185
submitted 20 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The German chancellor has called for a welfare reform, putting him on course for a possible clash with the SPD.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

Then how about stopping welfare for millionaires?

Or stop subsiding e.g. plane fuel. Better for the environment anyway.

[-] UpperBroccoli 27 points 10 hours ago

All this while systematically crippling our tax investigation departments.

If I ever meet Merz or someone like him, I will have choice words to say.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Words alone have never stopped fascists.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 31 points 13 hours ago

there you go, they finally said it out loud. austerity it is.

[-] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 24 points 12 hours ago

Austerity doesn’t even work. It’s deliberate cruelty.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 hours ago

It works for the wealthy. It saves them a lot of money on taxes.

[-] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

It’s short sighted though.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

It’s not short sighted for the wealthy. Over the last 40 years, the wealthy have amassed massive amounts of income and wealth. It worked out great for them and the politicians that they purchase.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 12 hours ago
[-] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

Just before Covid it was in British news that austerity hadn’t worked (No shit…), so what did they do? More austerity. It’s fucking infuriating.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 68 points 16 hours ago

Merz is predictable and a traitor to the German people. He will usher in the fascist power grab through conservative policies - the AFD will grow in popularity as conservatives protect the 1%.

Die Linke's tax plan would have paid for the yearly debt of the government and then some; their secret - tax the wealthy.

We can afford all of our costs, we can improve society, we can provide a thriving economy for all Germans if we simply tax the ultra wealthy out of existence. No one should have a billion euro net worth, nor 100 million nor 50 million. No one need own 3 houses while others go without even a flat.

We have enough wealth in this country, it's just in the hands of the hoarders. Don't look towards conservatives or the right for change, look towards those that address the root problem!

[-] marsza@lemmy.cafe 35 points 15 hours ago

Tick tock on the fascism clock.

[-] SoleInvictus 13 points 14 hours ago

My partner and I almost moved to Germany last year and I am so glad we didn't. If we're going to be in a fascist country, I'd prefer to be a citizen since white fascists tend to frown extra hard on us brown immigrants.

[-] marsza@lemmy.cafe 2 points 14 hours ago

How’s your Spanish? I hear good things about Chile.

[-] SoleInvictus 2 points 10 hours ago

Good enough to be understood but not good enough to not use idioms incorrectly. For example, I spent a solid five minutes trying to remember if "así así" or "ni fu ni fa" can apply to competency before throwing my hands up.

Mediocre. Mi español es mediocre.

I just need practice.

[-] sadTruth@lemmy.hogru.ch 144 points 20 hours ago

Creating 1500B € out of thin air to build killing machines: Whatever it takes to protect the country!

Spending 50B € to actually protect the people from poverty/malnutrition/starvation: Nooooo we can't afford that.

Humanity at it's best: Limitless effort to create suffering, 0 effort to reduce suffering.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

I suspect there will be many, many 'I didn't think they'd do this to ME' posts coming from German people in the coming months.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 10 points 18 hours ago

Oh no! Did you "progressive" liberal parties take away all your entitlements to appease their corporate overlords? Don't worry, I'll make sure to blame all of the German people when AfD becomes the dominant party in Germany next election

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

It depends on the country, I suppose.

I don't know enough about German politics to be able to place blame on anyone. I just know from observing US and UK politics that there is always a percentage of people who vote fascist thinking that it won't adversely affect their own lives personally.

[-] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 14 points 18 hours ago

The problem is the fascists have figured out how to win: rig the game so all the viable choices are at least somewhat fascist. Picking the lesser of several evils will never protect you from fascism.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

You're right.

[-] Maroon@lemmy.world 167 points 20 hours ago

It can. Tax the billionaires.

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 75 points 19 hours ago
[-] petrjanda@gonzo.markets 1 points 18 hours ago

They will just move to the next country.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 54 points 18 hours ago

If they want to operate in the world's 3rd largest economy, they will not.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 24 points 18 hours ago

Then you set up an exit tax and a tax on citizens living abroad

[-] petrjanda@gonzo.markets 1 points 18 hours ago

Not a solution as this will hurt people who aren't billionaires as well.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 24 points 17 hours ago

With fair tax brackets it shouldn't matter much

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 11 points 17 hours ago

Always threatened, but never happens.

[-] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago

They own assets. Take away those assets, they lose their “leverage”.

[-] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

They probably will at first. But they will want to come back. And billionaires really don't like not getting what they want, even if it costs them more than they want to get it. You don't need to be the lowest bidder to get billionaires. They won't all go live in Bermuda or LA forever. What good is their money if it doesn't let them live wherever they want? You already have all the things you need to attract them. Culture, history, prestige, safety. You will have even more of al those things when you make them pay their share.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 48 points 17 hours ago
  • Print 1bn in welfare
  • Welfare ultimately gets spent into rich folks’ coffers
  • Tax that 1bn back out of the rich
  • Net cost: zero

What’s “unaffordable” here?

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago

It's unaffordable to greedy corporations and billionaires who would not afford the working to have a single dime in their pocket if they had it their way.

[-] NochMehrG@feddit.org 62 points 19 hours ago

And this is how you further damage democracy and strengthen the far right. Because a lot of the people who don’t vote or vote for the far right are people who feel left behind who are of the impression that the system is broken and they don’t benefit from it. Social welfare is a way to directly show everyone what a democratic state is good for. Policies that benefit the poor, the working class and the middle class make a strong society. But Merz and others simply don’t seem to get it or care and stare in wonder at the ever rising numbers of people who want to see the world burn.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

The capitalist elite has less problem with fascism than socialism. Only one of those threatens their wealth

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

In the short term. Both threaten their wealth in the long run. Fascism still wins out.

[-] petrjanda@gonzo.markets 7 points 18 hours ago

Fully agree. The big problem is Germany industry is in the shits and can't afford to finance the welfare state anymore. Military spending is all debt.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago

... without finally taking the upper ten percent into the taxpaying fold.

[-] langweiligeflunder@feddit.org 46 points 20 hours ago

Im ashamed for who has become our chancellor. Flying around in his private "middle-class" jet while taxing the poor. Jfc Friedrich, step back

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

I should hope heads of state are not flying around on commercial jets.

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 16 hours ago

No, he has owned a private jet for many years prior to becoming chancellor.

[-] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 20 hours ago

it could easily , just slim down the government , remove tax waste and more. a city near me just bought 32 benches at the cost of 70k€ EACH yes 70.000 why ? end of quarter they didnt want to get budget cuts the next quarter. some citizens found very similiar benches from another company ( like minimal different same material ) for 3,5k EACH 3500 each or many of the million graves of taxes , we have in my city multiple "Autobahn" which arent used but were built and need maintenance why ?

Our Government makes home owners pay for street repairs in full and more , where does our tax money go?

[-] null@piefed.au 14 points 19 hours ago

where does our tax money go?

This is a pretty easy question to answer given that you're talking about a public institution.

The only difficulty is that the answer is complex and requires reading and understanding many sets of financial reports and accompanying minutes et cetera.

a city near me just bought 32 benches at the cost of 70k€ EACH

That's a pretty absurd claim, and simply not how budgets in public institutions work.

Sure there might have been some kind of fuckup so installation of one of 32 benches cost $70k, or any number of other plausible explanations, but large public institutions don't just throw $2.25m EUR at the end of a quarter as a budget stuffing exercise.

[-] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

While I couldn't find the article anymore ( it's a bit old ) I just found one for 12 for 170 thousand.

Another where they pay 20k for each because they are circular and more.

Tax waste is just all surrounding.

[-] null@piefed.au 1 points 2 hours ago

So you're just making things up based on the vibe.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 17 hours ago

just slim down the government

It's an easy thing to say, but even with the waste and bloat the government function itself is just a few percent of the expense. Pensions, health, education and child support are the vast majority of expenses. Remove the money from government, tack in on to pensions and you kicked the can down the road for another few years. After that the pension and health costs increases and eats up the extra money due to ageing of the population. Now you're back at square 1 but with a lot less people in government to keep things together.

You can't use immigrants to work jobs and pay taxes. It was tried, got a bunch of backlash in the end and by now the right has their campaigns ready to go all out if somebody suggests this. Birth rate is going down so it'll be rising costs of ageing and no new incomes from new workers. They're f-ed and know it. We all knew this moment would come, but if somebody suggested saving now for later they got voted out of office so nothing got done.

[-] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 17 points 19 hours ago

Always has been. "We cannot afford x any more" has been their standard argument for dismantling social security and lining up their own pockets for decades now.

[-] Anahkiasen 6 points 20 hours ago

You mean it is now?

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
185 points (100.0% liked)

World News

49331 readers
1781 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS