No. An AI copy of me should not help me decide if I live or die.
There ya go.
No. An AI copy of me should not help me decide if I live or die.
There ya go.
Betteridge's Law holding firm
Boy I sure hope all them suicide jokes don't come and corrupt the data
Boy I sure hope all them roleplay as a functioning member of society don't come and corrupt the data
Boy I sure hope all them fire memes in !tenforward@lemmy.world don't come and corrupt the Data.
spoiler
Doesn't look all that corrupted to me.
Holy shit that's a long article.
Ahmad hopes that AI could help alleviate stress in uncertain moments. For doctors and surrogates, these decisions can be “very emotionally taxing,” Ahmad told Ars, leading many people to second-guess what the patient would choose.
I mean, it should be, no? Just because it's uncomfortable doesn't mean you should just go with RNG.
Nope
For more than a decade, researchers have wondered whether artificial intelligence could help predict what incapacitated patients might want when doctors must make life-or-death decisions on their behalf.
This has been a solved problem ever since medical science has been able to keep people from dying from what would have been historically fatal injuries or illnesses, wtf. Make a living will. Nobody will have to guess or make an LLM puppet make decisions for you if you just write down what you want.
Only if I can decide if the person who asked this fucked up question gets to live or die.
Fuck no. That asshole would know all about the bad shit I've done.
You need a second copy to remind the first that snitches get stitches.
All I see in this article is anal probing.
Managed Democracy was supposed to be satire.
Yeah right, "copy". Wink wink nudge nudge.
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.