468

Postal traffic into the United States plunged by more than 80% after the Trump administration ended a tariff exemption for low-cost imports, the United Nations postal agency said Saturday.

The Universal Postal Union says it has started rolling out new measures that can help postal operators around the world calculate and collect duties, or taxes, after the U.S. eliminated the so-called “de minimis exemption” for lower-value parcels.

Eighty-eight postal operators have told the UPU that they have suspended some or all postal services to the United States until a solution is implemented with regard to U.S.-bound parcels valued at $800 or less, which had been the cutoff for imported goods to escape customs charges.

“The global network saw postal traffic to the U.S. come to a near-halt after the implementation of the new rules on Aug. 29, 2025, which for the first time placed the burden of customs duty collection and remittance on transportation carriers or U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency-approved qualified parties,” the UPU said in a statement.

The UPU said information exchanged between postal operators through its electronic network showed traffic from its 192 member countries — nearly all the world countries — had fallen 81% on Aug. 29, compared to a week earlier.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Putin is doing a good job of destroying America from within.

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

My American GE dishwasher just broke and I ordered a part from their US based site. The 17$ part ships from China, I have no idea what’s going to happen. Guessing I’ll be handwashing dishes from here on.

[-] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 3 hours ago

To me, this is one of the largest issues. I don't know -- or historically have needed to know -- where my goods actually come from. I buy a thing for a price and it is delivered to me. When I buy common goods, I probably go to a store, but for anything that is uncommon, like a machine part, I'll find it online.

The internet and internet commerce has done wonders to allow us to buy a type 34 widget from ACME without having to spend hours finding a store that carries it or can custom-order it.

The de minimis exemption revocation does two things in the short term: increase the price of a type 34 widget due to tariffs, and add uncertainly as to whether it will come with unexpected overhead like a flat customs fee (sorry, reddit link), delays, or paperwork. People will choose to not buy items, from anywhere, when the rules are both constantly changing and unclear.

The rest applies to tariffs in general, and not the de minimis exemption.

In the long term, we're also fucked. Orange-D's policies have been struck down multiple times. In this case, I think he's asked the Supreme Court to rule on a tariff appeal in the last few days. Almost regardless of the outcome of that, our goods prices will rise, since the companies that sell them will never reduce the price just because the tariffs are removed.

This is the scam: If you are in on the timing, you can buy-low-sell-high when news hits about tariffs and make a ton of money off stocks. We don't have that info, so we can't act on it without guessing. Instead, the regular citizen just has to eat the added price of goods.

[-] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

When my large appliances broke under warranty I'd sometimes find replacement parts on Amazon or eBay, install myself, and keep the replacement that inevitably shows up 90 days later as a spare.

Better than washing dishes by hand

[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago

All part of their plan to gut and strip America and take whatever money they can before Donny and his friends die.

So what if they ruin America for the next 50 years? They will be dead and the people they hate will suffer. Remember to thank your GOP neighbor for this.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago

It's what 77 million wanted. So, fuck them.

[-] parip@lemmy.cif.su 9 points 7 hours ago

Of course they push tariffs through but raising taxes on the ruling class is never mentioned.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 60 points 22 hours ago

Hot take: ending Chinese drop-shipping for cheap junk from Temu, etc. might actually be a good thing.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 11 points 6 hours ago

The thing is that not every idea they have is bad. No one wants an overflow of cheap junk from China, but the problem is obviously how they're going about it - basically halting trade in general rather than having a logical and pragmatic way of working; but then again their end goal isn't actually to improve USA or to help regular Americans in any way so it figures.

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Hot take almost everything you own was partially or fully made in China or other Asian countries

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, we've had a problem for a very long time. The tariffs should have been in place years to decades ago. We let US companies purchase from other countries and then resell in the US for easy profit. We allowed it to the point where U.S. manufacturing atrophied to the brink of non-existence.

We need a massive federal program to bring manufacturing back through small companies. Giant incentives to start manufacturing businesses. Create infrastructure to provide raw materials at cost to these companies by taxing the piss out big companies.

Once you can source plastic and metal goods in the US again, then start running tariffs, and only run it on goods that we can affordably manufacture here.

None of these manufacturing companies need to have yacht owners running them. Engineer it to keep it small. Force them to put the profits back into the people. Hell, maybe force them to be employee owned to get the grant.

[-] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If I can ask, have you spent any time in the Rust Belt? Because I grew up there, and I can tell you that Americans don't actually want plastics manufacturing in their backyard, nor will they appreciate the lung cancer and COPD rates skyrocketing because some dipshit has misplaced nostalgia for a time you most likely didn't even live through.

For a time, I was quite close to manufacturing workforce development in the US. The dirty little secret that nobody who kvetches about American manufacturing will ever acknowledge out loud is that we have plenty of manufacturing in the US, but manufacturers have the plants in places where people cannot affordably travel, nor do natural American workers seem to want to actually do factory work.

They all say they do, by I can tell you from looking at actual jobs data that only 1/10 American workers who start at a factory job actually remain there longer than a month. To fix any of this, we all need to first acknowledge that maybe manufacturing doesn't exist as much because it's a shitty job with low pay, low security, and carries a high risk of on-the-job injury. None of y'all are gonna be lining up to be the guy who agitates the molten steel while it's being transported from the forge to the smelter. Do you know how many people were just encased in molten steel? Do you know how often we just sorta moved on without even compensating the family? Enough so that the American labor union practically began in Pittsburgh.

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

People yearn for the time when a man could work 40 hours a week and afford to support an entire family, and buy a home, and buy some nice appliances, while still getting vacation time.

That time was factory work in the 50s. But it wasn't the factory work they want, it's the wages. They don't realize that factory work now is the conditions you mentioned plus less wages than McDonald's.

[-] theolodis@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like you wish for a planned economy, like China has it.

But why are you guys voting for fascists, liberals and not communists if you want communism (profits going to the people), and a planned economy?

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

You have no right to claim you know who I voted for.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

To be fair in the US you have 2 realistic options and OPs description applies to both... unfortunately the case in a few places right now.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 41 points 20 hours ago

Ending all parcels from 88 countries is not,

[-] notgold@aussie.zone 13 points 19 hours ago

Yeah cheap temu crap is one thing. Localised products from other nations just won't happen on the individual level and will require a USA company to act as a middle man. In Australian news, we keep hearing about companies that are losing a large chunk of trade because of this. Most are small businesses with niche products; emu leather, kangaroo products, eucalyptus oil, etc. All things that are only made in Australia.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 19 hours ago

Even having a middle man won't help. The postal services are not engaging until there is a system in places and clarity.

Sure, mass shipping can work, but is cost prohibitive for all niche products, like you've mentioned unless they have a giant distribution deal.

They don't want to get the ultimate bill for the duties owed. They don't usually keep customer information, so it needs to be collected up front or not at all.

[-] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Millions of small retail or craft businesses now out of business: "haha so true bestie!"

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago

not everyone buys from temu, some chinese products for asian business owners need the other stuff especially around asian related foods ingredients.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 126 points 1 day ago

Next Up: "Hey, do we even NEED a postal service?"

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago

They're going to privatize it

[-] mokus 17 points 14 hours ago

And then we get to hear the endless litany of “hey why is shipping 20x more expensive now here in Bumfuck Montana?” And blaming Biden for it

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 16 hours ago

yea he wants dejoys company to takeover, hes been angling for it for years. Although its wierd that dejoy barely did anything under biden.

[-] prole 6 points 7 hours ago

I think he just wanted to fly under the radar when Biden was in charge. Biden couldn't remove him personally, but I think there were mechanisms for his removal in there somewhere...

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That's what these assholes have been saying ever since they got on AOL in the mid-90s - "hey, email and FedEx can do everything USPS does, why don't we just get rid of it?"

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

What's interesting is I believe the postal service was losing money on Chinese Epackets.

[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago

Isn't it misleading to say they are losing money when they are funded by taxpayer dollars?

[-] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

USPS is self funded, and only until a couple years ago now were we losing money. Once retirement prefunding was repealed we started making money again

[-] prole 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

USPS is self funded

Cool. It doesn't mean we start giving a shit about profit margins. It's a public service. Sometimes it's gonna cost us money.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

The Epackets problem isn't about profit margins, it's about one country saddling part of the shipping cost on another. They also come in these awful plastic bags called "china sacks" and they are made from like a multitude of different shredded plastics so they can't be recycled. They get like literally tons and tons of these bags each month and China won't take them back.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 16 hours ago

no wonder the gop was pissed, they had been planning for decades for it to cripple the USPS, and why dejoy probably wasnt doing much under biden.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago

The USPS has been self funded for quite some time

[-] smh@slrpnk.net 8 points 23 hours ago

I thought the USPS was funded through usage fees/stamps.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
468 points (100.0% liked)

News

32054 readers
2104 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS