204
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 147 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have a problem with this headline. There's no evidence in this report or in the source article of an actual "wave of political violence" against these officials. They mention the shooting of Charlie Kirk and of the two Democratic politicians in Minnesota. Neither seem to be part of any wave that would target these politicians who are moving into cheap or free housing on military bases. The headline unnecessarily legitimizes their paranoia and their excuses.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 month ago

Steven Miller had to move because of sidewalk chalk outside his house. His wife bravely told reporters they would not back down or cower in fear to the peaceful protests, then he sold his house and ran away.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Brave Sir Stephen ran away,

Bravely ran away, away.

When ~~danger~~ mild criticism reared its ugly head, he bravely turned his tail and fled.

Edit: thank you Nastybutler

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

When mild criticism reared its ugly head

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You're right. Wouldn't want to give him more credit than he deserves.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The chalk terrorism.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's hilarious that you thought the same thing when reading Typhoon's comment...🤣

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Having people know where he lives was scary enough for him. He knows what he's done and he knows no one is happy with it. In America, it's only a matter of time. They all talk a good talk when they are standing behind the military, get them alone on the street and they are just scared little boys without their Mamas.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh we'll know where he lives til it's six feet under. No hiding for that shit

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Having people know where he lives was scary enough for him. He knows what he's done and he knows no one is happy with it. In America, it's only a matter of time. They all talk a good talk when they are standing behind the military, get them alone on the street and they are just scared little boys without their Mamas.

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Welcome to the modern media, they act as the 4th branch of the government and are instrumental in normalization of fascist lies. Journalistic integrity is hard to come by.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 1 month ago

Journalistic integrity

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That's all part of the playbook

[-] Carmakazi@piefed.social 22 points 1 month ago

They know that there is no precedent for such violence against them specifically. But they are also extrapolating, correctly I think, that people will want to kill them for what they are planning to do, above even what they are currently doing.

[-] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

Maybe the Trump administration should stop committing political violence then?

[-] shittydwarf@piefed.social 50 points 1 month ago
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago

So...are we really going to call chalk drawings outside Miller's house, "political violence"? These people are such pussies.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 33 points 1 month ago

Is this "wave of political violence" in the room with us right now? From what I can tell it's pretty much a bunch of libs holding up posterboards and complaining about/mocking officials. I don't think they've got the stomach to be violent quite frankly.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

If you're used to the privilege of nobody ever insulting you to your face, the sting of realising some people aren't afraid to say bad things about you does feel like violence. All mechanisms intended to keep sharp words away from your fragile pride have evidently failed – what's to say those awfully bold people won't hurt you in other ways?

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hopefully the Generals and Admirals remember being kicked out of their top tier housing the next time they are ~~asked~~ ordered to violate citizens constitutional rights.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 month ago

They won't. They'll just blush and drop trow.

[-] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

Stephen Miller soon joined a growing list of senior Trump-administration political appointees—at least six by our count—living in Washington-area military housing, where they are shielded not just from potential violence but also from protest. It is an ominous marker of the nation’s polarization, to which the Trump administration has itself contributed, that some of those top public servants have felt a need to separate themselves from the public. These civilian officials can now depend on the U.S. military to augment their personal security. But so many have made the move that they are now straining the availability of housing for the nation’s top uniformed officers.

Kristi Noem, the Homeland Security secretary, moved out of her D.C. apartment building and into the home designated for the Coast Guard commandant on Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, across the river from the capital, after the Daily Mail described where she lived. Both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth live on “Generals’ Row” at Fort McNair, an Army enclave along the Anacostia River, according to officials from the State and Defense Departments. (Rubio spent one recent evening assembling furniture that had been delivered to the house that day.)

The reported noted that the moves aren’t entirely unprecedented, as national security officials have previously rented homes on bases “for security or convenience.”

Ah, but rented vs rent-free... With little proof of actual risk.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm still making my way through the audiobook version of The Sovereign Individual, and while I keep recommending others should read this thing just because it's so very cynical and this is apparently something very much looked up to by Thiel and Musk....

Anyway, given how these assholes have fled to where they think cannot even be protested, this section really jumped out at me...

Protection will become increasingly technological rather than juridical. The lower classes will be walled out. The move to gated communities is all but inevitable. Walling out troublemakers is an effective as well as traditional way of minimizing criminal violence in times of weak central authority.

[emphasis mine]

This was written in the nineties, and the authors look forward to this with obvious glee. They also have a total disdain for the "unworthy" in their minds. They think people that were/are basically unskilled in the West were/are WAY overpaid and that's due to the evil government extracting wealth from the brave job creators, who, before the information age, were subject to building massive infrastructure in physical locations, the poor dears. The authors look forward to a bright future where the worthy will be able to escape taxes w/o having to sacrifice by living in some third world shithole with a terrible quality of life.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

White House is now House of White Power.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago
[-] prole 12 points 1 month ago

Fuck dude, now he's gonna have to move again

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Needs more dicks, there’s only one in there.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Didn't help, he still looks like a punchable Nazi. If the arrow was a bullet then maybe we would have something here.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

What a crock of crap.

There's no political violence against this sexless matador snowflake. There are just legitimate protests and some chalk that he's afraid of showing his unprecedented manliness.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

There was no violence against this person. The people who wrote pretty basic nonthreatening messages on the sidewalk near his house checked with their security before they did it.

[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Stephen Miller looks like a stiff breeze could kill him.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The wave of violence....that the right wing is instigating, right?

Right?

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

He has the grossest mouth

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Good. I hope they are as uncomfortable as everyone they serve and reflect on that.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Gee, you'd think if so many despise you that maybe, just MAYBE, you're doing a bad job?

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
204 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26580 readers
1351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS