings and connotations symbols have. So what are the meanings that Transness, the cultural symbol, carries? What would an advertiser who would use Transness as a symbol would want to convey? Youthfulness? Self-care? Strength?

As a symbol of eccentricity, it is the exemplar of personal freedom of expression, for liberals. But this does not account for cultural systems where being trans is traditional. As a symbol of christian defiance, most celebrated by atheists, it does not account for cultures where Transness has religious connotations.

As a rhetorical device, trans acceptance is tooted as the absolutism of authenticity, acceptance and secularity. It is on this account that it is exploitable as a veneer of humanitarianism. Should transness be part of our normal, conservative, religious life, it would have not these meanings. By not bearing these connotations it would be useless to Democrats, to signal acceptance and inclusion. It would be equally useless to Fascists, who decry excess, and fearmonger about Transness being the bearer of civilizational collapse. It would be useless to Left-wing intellectuals as well, who make careers out of pointing out that the "veneer of humanitarianism" is not true revolution, and thus legitimize alt-right trolls in left-wing spaces, who try to scapegoat trans people as unworthy of solidarity.

Being trans is a normal variation of human ~~sex~~ development. This is the core idea that makes christian nationalists, TERFs, racists, and nazis seethe. It is an idea they are willing to extinguish. They are ready to kill in order to suppress this idea. It is therefore an idea worth having. But what it really means is not that it is eccentric, outlandish, secular, excessive and modern (which can be very good things in and of themselves under certain circumstances). But boring, commonplace, transcedental, modest, and old-fashioned.

This is the true shift we owe to make culturally with regard to Transness. And one that is to be pursued particularly by the Left, whose occasional tendency to certify subversion in order to release solidarity, can be the seed of its eventual moral default.

[-] marcela 3 points 5 days ago

Nice find. I love the color palete and the humor. Definately following this artist.

[-] marcela 4 points 5 days ago

their account name I'm guessing their primary work is with trans inclusion

Hers.

[-] marcela 6 points 5 days ago

TERFs are nazis. And vice versa. Why are you surprised by the latter?

[-] marcela 9 points 5 days ago

It is telling that Labele's work has gone from intellectual takes on being and growin up trans, to mostly counter-TERF comebacks, to strictly political cartoons lately.

Much like the evolution of the copaganda toy equipment, it is an attestation to the rise of fascism.

[-] marcela 9 points 5 days ago

I no-op and further down in my transition, I also know several other women closely, so I hope I am not overstepping here. We all have internalized shit in our brains about how are bodies are supposed to be, and this is why gender-affirming counseling and studying transgender theory is as important as medically transition. Many people have psychological set-backs even after transitioning. Your tissue down there is the exact same tissue that it would be your vagina. The surgeon restored the vagina you would have naturally developed. Same goes for HRT, as it activates the exact receptors that would be active if you had undergone typical female puberty. That is the whole reason HRT works on our bodies in the first place. It can't turn us into dolphins, but it can activate our DNA expression that would have been, because human beings can develop one or the other or yet intermediate ways with respect to sex differentiation. The same embryonic tissue can form the one or the other way, and there is not an essentialist difference between a neovagina/vulva and a typical one. We all have old trauma with our past dysphoria that raises its ugly head but has nothing to do with who we are now and what our bodies look like now. Look, I really don't want to say more, transition is a very private journey, and many people, myself included, have benefited from discussing such things with a specialized affirming therapist. Best of luck and congratulations on your milestone.

33
submitted 2 weeks ago by marcela to c/transgender

They misrepresent facts to push the belief that Trump's crackdown on transgender rights was effective in eradicating the "social contagion" that to them is being transgender.

Very dangerous ideas, circulated by very dangerous people.

On Tuesday, Kaufman posted a Twitter thread declaring that “trans identification is in free fall among the young.” The graph he used to prove it, however, was fundamentally flawed—it showed students who identified as “neither male nor female,” a category that excludes most transgender men and women. In other words, Kaufmann’s supposed evidence of a collapse in “trans identification” was actually a selective chart of nonbinary students, not transgender people as a whole. The distinction didn’t matter to the far-right echo chamber. Matt Walsh seized on the claim, boasting, “Transgenderism is effectively over. We destroyed it,” while Elon Musk reposted the graph to his hundreds of millions of followers, personally thanking Walsh for “playing a major role” in the so-called victory.

9
submitted 2 weeks ago by marcela to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I want to get a feel for other cultures that are not the usual suspects of colonialism and imperialism. Can you suggest some media to get me up to speed with your country's post-war culture?

view more: next ›

marcela

joined 4 months ago