493
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 147 points 1 week ago

It's not news. My personal date for the start of dictatorship in the United Stated is March 14, 2025: that's the first instance of Trump and his henchmen disobeying a court decision.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago

I think it was earlier, when the supreme Court ruled that the president could do what he wanted as long as it was part of his duties and THEY get to decide what is part of his duties.

Yes I did say duty. Grow up.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Mans be getting his duties all over the constitution

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Thank you for this because I wasn't serious about growing up. Never grow up!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

IMO it's the day he took power the second time.

As he said plainly, "I'll be a dictator from day one". And then millions of Americans looked at his record, looked at all the crimes he'd been found guilty of, considered his promise, and voted for him anyway.

Real Darwin Award shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Mk23simp 47 points 1 week ago

I would trace it back to September 11, 2001 at least. Specifically, the highly authoritarian response to that. There's a direct line from what the US government started doing then to what they're doing now.

[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago

Yes indeed. Bin Laden can be proud, the terrorists won

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 19 points 1 week ago
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

1832 called and wants to remind you of Worcester v. Georgia. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Worcester-v-Georgia

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

My date is 2014 when a Princeton study concluded that the USA is not a democracy, but an oligarchy.

[-] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 94 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They decided to wait and see if Trump won, and if Homan then accepted bribes. It would be a much more airtight case. So the Biden people handed the investigation off to the Trump people, no doubt holding out the vain hope that the career people would persuade the political people that someone taking a bag of cash was something that ought to be investigated.

The fucking ineptitude of the Liberal elites never ceases to amaze me.

[-] RenLinwood 28 points 1 week ago

They're not inept, they're corrupt

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Little bit of column A, little bit of column B

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The reality is that the democrats would much rather have a fascist dictatorship, than work in the interest of the people. The answer to "why?" has always, and will always be "money". They sold out the american people to fascists, because openly taking bribes is more important than the lives of minorities.

The democrats have held a trifecta of power twice in the past 15 years, and both times they have managed to do absolutely fuck all. Why? Because they weren't paid to actually do any of the things they promised their voters. They just used those talking points because people would vote for them.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

More specifically, because they need to maintain the capitalist status quo that they sincerely believe in (it works for them!), so they believe fascism to be the lesser evil. And they think they can control fascism, just like last time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

I mean, Princeton released a study over a decade that the U.S. was no longer a democracy but an oligarchy. I understand that the author means where descending into authoritarianism, but this didn't start with Trump, and we left democracy behind a long time ago.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The timing is worse than that. The study was only released in 2014, but it used data from 1981-2002, nearly 3 decades ago.

Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens | Perspectives on Politics | Cambridge Core - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/abs/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 45 points 1 week ago

There was a time when we considered countries where women couldn't vote as a "democracy"

The goal posts shifted. As they should.

In the 21st century, I don't think we can call a system without rank choice voting a democracy. The US has never met modern standards of a Democracy

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

That eliminates pretty much the entire commonwealth except Australia, right?

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I think clinging on to inherited royalty is another big point against "democracy", no matter how vestigial.

[-] Fredthefishlord 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the 21st century, I don't think we can call a system without rank choice voting a democracy. The US has never met modern standards of a Democracy

While I very much hope the goal posts can be shifted that far, I think we haven't quite made it there yet

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 week ago

The US briefly experimented with democracy during Reconstruction but that was quickly defeated and it never happened again.

[-] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Correct. The US is now one of those shit hole countries Trump keeps talking about.

[-] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe none of these 1st world nations aren't what they say they are. Maybe they are more like farms and they have mastered the psychology to convince people not only to be the workers but also the product. Wealthy people making their product pay for itself to supply their greedy habits.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

It has been a uniparty for decades.

[-] Fredthefishlord 17 points 1 week ago

No, it hasn't. Both parties are not the same, and saying as such is simply pro republican propaganda

[-] Ruxias@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Kamala "Do Not Come" Harris

Joe "Nothing Will Fundamentally Change" Biden

Nancy "Insider Trading is Fine, Actually" Pelosi

They both serve capital first, all the rest is rhetoric to keep you frustrated and bewildered - unable to realize it. You'll spend the rest of eternity focusing on the outrage of the week, blind to the fact that the economics of the day dictate how they steer your thought and energy. When the chips are down, none of them worry about your poor non-capital-having ass.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Yep. This is it. They are minions of money. Genocide? It's profit. That's why neither side cares.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I mean, both parties are objectively crap. One of them is just more objectively crap.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Okay, but you need to admit that one party was Violently Fascist while the other party was merely Controlled Opposition.

I definitely prefer the empty vistage of democracy to the vulgar dismemberment of it. So you need to admit Democrats are better. And then you need to say you voted for them. And donated. And campaigned. And proselytized on their behalf.

Otherwise, I'm going to call you a Russian bot

[-] F_State@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

Democrats lived in denial that they could ride being "the lesser of two evils" forever but eventually as things got worse and worse people started becoming numb to it

Tip to writers.

Please don't use regional persian slang for bribe when trying to sound sophisticated.

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

This is only news for brain-damaged americans.

Land of the $2-trillion military budget, and the biggest prison population. and in the last two years, your elected policitians sent $30 billions from your taxes to a genocidal aparthied because they represent and serve the interests of another country

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago

Never had been

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Was it a democracy when women and people of color couldn't vote?

Was it a democracy when the two party system artificially limited your options in the voting booth?

I don't think it was ever a democracy.

[-] F_State@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Was it a democracy

Well, yes. Both the ancient forms of governance resembling what we call democracy and the Greek system that gives us the word Democracy typically excluded people to various degrees. Don't take that as a value judgement, I support anything that enfranchises more people, not less but I won't try to redefine words

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah the billionaires run that country

[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

The US is a Republic, not a democracy. Here to tell you that. We also are not even in the top 10 most free and democratic countries.

[-] starchylemming@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

what do you mean, why either or?

there is a bunch of democratic republics

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

...

We're a "republic" with an "electoral" college. We were never a democracy.

Edit: I don't want a direct democracy. I'm not a republican. I'd prefer communism. Fucking fascists.

The electoral college was designed to protect democracy in times when the people's vote was easily swayed due to misinformation. Gerrymandering compromised that. Now we have an orange figurehead dismantling our agencies. Why are people disagreeing?

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 42 points 1 week ago

We're a "republic" with an "electoral" college. We were never a democracy.

Nonsense. That’s the sort of disinformation I see the right trying to spread to defend fascism.

“Democracy” is simply a form of government where the rule or power (kratos) derives from the people (demos). A form where representatives are elected to make decisions is called “representative democracy.”

A “republic” is a form of government that isn’t a monarchy.

We have a representative democratic republic. Our system has its serious flaws, but that doesn’t make it not a democracy.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 21 points 1 week ago

We don't have a representative democracy.

According to a Princeton study from like a decade ago no major public policy has reflected public opinion since the end of the civil rights era.

If we were a representative democracy then the will of the demos would be reflected in the government and its decisions. But it's just not.

In practice the US has been an oligarchy for at least half a century. I suspect it always has been just with brief interludes when people power breaks through like the civil rights era and the new deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] prole 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ughh...

Didn't expect this old chestnut to show up on lemmy. Usually people here are better informed.

"Democracy" and "republic" are not mutually exclusive. The US is (well was) both.

[-] princessnorah 14 points 1 week ago

Australia is a constitutional monarchy but we're still a democracy.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
493 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25910 readers
2343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS