127
submitted 3 days ago by ramble81@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 15 points 2 days ago

They’re spending all of the money that might go to our inheritance on themselves, but mostly because the medical system has figured out how to extract all of their money from them when they are near death through hospice care, assisted living facilities, and other means.

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I personally don't like the idea of inheritance in general but first thought that came to my head when I read this - every time I hear about the "great wealth transfer" that's supposed to happen, I think nah, it's all going to go to long term care and into the pockets of the people who own those places.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 187 points 3 days ago

Sell all their homes to corporation in a reverse mortgage, so they get the cash now and the homes stay off the market for young people.

[-] DoGeeseSeeGod 66 points 3 days ago
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 33 points 3 days ago

A lot of the cash will go on healthcare. But a bunch will go on trips in retirement and other stuff..of course no wealth transfer any more except for the uber wealthy.

It's a case of the young no longer having a large sun of money at once to buy a house while also taking housing off the market. This reduces supply and demand keeping prices somewhat affordable for corps but out of reach for people. Renting is the new serfdom.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 3 days ago

I mean, young people can't afford their houses, at some point something's gotta give, or yeah they'll sell them to corporations.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Tom Selleck, do your mustache magic

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

The Me generation has already pulled the ladder so high, that most of Gen X never made it onto even the bottom rung.

Their parents named them The Me Generation. They tried to stick that label on Gen X, not realizing that they didn't have enough of us for us to ever be relevant.

The Greediest Generation will be taught about, as the people who were so shortsighted they sold out themselves and their next 5 generations of offspring.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 98 points 3 days ago

Corporate nursing homes milking them of all their remaining inheritable money.

[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

Exactly this. I've seen it with two of my family members.

[-] if_only@sh.itjust.works 80 points 3 days ago

My boomer relatives floated the idea of donating their estates to the mormon church upon their deaths, fucking their apostate kids out of any inheritance

[-] Elaine@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

You oughta see their gilded temples. They’re really hurting for money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Climate change, although the younger generations aren't doing much to help with that either.

[-] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 days ago

climate change.

[-] Geodad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[-] AlecSadler 5 points 2 days ago

My cousin's neighbor got screwed by this. Thought he was inheriting the home et al - turns out the bank is coming in to take the home unless he can come up with a chunk of money he absolutely doesn't have. Now he has to unexpectedly move.

[-] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Corporate slavery. Indentured indefinitely.

[-] jimmux@programming.dev 66 points 3 days ago

It's been happening for a while. Aged care is very expensive, and is often secured with assets. These places will take all the hoarded wealth before it can transfer to anyone who needs it.

Some would say the answer is to not outsource care of our loved ones, but how do we do that without housing or job security, in an economy where nobody has the time for it?

[-] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I guess they'll die

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago

They've already done it. The environment is fucked for future generations.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago

they didn't stop

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

To spite the libs, they'll inflate the US dollar till its worthless.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 52 points 3 days ago

Dying and leaving us holding the bag.

Rather, dying and leaving it all to the few sycophantic offspring they've managed to brainwash to continue their legacy.

[-] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

this.. this is absolutely my exact life situation right now.

like we don't agree about ANYTHING even though i am literally watching them suffer from the consequences of how they've been voting since they came of age (fuck Reagan)

why do i keep hanging out with them? because they have a boat? i don't think it's worth it anymore

ugh

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 26 points 3 days ago

they already did, decades ago. consistently voting with the republicans. like 1-2 generations ago, when they went with reagen, and then again with BUSH as the final act.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Gravesites. There will be no room to bury Gen X and down.

[-] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

Jokes on them, we will never be able to stop working long enough to have a proper funeral. They'll just bury us where we drop.

Not like most of us care anyway. Just throw my rotten corpse in a dumpster, ain't nobody wanna smell it anyway.

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

Good thing more and more people are choosing cremation these days.

[-] notsure@fedia.io 24 points 3 days ago

...privatization of social security...

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is the correct answer. And, they’ll do it so that it kicks in only for people younger than them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago

Leave their houses to their pets when they die.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] infinitevalence@discuss.online 21 points 3 days ago

Firing the FED chairman and putting a political appointee in his place. It's kicking the ladder out from underneath you while you hang yourself with Epstein's rope.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 3 days ago

I think crashing the dollar is more likely to screw the boomers than the young. They have the wealth which will devalue. The super wealthy with generational wealth will be fine as inflation will help their assets. the boomers transitioning from assets to cash for stability in retirement will be screwed.

[-] thirtyfold8625@thebrainbin.org 7 points 3 days ago

I disagree. Inflation affects property (which probably refers to every tangible thing you will interact with other than the currency that is inflating). If the amount of money you need to give up in order to acquire an object increased due to time passing, that is "inflation". That means that when inflation happens, every person who has at least 1 dollar bill suffers (since they won't be able to trade it for as much stuff as they could before). A person who is significantly wealthier than someone else probably won't have a significantly larger amount of money. Elon Musk surely doesn't have 1 billion $1 bills stored in a basement: they probably have a large amount of money in their wallet and in a bank account, but I would be surprised if less than 90% of their net worth was derived from owning property. A "billionaire" might have 100 times as much "money" as the typical person, but they probably don't have 10,000 or 100,000 times as much: https://breznikar.com/articles/how-much-cash-on-hand-do-billionaires-have/1781 https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/smart-money/average-net-worth-by-age This means that when there is inflation, a poor person's net worth will likely decline more than that of a rich person, since it's likely that a large amount of a poor person's net worth will be in the form of cash when compared to a rich person (and the net worth of a rich person will probably increase, since it's likely that the value of their property will increase more than the amount they lose from the value of their money going down). People who are older are usually wealthier than young people, and people who are wealthier probably derive a larger percentage of their net worth from owning property than someone who is less wealthy, so when inflation happens, the net worth of young people probably decreases more when compared to older people.

Some things that can offset the impact of inflation are having debt and/or income that increases when inflation happens. I intentionally mentioned that property is tangible, but income and an obligation to pay someone using money seem less tangible. If you only own a $100 bill in your pocket, but you have a debt of $100 and your household income is $80,610 each year, if prices double but your income doubles too, that means that your net worth would not really change (you still have $100 and owe $100), but it would be easier to pay your debt (since it would become a smaller proportion of your income). If your income increases faster than inflation does (which is technically a typical situation), that means that you are in a better position as time passes! Moreover, old people typically have less (earned) income and debt than younger people, so in some ways young people have an advantage over old people.

In general, getting more (earned) income and debt is probably the way to overtake someone older than you. Getting a job providing something that old people pay for (like gambling or medical services) is probably an even better way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago

Blocking all progress on climate change in order to squeeze every last ounce of profit out of the fossil fuel industry...and then watching the world burn from their private orbital habitat.

[-] Two_Hangmen@midwest.social 20 points 3 days ago

In the U.S., project 2025.

[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 3 days ago

Nuclear war

why would there be a "final way"?

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

They're GONNA die. They don't get life extension tech. For one thing, they're already too old for it to do much for them.

so.. you envision one last boomer dying out and suddenly the sun rises? like who do you think is behind the mass fucking of the public? no one born after 1970?

[-] VerilyFemme 14 points 3 days ago

Mutually Assured Destruction

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Figure out a way to live an extra 10 years so any money they have left goes right into the healthcare system never to be seen again.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

People like you will do it for them. You think old people are fucking you over when it's the billionaires. Meh.

[-] AlecSadler 5 points 2 days ago

It's both, it doesn't have to be binary, are you a bot?

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Go full zombie (with the help of Fox 'News').

Then put all of their assets into Trump coins.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 13 points 3 days ago

They're more likely to kick the ladder out from under themselves, if gen Z doesn't been them to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33767 readers
1069 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS