272
submitted 14 hours ago by zero@fek.xyz to c/news@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 300 million Americans’ Social Security data was put at risk after Department of Government Efficiency officials uploaded sensitive information to a cloud account not subject to oversight, according to a whistleblower disclosure submitted to the special counsel’s office Tuesday.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 71 points 14 hours ago

This was deliberate. We all saw it coming. We all shouted warnings from the rooftops. They knew what would happen, and did it anyway.

They're all traitors to the American people and should be dealt with as such.

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 10 hours ago

Welcome to the Cassandra Club.

I should start an IG of "we told you so" videos like the We Do Not Care Club.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago

Failure to adhere to his oath to uphold and defend the constitution. It's flagrant

[-] TotallynotJessica 56 points 14 hours ago

More than 300 million? So basically everyone? Are we even living in a real country at this point?

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

Your oligarch overlords certainly don't consider it so. You are just walking dollar signs living for nothing else but to get fleeced by people who already have more money than they could ever spend in several lifetimes.

[-] Ging@anarchist.nexus 13 points 13 hours ago

"That's all of them, isn't it?" -My thoughts post-glance

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

So once the dust settles what is the new govt to do? Too many turncoats to prosecute?

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

This administration and the Supreme Court have been systematically shredding the constitution and destroying the rule of law. They have declared the president to be above the law, are eroding the limits of executive power at every opportunity, and have essentially declared that the rights of the people can be ignored without consequences.

This might seem great to an authoritarian when they are in power, but the flipside is that it fundamentally changes the moral equation faced by the opposition. Normally those who actually have principles and want to maintain the rule of law are going to show restraint and reinforce the norms. But when the other side responds by becoming an even bigger threat, there must be a tipping point after which the danger of using unjust powers against your opponent are outweighed by the danger of allowing them to continue damaging civilization and risking their return to power.

The gerrymandering situation in California and Texas is a perfect example of this. In principle, gerrymandering should not be allowed. But if we want to protect democracy, it is more dangerous to let one side cheat than it is to respond in kind.

I would like to believe that we will be able to close pandora's box and return to something resembling normalcy some day. But with each new abuse of power and each attack on the laws and norms that are supposed to keep the government in check, it gets harder to see a way out that isn't horrific in its own right.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

You’ve basically written what I’ve been trying to process and put into words for a long while now. Thanks for the fantastic commentary.

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

A new government is not just going to magically appear. The current one (and by that is meant the entire GOP) is not going to leave voluntarily, and they are certainly not going to let you have a fair election about that.

So the dust will settle once this current regime has been forcefully ousted, not before. So talking about "after" is a bit premature, the talk should be about what to be done to get rid of them in first place.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 4 points 12 hours ago

If the country survives, what they should do is rip the whole thing apart and start again. Like a second republic with a new constitution or something. There is no coming back from what's happening with the institutions.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 13 hours ago

The government is going to say that the government is not efficient and capable enough to handle this. Yes, that's a self-fail but their voters eat it up anyway. The solution, they say, is privatization and Trump gives the whole thing to his buddies. And then you'll have to pay a premium tier subscription to get a timely response, most likely AI generated, from what used to be a government function.

[-] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

That’s what we said in the 1860s, and look what happened: We allowed them to continue telling lies for another 160 years until they tried once again to make their lies our truth.

No, this time we need to prosecute the traitors. We’ve got time.

[-] TotallynotJessica 3 points 12 hours ago

It should happen, but it won't.

[-] zero@fek.xyz 7 points 14 hours ago
[-] TotallynotJessica 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

A dictatorship that'll see decades of instability when he predictably dies, just like after the death of Cesar.

[-] atticus88th@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago
[-] TotallynotJessica 2 points 12 hours ago

There was a more popular sentiment of some legal consistency, but after Trump I wouldn't be surprised if we end up in a failed state, for better and mostly worse.

[-] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

Trump will get asked and say “I don’t know anything about it, you’ll have to ask Elon”.

He’ll call anyone who takes a position he doesn’t like “incompetent” while routinely demonstrating actual incompetence.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Typical narcissist. Blame everyone but themself

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Hahahaha... No shit. A 12-year old with an elementary knowledge of databases could tell you that. And the data is probably safer there, than with a gang of thugly idiots hired by a literal nazi.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Big Balls move (literally)

[-] Ging@anarchist.nexus 3 points 12 hours ago

Of all the things to be literally correct😮‍💨

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

To the surprise of absolutely no one.

[-] ImperialATAT@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

It would be interesting to see if there were any 1%ers, billionaires, or republican officials data present in there, or if it appears to be curated to target… ummm… the majority of us.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Salting the earth in case this regime change doesn't stick?

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

What did anyone expect from massive cuts with zero thought involved?

[-] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They sure are ~~fueling~~ fighting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse^TM^.

Obviously, the only solution is to dissolve the SSA and cancel all benefits before this can be exploited. We should create a new agency called TrumpAIDS to replace it, but reduce staff, funding, and benefits by 90%.

Much efficiency!

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
272 points (100.0% liked)

News

31865 readers
2517 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS