1500
Cause and Effect (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 3 days ago

When I was a senior in high school, I needed one more science credit for graduation, so I took Human Anatomy. It was taught by a young hippie (it was the 70s), who also taught the exact same course at the local community college.

It was a great class, with lots of cool labs, experiments, and dissections. We had to memorize every bone, and every muscle. It was one of the hardest classes I've ever taken, but also the most fun.

That class was filled with future doctors and nurses, so none of them were whining about how they'd never use this stuff. But I wasn't on a medical track (I was a music history major), and I could have probably said that (I didn't), but I have used the knowledge I gained in that class literally every single day of my life, decades later. Easily one of the best classes I took in my entire life.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 138 points 4 days ago

I feel like media literacy is more useful for preventing this crap than a scientific education would be, though both help to some degree.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 86 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sure, but a fundamental understanding of the basics, across all disciplines (science , history, literature, and math) helps one spot bullshit from a mile away. Science especially helps apply math and critical thinking.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

IMHO, understanding the Scientific Method and, maybe more importantly, why it is as it is (so, understanding things like Confirmation Bias - including that we ourselves have it without noticing it, which skews our perception, recollection and conclusions - as well as Logical Falacies) is what makes the most difference in how we mentally handle data, information and even offered knowledge from the outside.

PS: Also more broadly in STEM, the structured and analytical way of thinking in those areas also helps in things like spotting logical inconsistencies, circular logic and other such tricks to make the illogical superficially seem logical.

Even subtle but common Propaganda techniques used in the modern age are a lot more obvious once one is aware of one's one natural biases and how these techniques act on and via those biases, purposefully avoiding logic.

Personally I feel that that's the part of my training in Science (which I never finished, since I changed the degree I was taking from Physics to EE half way) is what makes me a bit more robust (though not immune: none of us are, IMHO) to Propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 days ago

I would argue the latter is a good way to learn the former

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

Yep, maths and science are only partially about learning maths and science. The even more important purpose is learning critical reasoning skills, which is a requirement for media literacy.

[-] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 14 points 4 days ago

Exactly, it's not about memorising formulas and facts, but about developing problem solving skills

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago

This is something i noticed early on with the generational divide and misinformation on the internet. Older generations never had the internet in school, and this were never taught how to identify a truthful source. Those of us that grew up with the internet were drilled into our heads, "not everything on the internet is true." From both our teachers and the generation who believes everything on the internet.

It was a big sticking point with my in-laws during covid. Theyd send me a link, and 5 minutes later id respond with, "that person never went to any college has no credentials to be commenting on the scientific and biological effects of vaccines. Here's a published dr saying youre wrong." Only to be met with, "you're an idiot. Go get autism if you want."

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think the flip side of this is Facebook or wherever the link was pushed to your in-laws (which is what I'd guess happened) feels... empowering. Those apps are literally optimized, with billions of dollars (and extensive science, especially psychology), to validate folk's views in the pursuit of keeping them clicking. Their world's telling them they're right; of course your retort will feel offensive and wrong.

They're in a trap.

And I still see lot of scientists posit 'why is this happening?' unironically on Twitter or something, which really frustrates me.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

I will argue this is not the problem. It's that vaccines were too good in their effectiveness. A victim of their own success.

The problem is not and has not been science. The problem is messaging.

This is the same reason why anti-vax is so popular, you think that's about science? It's idiots like RFK Jr and Trump have the ear of people. It's all messaging folks.

A person is smart. People are dumb.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The problem is not and has not been science. The problem is messaging.

Yes, but the actual factor driving this is the meteoric rise of the top 1% richest, it is wealth inequality that creates a coherence to misinformation by establishing systematic incentives. There have always been nebulous, destructive, cancer like forces of misinformation, it is as human as human can be but we aren't really fighting to transcend the pitfalls our own nature, we are fighting to get on the same page about the rich fucking us all over by artificially supercharging these tendencies within us for their own gain.

It is irrational to just see this as an abstract conversation about the human brain's susceptibility to misinformation as it ignores the costly material operation being undertaken to manipulate us with said misinformation.

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I have to agree about the too good in their effectiveness. To get to a point where people are just like, “Nah, it ain’t a big deal” is built atop the millions of dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 4 days ago

the problem is most emphatically not people skipping stuff in school, the problem is that the world is filled with people who have literally researched how to mislead and manipulate people. The only classes i think would actively help protect you against this is history and political science.

We can't expect everyone to be educated in every field so they can recognize misinformation, what we need is for everyone to recognize fascism and general authoritarian methods.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To your point, I've met quite a few STEM educated people who fall for this type of misinformation due to lack of historical and political literacy.

Quite a few are also quite disrespectful to the humanities so they tend to be empathetically underdeveloped since they feel their whole life is about producing results and making progress at any cost necessary.

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I’m really happy to see this discussion here. Intellectual self defense comes from a well rounded liberal arts education. The type of people who whine about having to take general education and non science courses are already displaying an alarming lack of critical thinking skills; they are exactly the ones who need it most.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 14 points 4 days ago

Appeal to emotions, rather than logic, and if you pull the right lever, that person will get a bias confirmation, feel smarter for knowing something everyone else doesn't and in some cases, feel less insecure for not knowing enough.

I've met people that have a degree or that are even teaching and have the worst baseless believes. It's only a matter of getting to your levers.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago

Media literacy and how to validate sources. Unfortunately, the second part was primarily taught in college when I was still in school.

Critical thinking is very difficult to teach. Its so much easier for people to just accept whatever confirms their current preconceived notion. It also requires that the person is both open to learning new things and that they are open to the idea that they may be wrong, misinformed, or not know everything.

So many people are simply over confident about their own knowledge.

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

A bit of philosophy/media would help as well, it doesn't help to teach someone science, if they don't understand what science is.

[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

the bigger problem is that some teachers are so mentally checked out that they make those subjects actively unappealing. I wonder what makes them that way...

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

This is an important comment. We do not teach science on high schools , we stream students to science if they are self directed, then everyone else takes bullshit courses for an easy grade, these days acheived with LLMs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 58 points 4 days ago

I studied history (and by that I mean I liked to watch documentaries) and as a kid I saw educational cartoons and Anime (yes anime) that showed how there was a huge backlash against telephone and telegraphy when they first came out. With farmers blaming telegraph wire for destroying crops or crop diseases and they would sometimes even sabotage the wires and poles.

When I heard of the 5G bullshit that was literally what came to mind... it is incredible how eternal this form of ignorance is.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago

the problem is that critical thinking should be a reflex and not a mental effort

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blindsite@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

Your garden and kitchen = biochemistry and biology. Home improvement, crafting and anything to do with the trades = physics. Household cleaners, gas, automotive chemicals and plastics = chemistry + healthcare = more organic chemistry and biology. Just dealing with everyday life is science.

Look I think one of the fundamental problems here is we have a cultural divide between people with thousand dollar degrees and everyday people. When someone says "I'm not going to be a scientist" they're probably thinking "I can't afford to pay thousands of dollars to pay for a degree" whilst actual scientists are wondering "why don't people pursue this subject more?" Money. Pure and simple. Real science = cooking, building something, worrying about that scum in your sink, trying to figure out the best cleaner that won't set off an allergic reaction, and yes looking into the side effects of vaccines and assorted drugs. You want people to think scientifically then call them scientists. Don't create an economic barrier for those who want to pursue knowledge. And don't treat science like it only happens in labs. It's an every day process. Science = the study of nature and everybody can do that every day. You don't need an expensive degree to do that. So being a "scientist" shouldn't be limited to those in white coats, getting grants and have a dozen plaques on their wall that cost a couple thousand dollars to buy.

[-] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

My homeschooling, flat earth believing, anti vax mother never taught me science. She said I would never be a scientist so that was enough reason for her.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, we're not talking about people with expensive degrees. The earth is not flat, and mcgyver is not an elitist. These things should be obvious with a high school level of education.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago

I'm so glad that people finally start to grasp, how bad excessive specialisation really is.

society is healing

[-] sleen@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Once I was doubting the need for higher levels of mathematics. Now as an engineer I realize the utility of this knowledge.

What made my change my mind? Well it's definitely not my intelligence nor my age, it's the practical application of that theory which got me here. Reading in between the lines can only happen if you like what you're doing.

[-] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago

I have a similar relationship with math. Only that I learnt to admire it through 3D and shaders.

Check out Shadertoy.com

People there create works of art from something, that's usually perceived as "cold". I'm still in awe of how people, using "cold" analythical methods achieve something so full of soul. I think it deserves to be appreciated far more than it is now. This is literal magic.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If smart people are so smart, why aint they in charge? Checkmate nerds!

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Smart people" are generally not rich people. They are coerced into labor like anyone else. Sometimes their labor is even useful.

They generally don't have the time or reason to participate in a counter-productive popularity contest.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Because with educatio comes a sense of ethics and responsibility. Anyone with ethics will never get accepted into any political party.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 25 points 4 days ago

i think that conspiracy theories are more about feeling special about knowing some secret knowledge, lots of people fall for this and even create conspiracy theories without realizing, no matter how smart they are

[-] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago

Kelly johnson designed the SR71 Blackbird because he was given the alien tech from rosswell new mexico to reverse engineer! No other way could the government trust 1 man with a blank check book and complete authority and have the plane designed and flying in such a short amount of time!

-my favorite conspiracy theory

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

and even create conspiracy theories without realizing

Me when I feel like things are okay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Ah so close. This comic should end with

"I did my own research"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

I've seen a lot of the counter balance to this which is STEM folk not having respect for the humanities, rendering them empathetically underdeveloped.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] waldo_was_here@piefed.social 16 points 4 days ago

Dunning-Kruger effect in full force in a land called Distopia States of Amerika

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

Not only there, it's a world wide phenomenon. I keep hearing this kind of shit from people here in Germany and my family in Brazil.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

People need to learn how to build a "firewall" for their brain.

[-] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 days ago

And epistemology to help build the firewall's list?

"It is the mark of an educated mind, to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily accepting nor rejecting it" --Whoever said that.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's a big problem, more if in the education system is based only on the in the accumulation of data and on the other hand without putting priorities in reasoning, worse when science is strongly influenced by absurd religious beliefs. They want usefull and submissive subjects, not thinking people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
1500 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16978 readers
1403 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS