250

Google’s YouTube has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit by President Donald Trump over his 2021 account suspension following the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

According to documents filed in federal court in California, $22 million of the settlement will be contributed to the Trust for the National Mall to help pay for the construction of the White House State Ballroom. The rest will go to other plaintiffs, including the American Conservative Union.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnotFlickerman 172 points 2 days ago

$22 million of the settlement will be contributed to the Trust for the National Mall to help pay for the construction of the White House State Ballroom.

I hate everything so fucking much right now. I'm just so fucking tired of it being so god damned stupid and shitty day after day.

[-] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Same, it's pretty maddening. I want to stop hearing about stuff that's going to deteriorate my general health but at the same time I don't want to be blindsided by all the stuff that will have a legitimate impact on my life.

It's all so insanely stupid and I'm so tired of him getting away with all the bullshit without even trying. Feels like the whole government is just his condom puppets that say yes to his every whim and just allow him to fuck over the country

[-] SnotFlickerman 57 points 2 days ago

Not even just the government. These are basically payoffs from companies like Google to curry favor.

I'm so sick of these companies that sold themselves as making the world a better place for two fucking decades immediately just turning tail and deciding actually just paying off the king for better treatment positioning is better than democracy. It's all so short sighted and absolutely fuck-stupid.

[-] 100@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago

start collecting names of people doing this and deal with them after this regime is gone

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Or before it's gone, less judicially.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

What, did you expect MBAs to be smart?

[-] SnotFlickerman 5 points 2 days ago

I mean, fair, but we're talking about Alphabet/Google/Youtube which was founded and run by two computer scientists until very recently. To my knowledge both Sergei Brin and Larry Page continue to be controlling shareholders, and while Page stepped down in 2019, Brin came back in 2023 to contribute to Google's AI efforts.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

Just because they vote on some stuff once a year doesn't mean they control the company.

[-] SnotFlickerman 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I guess my point is Google was shit long before this when those guys still ran the company. Hell, even Eric Schmidt was a former computer engineer.

Brin was even at Trump's inauguration along with current CEO Sundar Pinchai.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago
[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

If you want to feel worse, even if that whole $22 million went to funding the construction of a ballroom, thats barely only 10% of the 'cost.'

[-] oxysis 14 points 2 days ago

I don’t want to be on this stupid fucking planet anymore

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

I like this planet, I want them off it.

[-] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 days ago

I'm far over from living in these so-called "interesting times". Because things aren't interesting, it's just getting depressingly degrading by the second. Like, all of this bullshit is a huge vacuum that discards any level of optimism. No good news short of knowing this man or anyone in his administration is dead and gone will suffice.

Wished that damn assassin was a better shot, the ear wasn't good enough.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Hope you're all ready to live the rest of your lives in a pseudo-Russia.

We're well on our way. Probably too far to stop it, to be honest.

Shit country. Shit populace.

[-] prole 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unfortunately, I think we're already there. They moved very quickly.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

How in the hell can anyone successfully sue over an account on a video sharing site? Brick and mortar stores have the right to refuse service, why not online services? Or does Google just want a way to give Donald John Trump money without it looking as obvious?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Its about bribing them to keep contracts etc

[-] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago

Fucking Americans are so fucking stupid, just watching their country devolve into a fascist crime mob run by fucking clowns, sponsored by their favourite companies.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Beyond protesting i don't know of much else i can do here.

[-] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

It's called civil DISOBEDIENCE. NOT protesting. BE DISOBEDIENT. Just do it CIVILY. It's always worked when ENOUGH people DISOBEY. NOT when they protest.

Protesting doesn't do much but make Billionaires laugh at the fact they convinced you history is full of successful protests. It's not. It's full of successful civil Disobedience.

It's just more dangerous than ever to do. But also worth it more than ever.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Protests behind police lines are just state sponsored venting sessions.

What does effective civil disobedience look like for the average worker?

Workplace resistance: Refusing to follow company policies that exploit workers or endanger others. For example, dock workers refuse working on ships carrying arms, warehouse workers slowing down production, or service workers collectively refusing to enforce discriminatory rules.

Withholding labor: Strikes are the most visible form, but even small coordinated actions like doing only what is contractually required, nothing extra, can be civil disobedience.

Supporting boycotts: Refusing to consume or sell products linked to oppression.

Community-based defiance: Helping neighbors resist evictions, sharing food outside of state regulated channels, or organizing mutual aid despite restrictions.

Symbolic defiance: Wearing or displaying political symbols at work or in public even when banned, as a way to disrupt the normalization of injustice.

Disrupt “business as usual". Don't let them use your labor to exploit others and ruin your future for their profits. Land another job offer and threaten to resign if oppressive decisions aren't reversed, and follow threw when they call your bluff.

Your labor is there lifeline, don't forget that.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I think your point to boycotting makes sense every other point only applies if I work for one of those major companies, I dont, my company respects the labor they have and provides us great compensation and stability, definitely not the norm within my the sector. So sure I'll be stopping using Google services as much but I can't withhold their labor and anything I do at my workplace will have zero effect on those companies.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean I'll be switching away from google services. Boycotts and strikes are the last remaining peaceful solutions

[-] natecox@programming.dev 68 points 2 days ago

Do you all remember when these snowflakes were crying about the mean liberals not respecting a bigot cake maker refusing to make cakes?

Free market unless the big orange baby gets his feelings hurt, I guess

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Blatant unapologetic hypocrisy is a primary tactic and feature of their ideology. It's about time people quit being surprised by it or thinking that they would be shamed by having it pointed out. They won't be shamed; they revel in it because the ability to be hypocritical with impunity demonstrates their power.

[-] prole 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly this. We need to stop even acknowledging it.

[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago

It's a way to secure bribes for the president. He files frivolous lawsuits and then shakes them down for settlements.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 39 points 2 days ago

Even tech oligarchs allied to the regime do this, as we see here. It's not just the shakedown, it's also just a much easier way to pay him. Easier to explain than briefcases of cash or the very obvious money laundering that he tries to pretend is a real estate business.

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yup Google is about to be handed a DoD or DOJ contract for cloud.

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago
[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Open corruption and bribes is the name of the game for republicans and their tiny orange leader.

[-] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

What's a backbone?

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I wish I still used Google products so I could stop using them now

[-] doctortofu@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

Can you bend the knee so hard it breaks? Because that's what all those companies are doing...

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

If you're already using ublock to skip their ads, does boycotting YouTube help? Genuine question, on the one hand you're giving them metrics but on the other, you're using their resources without really giving them anything.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

Boycotting helps but it has to be done on scale which almost never happens because people are spoiled and lazy. There has to be a huge momentum.

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

For me sadly all of the creators are there and i am hoping some of them jump to peertube or something

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 4 points 2 days ago
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

I maintain that american corporations should be beholden to the bill of rights. A random citizen can choose to ban people from their forum, but an "open forum" where they are exploiting their users, shouldn't have that luxury.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

If it's an "open forum" or "the public square" as it's also been called, it should be owned and regulated by the government, not controlled by a for-profit corporation.

Either way, what you're suggesting is forcing corporations to provide a platform for fascism. That goes WAY beyond free speech protection and into compelling services/prohibiting moderation.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
250 points (100.0% liked)

News

32546 readers
2840 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS