334
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 168 points 7 months ago

I am shocked…shocked! that Google would let a product die on the vine and cease supporting it. Google assistant is dead, long live Gemini assistant!

[-] Pistcow@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

Its about generating investor buzzwords and killing off beloved apps every 3-6 months.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

As I understand it, Google mostly ships new stuff that they let die because it's one of the only ways to get a promotion at Google - to ship a product.

Once shipped, the newly promoted staff moves on to something else, and the business people take a look and see if the product actually makes any sense from a financial perspective, which is rarely the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

I Still get their apps confused because of the stupid icon updates....or maybe I stupid and can't learn new things.

[-] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Their new icons are so dumb. I think they thought people would get used to them but no, they’re still bad after several years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nirodhaavidya@lemmy.world 61 points 7 months ago

I assume this is going to arrive at the solution of "Upgrade to Gemini-supported devices today!" Yeah, no thanks. I wish I could get Home Assistant working with my nest minis.

[-] kayohtie@pawb.social 4 points 7 months ago

I ended up picking up two of the Home Assistant Voice PE devices and I've been fairly happy with them. I even extended their firmware so I have a clock display on each with one being my bedroom alarm clock even. But even out of the box functionality, as long as you can either run faster-whisper on Home Assistant (or another box), or don't mind their lighter device-control-only route, is totally solid.

Plus music streaming to them (with an external speaker attached via the 3.5mm jack) is pretty good!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

So Google half baked a product, pushed it to the public whether they wanted it or not, and now it's giving up on it replacing it with another half baked product nobody asked for...

Seems par for the course for Google

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

In all fairness, in the early days of Google Assistant it really was useful. It actually worked. Somehow in the last 5 years it plummeted. As in it stunningly and noticeably kept getting worse year after year.

[-] Entertainmeonly 12 points 7 months ago

I have been saying for years my phone was so much smarter in 2015. I don't know what happened. I could rename it talk to it and it was responsive and did what was asked. Crazy.

[-] st3ph3n@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago

Amazon Alexa has followed the same trajectory.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

As has Siri.

It used to have all kinds of plugins, like Wolfram|Alpha, that let you do fun and silly things with it.

It's simply gone downhill ever since.

The new Apple intelligence siri is arguably even worse. I tried asking it what the date would be next Tuesday, all I got back was "I don't understand".

Unintelligent Siri managed to crack that one without fault.

[-] GreenCrunch@lemmy.today 4 points 7 months ago

I have a Google smart speaker that I got as a freebie. I used to use it (>3 years ago) for timers, alarms, etc. and had few problems, I just stopped when I moved and didn't set it up. I put them back up a few months ago and it sure seems worse to me. Always triggering on random conversations, or to dialog on TV. Anyway they are permanent residents of the closet now. They suck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sturger@sh.itjust.works 39 points 7 months ago

My how things have changed over the years! Why, when I was a young girl, we didn't have the internet. When we wanted to turn a light on, we had to write a letter to Ford Motor Co. (They were the tech of the day.) I'd write, "Dear Mr. Ford, please give us permission to turn on our light in the dining room." Of course then we'd have to find a stamp, then walk the letter down to the nearest post office. (That was faster than waiting for the mailman to pick it up from the neighborhood mail box.) Sure enough, 6 weeks later we'd receive a reply saying, "Fine, turn on the light in the dining room." The postman delivered mail in the morning, so we had to wait until dark to all gather around in the dining room and turn on the light with great ceremony.

We never understood why we needed to get permission from a company far away to turn on a light switch, but we were patriotic Americans, so we knew better than to question the process.

[-] MOCVD@mander.xyz 10 points 7 months ago

Totally read that in Abe Simpsons voice

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 32 points 7 months ago

You got to love the author of that article. If you want the lights to turn off and on normally, maybe people should use light switches. Those aren't going to break due to software downgrades, those don't require Gemini or internet connections.

And I understand, there are rare situations when throwing the internet at your home appliances can make sense for solving niche problems. Those situations definitely exist, but for almost everyone almost all of the time, but it's pretty fucking easy to turn lights off and on.

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 52 points 7 months ago

Lights are one of the areas where I think automation is genuinely useful, but my rule with anything "Smart" is that it has to be able to run 100% locally.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

It also needs to fail gracefully. A smart switch needs to fail to a dumb switch, not "no switch".

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

and retire gracefully, where the device becomes open source and available to the community of owners who have invested in it.

[-] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

You're absolutely correct. I have few smart switches around the house and automations for yard lights and stuff like that are pretty nice to have but I still have the physical switch where the dumb switch was to interact with if the automations are down or I just want to override them. The ones I use even accept the same faceplate than traditional ones so there's no change on anything unless you want to automate things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 months ago

I have a fan plugged into a smart switch that I’ve set to turn off when I fade up my mic while doing my radio show. It’s the most glorious use of throwing the internet at a home appliance I’ve yet come up with.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 7 months ago

We have smart switches set to turn off floor sitting electricals if the leak sensor picks up a flood in the basement brewery. It also alerts us through HA there's a beernami

[-] frezik 7 points 7 months ago

My rule for home automation is that it has to work in a low-tech way. I get Zigbee switches for certain things, but they work as just a light switch if everything is down. This is not true of Phillips Hue bulbs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I have three lights that were wired to one switch. With smart bulbs, I can individually turn them on and off or dim them. No "dumb" solution exists for homes that were wired in a stupid way. This isn't a niche application, it's a common reality.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 7 months ago

We have leak sensors in the basement brewery and sockets that help the hubs ADHD and anxiety (did i forget to turn X off? I shall check my phone), all running through a HA server. A mate has literally programmed in migraine protocols.

Automation ain't bad. Capitalism is what the haters are angry at. Wish they'd go shit on that instead of stupid commentary about laziness.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You can get socket extensions where the bulb goes into it and then each extension is connected to a wall mount remote switch. No wifi needed and then you have a wall switch for each bulb.

Doesn't fit into every light fixture though depends on the design.

Edit:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

Automated lighting based on day of week and weather is fun tho, then again I run it through home assistant lol

[-] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 7 months ago

Long time google assistant user, but them putting Gemini in it is what I'm afraid of, not the solution.

This is yet another "google released a product, didn't know what to do with it, and made zero updates over the last decade, so now they're killing it." I don't think they've ever fixed the bugs that existed the first day I bought mine. The speaker is handy for casting to, but also cast is a shitty non-open protocol.

Kinda just agree with the "everything in this space sucks" unfortunately.

[-] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

I don't use Google assistant to control any other devices but the amount of stuff I ask 'hey Google's to do over the last few years has gotten worse than when it first started. More often now I just play music to it via Bluetooth connection.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago

It's also how randomly terrible it will be. There are days it couldn't set timers only to work the next day. Or worse telling it stop timer would stop what was playing on a completely different device.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 22 points 7 months ago

Is it easy to set up a smart speaker with Home Assistant? Last I heard, it was kind of a PITA.

[-] Overspark@feddit.nl 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Depends on which one you have. If you buy their own smart speaker (Voice PE), which is designed to stay entirely local if you have the right hardware and software locally, and even has a hardware switch to temporarily disable the microphone, it's pretty easy. And of you don't have all that locally you need a paid subscription to use their cloud a little bit, but they won't store anything. So still pretty easy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Buy this. You can use your own voice processing on another machine on your network. You could even hook it up to your Ollama. I have it and it's completely replaced Google Home for voice control.

[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

How is the speaker in that? I have some atoms and the speaker sucks. Thinking about buying a bunch of these Google devices and replacing the PCB but I'd rather save the time if something like this actually has good sound.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

For music, it's not great. For voice, it's pretty good. It's decently loud and legible. There's no bass. The mics however are pretty good. As far as I've read, you can't get the mics to work well unless they're tuned for that speaker in physical placement and hardware/firmware. The HA speaker uses the same kind of DSP chip that makes it possible for it to hear well in worse than ideal conditions which makes speech recognition work so well. So yeah, if you don't wanna faff with stuff and you don't care about music, just get it. It's got 3.5mm TRS out if you wanna hook a proper speaker for music. The DAC is probably not amazing for HiFi but should you want to hook up something like a JBL Charge, I imagine it should work. In fact I'm planning to do this in another room where I used to use a larger Google Nest speaker for music.

[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

Does it work with music assistant in HA? Thanks for the response btw

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I'm curious about this as well. I think all the components are available, but nobody's clicked them together yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheOrionArm@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

George Orwell was wrong. We didn't need the government to bug our houses, we did it ourselves. 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sturger@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

5 years ago voice assistants were being promoted with all the breathless excitement that "AI" is receiving today. I imagine in 5 year's more time Google will be giving the same listless attention to their AI products that they are giving to their voice assistants now. Well, actually to just about every product they've ever made, except maybe for Google Mail.

[-] prole 8 points 7 months ago

It can't even properly schedule reminders anymore, the one fucking thing I used to for.

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Give me a good non-cloud voice control system that works and I'll switch in a second. And on another note: The "Hey Google" command is so fucking annoying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago
[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

so glad i use google home as a sirius speaker and speaking to it is the only way i can control it /s

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
334 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

82070 readers
2732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS