984
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 105 points 1 month ago

Everyone who’s dealt with kids knows you have to bisect the giraffe equally from nose to tail so everyone gets 2 legs, or somebody will cry that it’s unfair.

[-] pfwood178@sh.itjust.works 101 points 1 month ago

Everyone who deals with scientists knows they assume a perfectly spherical, frictionless, giraffe.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 48 points 1 month ago
[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

lol a giraffe would never fit in my vacuum.

[-] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

You have to remember to take the Elephant out first.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bulwark@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

I let one cut and the other gets to pick first.

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

This is the way. And from experience, it will result in sub-nanometer size differences.

[-] Pudutr0n@feddit.cl 10 points 1 month ago

Kids are total commies.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Make sure to get the same number of spots too.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 month ago

Even if you think height divided by two, why even describe it that way? Giraffes are tall, but not so unfathomably tall that something half its size is incomprehensible. That’s 7-9ish feet. You couldn’t say the size of Andre the Giant?

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago

The Youth Today don't know who that is. Then again, do they know how large a giraffe is? We may never know.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Then again, do they know how large a giraffe is?

Just today, I learned a handy way of visualizing the size of a giraffe. If you took that asteroid that struck off the coast of Iceland, and made a copy of it and put the two of them together, that's about the size of a giraffe.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

If that doesn't get you some Nobel prize, I don't know what will.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

Sorry, I need that in dishwashers or ping pong balls

[-] xylol@leminal.space 6 points 1 month ago

I think you just need to translate everything to bananas then go in from there

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

People usually measure asteroids by mass (but then, those people are already abnormal, so who knows?), if so, it's something around the size of a cow.

Or maybe they could use metric...

[-] cute_noker@feddit.dk 5 points 1 month ago

A big rock, maybe this is the appropriate time to use stone

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Okokimup@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kirca@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

This is why real scientists use the only reasonable real world measurement - a perfectly spherical cow in a vacuum.

[-] TorJansen@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Hmm. Thought they used bananas.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe in a shop vac.

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Dear gods

How far will these Americans go to not use the metric system... ffs

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

obviously the scientists meant a spherical giraffe in a vacuum

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] seraphine 20 points 1 month ago

americans be using anything but the metric system

[-] kalpol@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago
[-] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

But they're the sort of British that yearns for the good old days, when we still had shillings and inches and diphtheria and jumpers for goalposts and no womens' rights and all that great British stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

One standard volume giraffe of course, i.e. the volume in m³ an average giraffe would fill (at room temperature and sea level), when passed through a blender. And then half of that

[-] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Also, most people dont even have a good grasp on how big giraffes are anyways!

I once went to a zoo that had an elevated platform extending into the giraffe's habitat so that you could stand face to face with them. Their heads are as big as a normal human, like 5 feet from crown to chin!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] passenger@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

Reads Daily Mail clickbait, proceeds to blame "scientists"

[-] absentbird@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

So like the size of a horse?

The average horse is about half the height and weight of the average giraffe. Giraffes are just a really bad unit of measurement, males weight about 400kg more than females and there is a wide height difference over their global population, they are technically four different species we just all call giraffe 🦒

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I was just going to say, what kind of weird ass size comparison is that. It’s almost as egregious as saying “half the size of two apples”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And is it half the volume, mass or a dimension? Because I've never tried neither blending or carrying a giraffe before (I never got invited to those parties in uni) so I have no grasp on volume or mass.

[-] BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Surely a giraffe is nearly uniform density making the distinction between volume and mass irrelevant

Assume a spherical giraffe.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

I love it when I can understand your memes!

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Ask questions when you do not. :)

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Oh I wouldn’t begin to know what to even ask. I’m a music major lol. But if I think of something, I’ll pipe up.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Start with where you are, others will be there too. :)

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Thanks! I’ll do that.

[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

The Daily Mail readership will not fathom your question. It is a rag for those who would follow MAGA but want to appear intelligent without have either the natural talent or putting in any work to increase knowledge. Baseline racism is a requirement

[-] territorial@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago

In other words, a large boulder the size of a small boulder

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

I don't get why Americans are doing their best to avoid the metric system. It's always weird discriptions. Like dishwashers, or in this case, half a giraffe. Just use bananas if (cubic) meters are too complex.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oyfrog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The anatomical answer is sagitally down the midline.

[-] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

It's not the scientists, it's a single journalist who is popping out these headlines. Some of those caught attention.

[-] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 month ago

I once saw a snake half the size of a garden hose.

[-] EvilEdgelord@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

You divide the giraffe vertically down the center 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
984 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16934 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS