501
submitted 1 week ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Remember, a Trump never pays their debts.

[-] EnderLaw@lemmy.world 149 points 1 week ago

Rough math is every American, rich or poor, old or young, is giving Argentina $100.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 89 points 1 week ago

Or, alternatively, every taxpayer is giving them $200. For reference this is almost three times the amount of his aid cuts from back when.

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Why would the rich be part of this discussion? Not paying taxes, not giving loan to foreign countries.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 13 points 1 week ago

That doesn't even account for China buying all future soybeans from Argentina instead of us. Massive economic impact, even if you never interact with a farm in your lifetime...

[-] bear 2 points 6 days ago

China was already buying 3x more from Brazil largely due to older trade disputes.

https://soygrowers.com/news-releases/soybeans-without-a-buyer-the-export-gap-hurting-u-s-farms/

[-] angband@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

More like the rich are giving 60$ and the middle class are picking up slightly more.

[-] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Please, the rich aren't spending a dime.

The middle class is giving 100 and low income workers are on the hook for everything else.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 126 points 1 week ago

Wow, who knew so many bankers were closet Antifa Generals all along?

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 114 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't lend Trump $40B either. Dude's already been convicted of 34 counts of loan fraud.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 44 points 1 week ago

It's $20B from banks, $20B from the US government.

[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're not lending to Trump though. They're lending to Argentina, and they would get their money back from Argentina.

But banks know they won't get their money back, since Argentina had to be bailed out 20 times in the past 70 years. That's on average, every 3.5 years.

What are the chances they won't need another bailout in the next 5 years? And what are the chances of banks getting their money back from a country that goes bankrupt every 3.5 years?

That's the main reason.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I would neither lend money to Trump or Argentina.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

If Trump starts insulting the banks and trying to impose control on them that would be a sight to see.

[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you can bully banks into giving Argentina $40 billion for nothing, then the whole world's financial system seems to come into question.

[-] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Lol ehat? Banks have been giving loans to Trump although he was deadass broke. If you still believe into any kind of integrity or logic in the world's financial system, you're in for a rough awakening.

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Banks have been giving loans to Trump although he was deadass broke.

Russian ones, sure. They gladly fund a willing ass hat if it means the ruin of the US.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

No, he was using Deutsche Bank, the world's dirtiest bank, for years. His money-laundering activities with Russian mobsters came to light when Deutsche Bank was investigated in the 90s. I was surprised he wasn't arrested back then.

That's why his whining about Comey "spying" on him is such bullshit. The FBI wasn't spying on him, they were investigating a known international criminal with extensive ties to Russian mobsters, which is literally their job.

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

To tRump, any investigation is spying like and no is a suggestion.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah it's not the FBIs fault that Trump REPEATEDLY met with a Russian agent that they were surveiling.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 1 week ago

Trump trying to sale a bad deal to the banks? This has never happened before.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

Radical Leftist Bankers always worried about the dollar!

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

I don’t even understand how he hasn’t been arrested

[-] minnow@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

SCOTUS said POTUS is immune for official acts.

I'm sure there's no conflict of interest involved with that or anything, though. And besides, what could go wrong?

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Well, you see the first step is you just refuse to seat an appointment by the president so you can place the choice of your president after the fact, and claim, we should wait until the election is over.

Then, when your president is in power and the exact same fucking situation happens again with an appointment during an election, you do your best Nelson hahah, and appoint her anyway.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago

scotus and and both houses are afraid of him, so they give him full rubber stamps.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 37 points 1 week ago

also the 40bn is meant to bailout some bessenets former associates who invested poorly in ARGENTINA, not the argentinan people.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's fine, they're not real people anyway. They're poor and foreign, they don't really count.

[-] melonhusk@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

well, it only took them a few decades to learn his credit score isn't just... whatever number he says it is.

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yuge. The biggliest credit score ever seen.

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

Trump can just get President Elon to send the money.

[-] ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf 25 points 1 week ago

I can see the future.

The left isn't capable of stopping trump, but somewhere in his future a disenfranchised right-wing nutjob has his number.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 6 days ago

I really hope not. Him being assassinated would make him a martyr and shit would really hit the fan then.

I hope he dies of natural causes on live TV

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I hope god smites him down with a lighting bolt while he's lying about not being a pedophile on TV.

However he dies, I will celebrate it with a bottle of cheap wine in my cupboard.

[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah. We saw what happened with Charlie Kirk. Killing these people creates a new idol for their followers to worship.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

The attempts on his life have all been from right-wingers.

[-] FailBetter@crust.piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago

the woke banks will pay double!
80B for the patriot Milei!

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

First time seeing such a word

balk
/bɔk/
*verb*
refuse to comply
Synonyms: baulk, jib, resist
*noun*
the area on a billiard table behind the balkline
"a player with ball in hand must play from the balk"
Synonyms: baulk

Hope I can save a search to anybody else.

[-] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Obligatory copypasta:

BALK RULES! IMPORTANT!

1. You can't just be up there and just doin' a balk like that.
1a. A balk is when you
1b. Okay well listen. A balk is when you balk the
1c. Let me start over
1c-a. The pitcher is not allowed to do a motion to the, uh, batter, that prohibits the batter from doing, you know, just trying to hit the ball. You can't do that.
1c-b. Once the pitcher is in the stretch, he can't be over here and say to the runner, like, "I'm gonna get ya! I'm gonna tag you out! You better watch your butt!" and then just be like he didn't even do that.
1c-b(1). Like, if you're about to pitch and then don't pitch, you have to still pitch. You cannot not pitch. Does that make any sense?
1c-b(2). You gotta be, throwing motion of the ball, and then, until you just throw it.
1c-b(2)-a. Okay, well, you can have the ball up here, like this, but then there's the balk you gotta think about.
1c-b(2)-b. Fairuza Balk hasn't been in any movies in forever. I hope she wasn't typecast as that racist lady in American History X.
1c-b(2)-b(i). Oh wait, she was in The Waterboy too! That would be even worse.
1c-b(2)-b(ii). "get in mah bellah" -- Adam Water, "The Waterboy." Haha, classic...
1c-b(3). Okay seriously though. A balk is when the pitcher makes a movement that, as determined by, when you do a move involving the baseball and field of
2. Do not do a balk please.
[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

I dunno why, but I read this entire thing in Danny Devito's voice and that was pretty funny. XD

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's also a baseball term for when a pitcher illegally stops their pitching motion.

BALK RULES! IMPORTANT!

  1. You can't just be up there and just doin' a balk like that.

1a. A balk is when you

1b. Okay well listen. A balk is when you balk the

1c. Let me start over

1c-a. The pitcher is not allowed to do a motion to the, uh, batter, that prohibits the batter from doing, you know, just trying to hit the ball. You can't do that.

1c-b. Once the pitcher is in the stretch, he can't be over here and say to the runner, like, "I'm gonna get ya! I'm gonna tag you out! You better watch your butt!" and then just be like he didn't even do that.

1c-b(1). Like, if you're about to pitch and then don't pitch, you have to still pitch. You cannot not pitch. Does that make any sense?

1c-b(2). You gotta be, throwing motion of the ball, and then, until you just throw it.

1c-b(2)-a. Okay, well, you can have the ball up here, like this, but then there's the balk you gotta think about.

1c-b(2)-b. Fairuza Balk hasn't been in any movies in forever. I hope she wasn't typecast as that racist lady in American History X.

1c-b(2)-b(i). Oh wait, she was in The Waterboy too! That would be even worse.

1c-b(2)-b(ii). "get in mah bellah" -- Adam Water, "The Waterboy." Haha, classic...

1c-b(3). Okay seriously though. A balk is when the pitcher makes a movement that, as determined by, when you do a move involving the baseball and field of

  1. Do not do a balk please.
[-] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wow, first time huh?

So does this mean that we were wrong?

It was never the Russians who had Trump by the balls, it has been the Nazis all along?

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Group effort.

[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump is a Nazi, the biggest one. What other Nazis would have him by the balls?

Putin clearly knows how to lead him around like a dog on a leash.

But he is giving 40 billion dollars to Argentina, very urgently. Why the fuck is he giving 40 billion dollars to Argentina?

[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He needs other Nazi allies, there aren't many of those and he's hoping he can buy some.

[-] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Why not Russian Nazis?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

LOL, that's a fucking shame!

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
501 points (100.0% liked)

News

32959 readers
2474 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS